Jump to content

Talk:Void

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Additions

[edit]

Should add the meaning to make a document, particularly a check, worthless. Void a check, or a voided check. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.72.170.97 (talk) 15:43, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

added it under Void (law)--Orange Mike 15:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Also Voids might be involve with darkness and give people dark powers.(TougHHead 06:53, 11 November 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Merge from The Void

[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
To not merge, given that the lists are sufficiently distinct and appropriately linked, with readers unlikely to be confused. Klbrain (talk) 13:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:DABCOMBINE. Skyerise (talk) 21:08, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support per my proposal to do that during the RM. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 09:18, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: consider that all of the entries on The Void are titled works that would rarely, if ever, be referred to as simply "Void". Such arrangements are not uncommon (e.g., The Truth and Truth (disambiguation)). WP:DABCOMBINE does not mandate combining such pages. olderwiser 10:48, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Agree with above comment. In this case, void and The Void are not necessarily interchangeable terms. And since both pages, but especially void, are moderately long, readers are probably best served by separate pages in this case. Station1 (talk) 21:13, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.