Jump to content

User:Keeper76/dashboard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
userpage | talk | dashboard | rfa | contribs | subpages | freqtemps | afd/o | archive


CAVEAT: all the |show= parameters have been set to 7 days.


Update this page
Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
Requests for unblock 91
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 91
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 7
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 0
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 21
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 2
Candidates for speedy deletion 9
Open sockpuppet investigations 84
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

AB = Administrative Backlogs

Administrative backlog

Requests for unblock
SPI cases awaiting administration
Template:Admin dashboard
Template:Admin dashboard/light
Template:Admin dashboard/light/sandbox
Template:Admin dashboard/uaarfpp
Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism
Wikipedia:Categories for discussion
Wikipedia:Closure requests
Wikipedia:Copyright problems
Template:Did you know/Queue
Template:DYK queue/backlog
Wikipedia:Files for discussion
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies
Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion
Wikipedia:Requested moves
Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/AutoWikiBrowser
Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Extended confirmed
Wikipedia:Templates for discussion
Wikipedia:WikiProject History Merge
Wikipedia:WikiProject on open proxies/Requests

WP:AIV

AIV= Administrator intervention against vandalism

Administrator intervention against vandalism

Reports

Bot-reported

User-reported


CSD / PRODs

CSD= Candidates for speedy deletion ; PROD= Proposed deletions

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
User requested 3
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 3
Importance or significance not asserted 0
Other candidates 4

The following articles have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
( source / chronological order / expired )

Deletion backlog

{{CSD backlogs}} 7 backlognav 2 5 single cat

BLP articles proposed for deletion by days left – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Proposed deletion – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 2 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 1 item

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old – 1 item

Requested RD1 redactions – 2 items

Expired proposed deletions of unsourced BLPs – No backlog currently

WP:UAA / WP:RFPP

UAA= Usernames for administrator attention ; RFPP= Requests for page protection

Usernames for administrator attention

Bot-reported

User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request protection of a page, or increasing the protection level
Shortcuts

Place requests for new or upgrading pending changes, semi-protection, full protection, move protection, create protection, template editor protection, or upload protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.


Dancing on Ice series 14

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by IP editors. Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:59, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 22:28, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Joe Biden 2020 presidential campaign

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from multiple IPs and one registered account since December 1. Aoi (青い) (talk) 17:30, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Dress to Impress (video game)

Reason: Persistent vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 19:20, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Brian Thompson (businessman)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Recent death/murder/assassination/killing. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 19:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

@LilianaUwU: Can you present links to some of diffs that are BLP policy violations? I'm not seeing anything immediate while skimming through them, though I could very much be missing something. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 19:42, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
I would send one where a reference presumably is his address, but let's not give more work to OSers. LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 20:04, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
This is one. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:06, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
The page history also has oversighted edits today. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:09, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Declined If another administrator sees this differently, I've no objection to a different decision. However, I've looked at every diff done to the article (minus the oversighted ones), and while there is some vandalism, it's not a lot. I count five vandalism edits to the article. I do see considerable contributions from IPs and new accounts that are productive. I'm reluctant to add protection to an article where there is quite a bit of productive activity on an article from such users, and where the vandalism rate is not particularly high. --Hammersoft (talk) 00:15, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Scrambled eggs

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 19:30, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Hezly Rivera

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism Riley1012 (talk) 19:50, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Article

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent creation of drafts at wrong title. Jalen Barks (Woof) 20:50, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

A.J. & Big Justice

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 20:59, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Chief of the General Staff (Israel)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. Filmssssssssssss (talk) 21:04, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Las Mujeres Ya No Lloran World Tour

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Persistent disruptive editing against MOS by a self-admitted sock puppet. livelikemusic (TALK!) 21:40, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Evie Magazine

Reason: Hello! There are biased actors who repeatedly keep changing this page using only a couple of hit-pieces as sources. This is completely unfair. It is not a political magazine (there isn't even a politics section). It's a lifestyle and cultural publication. If Vogue, Elle, Marie Claire, Refinery29, Cosmopolitan are not described as "Politically liberal", than Evie should not be described as "politically conservative." This violates Wikipedia's own rules of bias. I've repeatedly included information that is factual and directly taken from the site's own page, and it keeps getting removed.

Evie covers health, beauty, fashion, relationships, sex, living, culture, and news. This keeps getting removed. The correct name of the business "Evie Magazine, Inc" keeps getting removed and replaced with the wrong entity name. The co-founder keeps getting removed as a co-founder. Please help, and thank you! 2601:3CB:100:7250:E8F0:4536:CD57:4D47 (talk) 02:16, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Declined – Content dispute. Please use the article's talk page or other forms of dispute resolution. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:27, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Also, just as a note, we can't copy-paste from external websites and incorporate that content into the article, as you did here when you copied the about us into the article. Use in this manner could constitute a copyright violation, particularly because we re-license our text commercially and without restrictions, which probably goes beyond down-the-road fair use claims. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:30, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Blackjack

Reason: Persistent vandalism RainbowStar27 (talk) 02:28, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Talk:Chase Strangio

Temporary semi-protection: Misgendering and transphobia on the talk page of a trans man currently in the news. Funcrunch (talk) 02:49, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

I also request that the vandals' edits be redacted. Funcrunch (talk) 02:50, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
User(s) blocked: 73.120.33.131 (talk · contribs) blocked by Red-tailed hawk. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:41, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

E1 Entertainment

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Repeated hijacking of redirect; at least one revert claims sockpuppetry, but I cannot locate the master. Jalen Barks (Woof) 04:19, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: One or more pages in this request appear to already be protected. Please confirm.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 04:46, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. (The server did it three times after first being down..) Bishonen | tålk 05:02, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level
Shortcuts

Before posting, first discuss with the protecting admin at their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.

  • To find out the username of the admin who protected the page click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page" which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
  • Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
  • Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
  • If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected please use the section below.

Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

Shortcuts

COVID-19

Reason: COVID 19 isn’t a huge topic anymore, I think the protection can be reduced to semi. Heyaaaaalol (talk) 23:13, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

@HJ Mitchell: you did the most recent protection. I think the reason for the current EC protection is likely no longer a concern. There are a couple of old but reasonable edit requests on the talk page too. Is it OK with you to reduce to semi? ~Anachronist (talk) 01:27, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
HJ did a visibility change to a vandal's edit. @El C did the most recent protection level change. Zinnober9 (talk) 02:19, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

Matt Lambros

Reason: It's been 13 years. The vandal who kept saying the article subject was dead is surely long gone by now. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 03:26, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit to a protected page
Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here
Shortcut

Ideally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.

  • Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among {{Edit protected}}, {{Edit template-protected}}, {{Edit extended-protected}}, or {{Edit semi-protected}} to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed.
  • Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Wikipedia:Suggestions for COI compliance), the {{Edit COI}} template should be used.
  • Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here.
  • If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
  • This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
Further information: Wikipedia:Edit requests


Gaza genocide

My suggestion is to leave out the following 2 sentences in the "German complicity" paragraph as they seem to be based on misunderstandings:

"She also highlighted police suppression of pro-Palestine protests throughout Germany[509] as evidence of state complicity.[508] Karen Wells et al. highlight how Germany has entrenched its complicity in Israel's actions by banning use of the word "genocide" in reference to Israel.[471][better source needed]"

1. In general violent protests are not allowed in Germany. As some of the first pro-Palestine protests were violent, they were sometimes forbidden by courts, if they were expected to turn violent. But that is common policy in Gemany with all subjects and not special for pro-Palestine protests.

Meanwhile, there even is a calendar concerning pro-Palestinian protests[1] with daily up to 20 protests all over Germany. Thus, there is no general police suppression of pro-Palestine protests as is suggested by the current wording.

2. The word “genocide” is not banned in reference to Israel in Germany - maybe that was a misunderstanding: What is not allowed in Germany is to call for genocide against Jews. The slogan “From the river to the sea” is seen as such call and banned. Gilbert04 (talk) 15:34, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

@FortunateSons: A quick browse shows at least for the first part support for removal, can you add any additional incite? -- Cdjp1 (talk) 12:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I can confirm that both statements are broadly true. IMO, the best resource for this discussion (in the contemporary context) is probably Steinberg: Versammlungsfreiheit nach dem 7. Oktober - NVwZ 2024, 302. Direct citation: “Die Subsumtion unter diesen Tatbestand bereitet aber auch sonst Probleme. Die Stadt Frankfurt a. M. hatte dem Anmelder einer Versammlung „Frieden in Nahost" am 2.12.2023 untersagt, während der Versammlung zur Vernichtung Israels aufzurufen, dem Staat Israel das Existenzrecht abzusprechen, sowie die Aussagen „Israel Kindermörder", „Juden Kindermörder", „Israel bringt Kinder um" sowie „From the river to the sea" zu tätigen. Diese Beschränkungen hob das VG Frankfurt vollständig auf. Auf die Beschwerde der Stadt differenzierte der VGH Kassel Aufrufe zur Vernichtung Israels verstießen - wie gesagt - gegen § 111 StGB und die Aussage „Juden Kindermörder" erfülle den Tatbestand der Volksverhetzung (§ 130 StGB). Demgegenüber wurden andere Außerungen wie „Kindermörder Israel" oder die Bezeichnung der israelischen Militäroperationen in Gaza als „Genozid" nicht beanstandet und die Entscheidung des VG insoweit aufrechterhalten. Es sei davon auszugehen, dass bei den militärischen Verteidigungshandlungen Israels auch Kinder zu Schaden kämen. Eine solche laienhafte Zuspitzung sei im Rahmen der Meinungsfreiheit hinzunehmen. Anders hatte der VGH Mannheim am 21.10.2023 ein Verbot der Parole „Israel Kindermörder" und „Israel bringt Kinder um" durch die Versammlungsbehörde trotz bestehender Zweifel über deren Strafbarkeit aufrechterhalten; im Verfahren des vorläufigen Rechtsschutzes sei nur eine summarische Prüfung möglich; eine einmal getätigte Äußerung könne nicht rückgängig gemacht werden. Die Unterscheidung zwischen antisemitisch und antiisraelisch stellt sicherlich eine Gratwanderung dar, die hier im Einzelnen nicht beschrieben werden kann“autotranslated: “However, the subsumption under this offense also causes other problems. On December 2, 2023, the city of Frankfurt am Main had prohibited the person registering a meeting "Peace in the Middle East" from calling for the destruction of Israel during the meeting, from denying the State of Israel the right to exist, and from making the statements "Israel, child murderer," "Jews, child murderer," "Israel kills children" and "From the river to the sea." The Administrative Court of Frankfurt completely lifted these restrictions. In response to the city's complaint, the Administrative Court of Kassel differentiated that calls for the destruction of Israel violated - as mentioned - Section 111 of the Criminal Code and that the statement "Jews, child murderer" constituted incitement to hatred (Section 130 of the Criminal Code). In contrast, other statements such as "Israel, child murderer" or the description of Israeli military operations in Gaza as "genocide" were not objected to and the Administrative Court's decision was upheld in this respect. It can be assumed that children would also be harmed in Israel's military defense actions. Such a lay exaggeration must be accepted within the framework of freedom of expression. On October 21, 2023, the Mannheim Higher Administrative Court upheld a ban on the slogans "Israel, child murderer" and "Israel kills children" by the assembly authority despite existing doubts about their criminal liability; in the interim legal protection procedure, only a summary examination is possible; a statement once made cannot be reversed. The distinction between anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli is certainly a balancing act that cannot be described in detail here.” There is no broad ban on pro-Palestinian protests either, and they were even allowed to happen on Oct. 7 of this year (in some cases). While there are legal disputes on specifics for both, I’m pretty confident that no reasonable person would disagree with “broadly permitted” regarding both claims. FortunateSons (talk) 16:54, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Bonus: there can be cases where something isn’t criminal, but can be restricted in other ways, for example due to different burdens of proof or social pressures. FortunateSons (talk) 17:11, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
I've removed #2. But there does seem to be evidence that pro-Palestine protests have been banned in parts of Germany at times.[2][3][4].VR (Please ping on reply) 14:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Thank you. Maybe the following article gives a bit more clarity.[[5]] Gilbert04 (talk) 18:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Unfortunately that source seems incomplete. Germany has indeed suppressed peaceful criticism of Israel.[6] And Washington Post says "A planned photo exhibit in southwestern Germany was canceled as a result of social media posts by its curator, including one describing “genocide” in Gaza."[7] VR (Please ping on reply) 22:32, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
Well, I do not think that any source will ever be complete. Let me add two more.[[8]][[9]] Gilbert04 (talk) 20:44, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
Makes sense. Can an admin please check this out!!! Avishai11 (talk) 19:05, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

This appears to have been dealt with? Selfstudier (talk) 16:13, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Gaza genocide 2

Consider changing "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations, and accused the court of being antisemitic, which it often does when criticised" to "The Israeli government has been accused of consistently weaponizing antisemitism against it's critics, including in the ICJ ruling." Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:12, 13 October 2024 (UTC)

The Weaponization of antisemitism page hyperlinked over "often done" has many sources to draw from regarding the accusations' consistency and nature.
My main concern with the original text is that it's voiced as if it's an observation made by a Wikipedian. The benefit here is that the weaponization of antisemitism has a clearer consistency grounded outside of Wikipedia. Perhaps other ways to word this out include adding a time scale (increasingly accused since Oct. 7th) or specifying the critique (against critiques of their actions since Oct 7th).
If a lead paragraph change is necessary, there may be reason to outline Israeli motives and conditions for the genocide, including Zionism and anti-Arab racism. Ecco2kstan (talk) 23:25, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
@Ecco2kstan, how about: "The Israeli government rejected South Africa's allegations. Supporters of Israel say that accusing Israel of genocide is both antisemitic[10][11] and a form of Holocaust erasure[12], but others argue antisemitism shouldn't be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations.[13][14][15][16]".VR (Please ping on reply) 00:12, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
I'm not as familiar with the Holocaust erasure claims, but I'm happy with that reworking! If that weaponization of Holocaust denial detail isn't on the weaponization of antisemitism page already, it might be a worthwhile phenomenon incorporate if there's more citations you can find. I might look into it myself. Thanks! Ecco2kstan (talk) 03:10, 16 October 2024 (UTC)
That does sound quite balanced. 1 from me. Neutral Editor 645 (talk) 18:02, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
@Vice regent: Would you please make this change, so we can close this request? ~Anachronist (talk) 21:28, 24 October 2024 (UTC)
The text I originally wanted modified was changed to "Israel's supporters say that accusing Israel of genocide is antisemitic, but others argue antisemitism should not be exploited to shield Israel from such allegations" after other discussions on the talk page. I almost like it better, but by saying "Israel's supporters" it relieves some of the responsibility from the Israeli government in the accusations that was, to an extent, duly credited in the original modification. Maybe now, it should just say "The Israeli government and their supporters say that accusing the state for genocide antisemitic..." or something similar. Ecco2kstan (talk) 17:39, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

This one, too? Selfstudier (talk) 16:15, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Two-state solution

I would like to request the addition of the following paragraph on Singapore’s support for a two-state solution under the section "International Positions on the Two-State Solution" in the Two-state solution article:

International Positions on the Two-State Solution

Singapore: Singapore supports a two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, advocating for a negotiated outcome aligned with relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions. According to Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Singapore believes this approach allows Israelis and Palestinians to coexist peacefully and securely, considering it the only viable path toward a comprehensive, just, and lasting resolution. Singapore also consistently upholds the Palestinian right to a homeland. The PLO, which constitutes the key pillar of the current Palestinian Authority, accepts Israel's right to exist and has renounced terrorism.[1]

EsenL (talk) 02:07, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

I support this. It makes sense, has quotations and everything. If only an admin would answer... @Avishai11 Avishai11 (talk) 19:02, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ "Reply to Parliamentary Question on Palestine". Retrieved 2024-11-12.
Source? Providing a source to back up your edit drastically improves the chance it'll be done. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 02:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
have added! thanks! EsenL (talk) 02:33, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Gaza genocide - the 186,000 indirect deaths estimate

In the "Indirect" section, the following sentence should be added after "186,000 or even more deaths could be attributable to the current conflict in Gaza":

Three days after the publication, one of the writers, Professor Martin McKee, clarified that the 186,000 figure was “purely illustrative”[1] and stated that “our piece has been greatly misquoted and misinterpreted.”[2]

References

  1. ^ "Concerns regarding Gaza mortality estimates". The Lancet. November 4, 2024.
  2. ^ "'186,000 Gazans dead': Lancet magazine publishes new blood libel". The Jerusalem Post. July 9, 2024.

Zlmark (talk) 16:26, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Springfield pet-eating hoax

I would like to request that a change be made for accuracy under the subhead Origin and spread: Other events. There is a reference to a photo of a man carrying two dead geese, but it is actually only one goose. Footnotes 54, 58, and 59 all state that there is one goose in the photo. Footnote 60 says two geese, but this is evidently a mistake on TMZ's part as the photo itself clearly shows only one goose.

I suggest that the wording "man carrying two dead Canada geese" be changed to "man carrying a dead Canada goose".

In the next sentence I suggest that the wording "The geese were roadkill" either be changed to "The goose was roadkill" or that this part of the sentence be eliminated since the only source for the goose being roadkill is the TMZ article which may be unreliable and perhaps should be removed as a reference? It's possible the official quoted by TMZ was referring to a different incident altogether involving two roadkill geese and TMZ mistakenly linked this to the Columbus photo.

Then I suggest in the following sentence the wording "stealing geese" be changed to "stealing a goose".

Also, I would like to suggest that the semi-protected status be lifted from the Talk page of this article. 2600:100A:B10A:4AA1:0:21:7E13:E301 (talk) 23:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

The talk-page protection cannot be reversed here; either contact El C or appeal at WP:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement to get it lifted. (I will note, however, that the semi-protection is set to lift 16 December.) —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 07:44, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

2024 US presidential election

In the state results table, I would like to request that the columns labeled Margin and Margin swing be filled in, for those rows/states in which the relevant data has already been entered. Obviously not every state has data, but most do.

This should be trivial, at least for Margin, but the inability to sort by margin has been annoying me for a week now. LoganStokols (talk) 19:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)

Israel–Hamas war

Hello,

In this article, the following section is problematic.

"On 9 or 10 October, Hamas offered to release all civilian hostages held in Gaza if Israel would call off its planned invasion of the Gaza Strip, but the Israeli government rejected the offer.[242]"

It needs to be taken out completely.

The original article is based on an interview in Times of Israel newspaper. In the interview, the interviewee mentions this as a side comment:

“We later found out that Hamas had offered on October 9 or 10 to release all the civilian hostages in exchange for the IDF not entering the Strip, but the government rejected the offer.”

There is no mention of how they found out, and this is pretty much the only "evidence" given in support of any offer from Hamas to release all civilian hostages. It is less than hearsay.

Thank you for listening.

Ioana IoanaBlandiana (talk) 16:49, 17 November 2024 (UTC)

January 6 United States Capitol attack

Add US Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms to Parties list Add US Marshal Service to Parties list Add Arlington County Police to Parties list Add US Park Police to Parties List 

Nhryan122 (talk) 05:32, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

2024 United States presidential election

Change 'Trump achieved a decisive victory in the electoral college' to 'Trump won the electoral college.'

I know reliable sources are using the word "decisive," but it feels a little too editorializing for the tone of Wikipedia. 2600:1700:46B0:D50:3074:103:DAF0:F89F (talk) 16:31, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

2024 United States presidential election

I want it to be added somewhere that Kamala Harris, despite her loss, received about 74.5 million votes, surpassing Trump's vote count in 2020. She also received almost 10 million more votes than Hillary Clinton did in 2016, and received the 3rd highest vote count of any nominee in history, and the most for any woman in American political history. Nate12346 (talk) 21:18, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Could you provide source(s) please? Lectonar (talk) 08:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Gaza genocide

The article references a Brookings poll[1] in its body under: Academic and legal discourse->Middle Eastern studies. The lead appears to misrepresent the information presented in the body.

In the lead, please change:

−
A majority of mostly US-based Middle East scholars believe Israel's actions in Gaza were intended to make it uninhabitable for Palestinians, and 75% of them say Israel's actions in Gaza constitute either genocide or "major war crimes akin to genocide".
According to a recent Middle East Scholar Barometer poll of 758 mostly US-based Middle East scholars, a majority of those respondents believe Israel's actions in Gaza were intended to make it uninhabitable for Palestinians, and 75% of them say Israel's actions in Gaza constitute either genocide or "major war crimes akin to genocide".

The wording found in the article body: "A Brookings 23 May to 6 June 2024 survey asked 758 Middle East scholars and experts who study the issue, most in the United States: "How would you define Israel's current military actions in Gaza?" The responses were: "major war crimes akin to genocide", 41%; "genocide", 34%; "major war crimes but not akin to genocide", 16%; "unjustified actions but not major war crimes", 4%; "justified actions under the right to self-defense", 4%; and "I don't know", 2%."

One single poll is almost certainly undue for the lead of any article, but if it will stand, it should accurately reflect the source. Mikewem (talk) 21:27, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

References

  1. ^ https://www.brookings.edu/articles/gloom-about-the-day-after-the-gaza-war-pervasive-among-mideast-scholars/

User:Gabriella~four.3-6

Reason: This username page has been indefinitely full protected but something is missing please add the missing padlock tag protection it needs to done let me know thanks. 148.76.225.97 (talk) 01:06, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Honduras200010

Reason: This username page has been globally locked so please add the tag yes on locked on this page let me know thanks. 148.76.225.97 (talk) 01:13, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.
Protected edit requests

0 protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Updated as needed. Last updated: 16:31, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
7 template-protected edit requests
v·h
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Infobox language (request) 2024-11-23 00:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
Template:League icon (request) 2024-11-29 12:35 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-20: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Video game reviews (request) 2024-11-30 21:50 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Infobox officeholder (request) 2024-12-02 04:50 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Designation (request) 2024-12-03 05:23 Template-protected (log) Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-19: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Chem2 (request) 2024-12-03 23:08 Template-protected (log) Modified by Oshwah on 2021-08-18: "High risk template."
Template:Rail-interchange (request) 2024-12-04 23:45 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000 transclusions"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 04:57, 5 December 2024 (UTC)


WP:RFA

RFA= Requests for adminship

WP:RFP

RFP= Requests for permissions

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Jason Lagos

I would kindly like to submit a request for autopatrolled rights. I have created 50 articles since 2017, which you will find listed on my user page here, none of which have been deleted nor have received any new page reviewers' comments in quite some time. I have also improved thousands more articles across Wikipedia. I am mainly interested in increasing the coverage of all things Brussels-related. Thanks in advance! Jason Lagos (talk) 17:42, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:52, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Reconrabbit

I would like to request autopatrolled rights, as I have been creating and plan to create many articles on the lists of chemical compounds that are well cited and have historically had few issues. I have also created other articles on biography, video games, and other subjects, which I may unreview myself if there are any doubts towards their suitability to the encyclopedia; I am mainly asking for this right for the chemical articles. Reconrabbit 18:15, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done —Femke 🐦 (talk) 21:10, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Moondragon21

He created 5,728 articles so far, out of which only 25 have been deleted. Most of these articles are based on elections and politics. I believe granting autopatrolled rights would be a suitable recognition for this work. Baqi:) (talk) 15:27, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Moondragon21's autopatrolled permission was revoked at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1109#Autopatrolled. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 04:44, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
 Not done Most creations are auto-notable politicians and elections which should be easy to review at NPP. Given the past revocation, I don't see enough substantial page creation to offset the concerns or to warrant requiring an auto-patrol flag. Sohom (talk) 07:17, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

User:CROIX

I have created over 200 articles, including twenty-nine since I was temporarily granted autopatrolled 90 days ago. Since November 2020, I have been primarily editing on Antigua and Barbuda-related topics. CROIXtalk 00:05, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done, I don't quite understand why it was temporary last time. – Joe (talk) 13:27, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

User:UzbukUdash

I have been editing Wikipedia for nearly 10 years with over 1000 edits, with 32 live articles primarily focusing on topic elated to asian audio visual and the institute in Bangladesh.

Thank you for considering my request. UzbukUdash (talk) 07:53, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment): This editor recently violated copyright guidelines in an article that was speedy deleted, and many of their articles have been deleted or moved to draft space. I don’t think AP would be a good fit for this user. GrabUp - Talk 15:22, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
 Not done. AP requires a track record of problem-less articles. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 19:35, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Darth Stabro

User:Pbritti told me to. Apparently I qualify, and I've been cranking out a decent number of articled recently. Been editing Wikipedia on and off since 2009, been editing more regularly for the last year or two. Been a rollbacker and pending changes reviewer for almost 12 years. I created one GA and have taken two articles from being just a few sentences to GA status, a few more nominations in the pipeline. ~Darth StabroTalk • Contribs 02:51, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Stating my support here. Encouraged him to seek this. He's told me about his plans for future articles and they seem to involve careful research up to GNG standards. His recent work has passed through GA and DYK, so quality is there. ~ Pbritti (talk) 02:56, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for confirmation


Confirmed

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:Prarthanarawal

Reason for requesting confirmed rights Adding to the pregnancy portion to the cancer page. I have worked on this piece for a whlie and have valid citations and sources. This is for a school project and not an act of vandalism or false information. Prarthanarawal (talk) 19:49, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done – Hi, and thank you for creating an account to edit Wikipedia. Although I fully understand your desire to dive right in, many of our articles are semi-protected because they are controversial, prone to vandalism, or other reasons. As a new editor with few edits, it might be wise to discuss your edits on the article talkpage in order to gain consensus for your edits, and then use {{Edit semi-protected}} to request the edit be performed. I only recommend this until you are used to the challenges of reliable sources, the biographies of living persons policy, and other similar policies. The good news is that fewer than 5 percent of Wikipedia articles are protected; this means that more than 95 percent of the articles can use your help right now! Just Step Sideways from this world ..... today 19:54, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

Requests for page mover

Page mover

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.


User:Raladic

I got Page Mover permissions in late August to help with the post-move cleanup of LGBT->LGBTQ and have since moved several (probably hundreds) uncontroversial subpages to follow it. I got an extension for another two months granted a month and a half ago to finish the cleanup and voiced my interest in helping with other unrelated moves as well. I started clerking at RM and RMTR for the past two months without issues or challenges to move requests I have acted on, showing that I appear to have a good grasp of our AT policies (and taking this note from SiverLocust as a compliment) and would like to request to keep the Page Mover permissions indefinitely to continue to help with RM and RMTR (and the occasional LGBTQ cleanup as I still stumble across some every now and then). Raladic (talk) 02:52, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

 Done. SilverLocust 💬 16:21, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Ldm1954

I have been doing NPP for a while in the physical sciences, with a bit of editing, creating a few articles and AfC. Several times during NPP I have come across "messes" where relics such as drafts have been left behind by inexperienced users. I would like to have the ability to move without a redirect. I don't expect to be using it that often, probably once a month at most. Ldm1954 (talk) 13:27, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

@Ldm1954: Based on your CSD log, my understanding is that you are requesting this so that you can move an existing draft "Draft:___" out of the way in order to draftify an article of that name "___". Assuming draftification would be appropriate (so, for example, it isn't a redraftification after a user has republished it to mainspace), you can just draftify the page to "Draft:___ (2)" (like this example) and possibly redirect the original draft to the new draft. If you need to history merge the drafts (or to delete one), then an administrator will be necessary whether or not you have pagemover permissions. Because of that, I don't see how pagemover permission would help. SilverLocust 💬 03:09, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Ok, then let's not bother with it. Ldm1954 (talk) 06:27, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Marking as  Request withdrawn for the archiving bot. SilverLocust 💬 06:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Spy-cicle

Experienced editor (10k edits; acccout over 5 years old), requesting this permission for occassional page moves I come across that need to be done also from moving drafts out into mainspace.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 01:14, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

Requests for mass message sender

Mass message sender

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.
Requests for pending changes reviewer


Pending changes reviewer

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:JayCubby

I've read and understood WP:RPC and will proceed slowly at first (that is, leave what I deem edge cases to someone else). JayCubby Talk 17:23, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. Calling this as a WP:NOTYET. Let's wait a little longer after the unblock to consider this. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

User:ReferenceMan

I am seeing pending review on several pages I regularly edit. For example, Larry Ellison ReferenceMan (talk) 11:09, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 05:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

User:WikiEditor5678910

I want to help new non-autoconfirmed and unregistered editors find their way on Wikipedia. I figured this role is the best and easiest way to do that. Also, just to let you know: I applied for this position back when I had 30 edits but I have around 70 edits now. WikiEditor5678910 (talk) 16:35, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

 Not done You were asked to make a few hundred constructive edits to mainspace, and wait a few months before requesting again. You haven't done that. * Pppery * it has begun... 05:08, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

User:ZyphorianNexus

I regularly check a variety of pages for editing issues and help fight vandalism. I also watch several pages, some of which have pending changes protection. I believe this would further help me fight vandalism. I’ve read and understand the guidelines for reviewing pending changes and am familiar with Wikipedia’s policies. Thanks for considering my request. ZyphorianNexus (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * it has begun... 05:09, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Malhar1234

I'm a humanities student from India, so I can review South Asian history, culture, societal norm very carefully and with authentic information. Malhar1234 (talk) 08:20, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

 Not done. Thank you for volunteering, but we'd prefer that you get a bit more experience on site before requesting additional permissions. In particular, we prefer some anti-vandalism work when considering granting this perm. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:58, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Requests for rollback


Rollback

Sorry, unregistered users cannot be granted permissions due to technical restrictions. Please create an account in order to request user account permissions.

User:TheMysteriousShadeheart

Requesting rollback permission to combat the pervasive presence of vandalism and/or edits of unencyclopedic quality to the best of my ability. At the present moment I am a semi-retired user; however, I have been a regular patroller of recent changes to both specific pages as well as the site as a whole. I'd very much like to learn the counter-vandalism tool RedWarn and/or Ultraviolet and get involved to a greater extent across the site in keeping pages up to editors' standards - I intend to be a long-term contributor to the site and expect to be much more active in the future, predominantly in this line of work. I've familiarized myself with WP:VANDTYPES and have encountered and attempted thus far to manually revert instances of controversial edits at times - edits which it would be far more helpful to all parties to take care of via rollback. I'd particularly like to delve into new ways to spot the more subtle instances that go unnoticed for longer periods of time, per WP:SNEAKY, as well as monitor for violations of WP:TPV and continually make an effort to practice WP:WARNVAND, WP:HTSV, WP:NOTVANDALISM, WP:RVAN and WP:NORESVAND among others. My most notable effort to prevent escalated conflict(s) would be in the Talk:Wings_of_Fire_(novel_series)#February_2023_Content_Editing_Conflict, though I do not yet have a track record of notifying users when reverting their edits beyond discussions on article talk pages (though this is typically as the reverted editor has tended to initiate the conversations first). Furthermore, I intend to prioritize diligently monitoring sockfarm-targeted pages in addition watching out for recent changes. Please let me know if you'd like me to undergo training and/or further regulatory practice first - and thank you for your consideration of me for this responsibility. ^^ TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 19:32, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

@TheMysteriousShadeheart The rollback permission is not required to use RedWarn or Ultraviolet. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 15:47, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
I see, I see; thanks for letting me know. Would I still be allowed to request rollback rights for the sake of utilizing these anti-vandalism tools to the utmost, or would you prefer I use RedWarn/Ultraviolet before making such a request (or, rather, the rollback-required AntiVandal)? In either instance I would still like to request the option of using rollback in the case of rollback-preferred cases of vandalism, which is - again - the primary reason I am making this request. TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 21:16, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
Hi TheMysteriousShadeheart, I'll grant rollback if you provide a list of five diffs where you have used, in practice, anything else than rollback (RedWarn, Ultraviolet, manual undo or whatever) and could have used the more performant, simple server-side rollback instead. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 04:06, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
(see WP:ROLLBACKUSE for the limitations of what these five diffs may be about) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:51, 30 November 2024 (UTC)
A sample of twenty-five (25) instances of manual undo are as follows (as the first method I learned, I have used it most frequently):
  1. Talk:Tui T. Sutherland: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  2. Wings of Fire (novel series): Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  3. Talk:MasterChef Canada: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  4. Wings of Fire (novel series): Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  5. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  6. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  7. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  8. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  9. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  10. Tui T. Sutherland: Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  11. Wings of Fire (novel series): Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  12. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  13. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  14. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  15. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  16. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  17. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  18. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  19. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  20. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  21. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  22. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  23. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  24. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
  25. Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
Edits such as the following one would have been much more serviceable with rollback (as in the case of many of the aforementioned edits):
  1. Wings of Fire (novel series): Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
On that note, the following edit - where I addressed WP:TALKOFFTOPIC - is one of my outlying contributions which clearly would constitutionally not require rollback; rather, page clean-up is a better solution:
  1. Talk:Wings of Fire (novel series): Difference between revisions - Wikipedia
The majority of my editing history has been through correcting overlooked errors/mistakes of minor significance on pages (ex. punctuation; spelling; spacing; formatting; cross-linking; broken citations; etc.).
Please note that edit discussions, when necessary, took place on page talk pages rather than user talk pages; I do not believe I have ever issued a talk page warning as other users typically did so before myself (though I am fully familiar with what is required/expected of in the practice).
(To clarify what I believe to be a point of concern, I believe several of these "users" could be the result of a sockfarm threat made here. It was quite a discussion with this user in the days before and as the sample of manual undos above indicate, I have spent much of my editing time focusing on targeted pages.)
Keeping in mind the limitations and responsibilities of WP:ROLLBACKUSE, I again thank you for your consideration of me for this privilege and power. ^^ TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 18:07, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
[Comment: Considering the differences between RedWarn, Ultraviolet, AntiVandal and other such anti-vandal tools, I'd gladly accept pointers/suggestions as to which would be believed the best course of action to pursue should I be granted the opportunity to use rollback. Please let me know if you have any other questions, comments or concerns.] TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 18:11, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
TheMysteriousShadeheart, thanks, hm. I didn't have a look at all examples, but the first 5 don't really look like the kind of obvious vandalism that can be rollbacked without an edit summary explaining the revert. I'm looking for five (but really just five) diffs where you undid obvious malicious editing, not someone's editing tests, not someone mistaking a talk page for a forum without wanting to harm the project. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:14, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for the fast reply - I believe the following twelve (12) instances all qualify (I've bolded the requested five): these can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here. TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 22:33, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
The list of dragon names removed in Special:Diff/1252791870 doesn't look like vandalism; same for Special:Diff/1222922750, where additionally the unnecessary changing of a phrasing was surely not meant to cause damage. I'll decline this request for now. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:24, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Understood - thanks for your consideration. I'll get more practice combating vandalism first; hopefully my editing slate will be more up to grade in the future! ^^ TheMysteriousShadeheart (talk) 02:35, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
Thanks – do feel free to ask again, perhaps in a month or so, simply on my talk page or here; if you choose this page here, please let me know and I'll either grant the request or leave the decision to someone else. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:29, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
 Not done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:25, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Royiswariii

I'm reapplying for rollback rights to continue supporting anti-vandalism efforts on Wikipedia after a misunderstanding that led to a false blocking and false accusations of violating WP:NOSHARE. I am committed to maintaining the integrity of articles and have prior experience using tools like Twinkle and Ultraviolet to tag and revert edits involving unnecessary soures or clear vandalism, often from IP address and new users.

Having rollback rights would allow me to contribute more effectively by streamlining the process of reverting disruptive edits and vandalism. I understand the responsibility that comes with this permission and I am fully prepared to take accountability for any incorrect reverts. I will be greater caution moving forward and use any mistakes as learning opportunities. Royiswariii Talk! 06:53, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:45, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

User:Sangsangaplaz

I am here to reapply for Rollback permission. I used to be pretty active when it came to patrolling Recent Changes but due to some password mismanagement I accidentally got locked out my own account. I was previously rejected by User:Fastily (I wish them a happy retirement) who told me to be active in Recent changes for a month or so more before requesting rollback permissions again. It hasn't been exactly a month but I think I have done enough to prove that I won't use rollback perms to vandalise or otherwise disrupt Wikipedia. I'm requesting rollback perms to use tools like AntiVandal or Huggle and have thoroughly read Wikipedia:Rollback policy. Sangsangaplaz (Talk to me! I'm willing to help) 10:49, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:46, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

User:2601AC47

My next logical request for permission, one that I don't suppose I can utilize alongside Ultraviolet to stop the bad faith one-timers and vandals where I watch. Although, I must admit, I should simultaneously take care to not get into any content dispute I see; I'll do my best not to get into one this way. Thanks for considering (again). 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

P.S.: as a sure guarantee my use of rollback is done safely and without causing any significant issue, I'll use Mr. Stradivarius' ConfirmRollback. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 01:45, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

User:MouseCursor

I would like rollback permissions to make fighting vandalism quicker and easier. I have been reverting vandalism for over 1 month and have experience with tools such as Twinkle and Ultraviolet. I would also like to be able to have access to Huggle to make my anti-vandalism experience easier. MouseCursor (talk) 13:46, 1 December 2024 (UTC)

User:SparklingBlueMoon

I would like to be able to access rollback tools to fight vandalism more effectively, I am familiar with Wikipedia's rules. SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 17:17, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Ybsone

Dealing with a lot of vandalism lately. Undoing, warning and reporting. Hope that undoing could be made easier with Rollback rights. YBSOne (talk) 20:21, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

User:MrBenjo

Hi, requesting rollback permission for my counter-vandalism efforts, as I would like to quickly remove obvious vandalism and to access helpful tools. I have been active in this area for several months here and even longer on dewiki. Therefore, I am familiar with the relevant guidelines and tools. With regards, –MrBenjo (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2024 (UTC) MrBenjo (talk) 15:44, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Nableezy

Would be used for reverting edits by blocked socks of banned users, similar to this request nableezy - 20:38, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Tres Libras

This permission will help me in combating vandalism. I’ve been actively patrolling recent changes, always warning users when necessary, assuming good faith, and taking full responsibility for all my edits. I also do crosswiki patrolling and recently joined the SWMT. — Tres Libras (talk) 21:03, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

User:MP1999

I am here to reapply for rollback permissions to assist in combating vandalism more efficiently. Over time, I have actively reverted vandalism using the "undo" tool and have familiarized myself with Wikipedia's policies, particularly vandalism and rollback.I fully understand that rollback should only be used for clear cases of vandalism, and I am committed to using the tool responsibly. My contributions reflect my dedication to maintaining Wikipedia's quality and integrity.If there are any concerns or further clarification needed regarding my request, please let me know. Thank you for considering my request.MP1999 ❯❯❯ Talk 11:03, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

User:Polygnotus

I would like to give Huggle and AntiVandal a try. Polygnotus (talk) 19:21, 4 December 2024 (UTC)

Footer

Policies and links

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Keeper76/dashboard&oldid=720126735"