This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
Troye Sivan is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Blogging, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BloggingWikipedia:WikiProject BloggingTemplate:WikiProject BloggingBlogging articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ studiesLGBTQ studies articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject South Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of South Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.South AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject South AfricaTemplate:WikiProject South AfricaSouth Africa articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject YouTube, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of YouTube and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YouTubeWikipedia:WikiProject YouTubeTemplate:WikiProject YouTubeYouTube articles
AussieWikiDan, I'm a bit uncomfortable with your revert of 2600:8801:a201:7501:c970:4ad9:3e9e:8ece's edit, though I agree that the sources that they removed should be retained in the article. They left an edit summary that read Troye never said he was an atheist and, having read the four sources, I agree with them. The closest I get is the news.com.au article, where Sivan is quoted as saying "I'm Jewish, but I’m not religious... I want my family to have the same experiences I had growing up, of going to synagogue on a Friday night without being looked at weirdly...I pushed it away and ultimately became a little bit less of a religious person.". I don't think that's enough to support the statement that Sivan has identified as an atheist. I'd suggest changing the sentence to read "Sivan was brought up in an orthodox Jewish family – ... – but does not consider himself to be religious.", with the segment between the em-dashes being retained. What do you think? I shall leave a note for 2600... inviting them to give their thoughts too. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 20:17, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, thanks for bringing this to my attention. I have looked at the four articles again. I also can not find anything different than what you have outlined.
Another editor previously removed this and looking at the sources I found reference to him saying (or the reporter inferring) that he was an atheist. However, I can't find that - so I'm a bit confused.
I think editing the article's wording with what you have suggested is a great idea.
Thank you again and especially for being so civil :)
Hi! Sivan's full name is given at the very start of the article, so I've added a "known professionally as" note in the lead sentence. The article is not protected so you could have made that change yourself. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 07:13, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I'm curious why adding someone's dating history is considered "unencyclopedic" when vast numbers of celebrities on this website have dating histories included on their articles, indeed the text I added was nearly verbatim from Jacob Bixenman's own profile @Joeyconnick:Nevermore27 (talk) 23:42, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In and of itself, who someone is dating at any giving point is not "lasting" information. It's gossip and/or "news". Does it impact the subject's overall course of life? Maybe if it leads to children or some kind of career-related collaboration, or to allegations of abuse, but otherwise who someone dated for X years in their 20s is irrelevant if we look back at them from the perspective of 20, 30, 40, or more years into the future. We aren't the entertainment press... we aren't concerned with people's private lives unless their private life somehow impacts their overall notability (or, as before, has some kind of formal/tangible impact on the course of their life). But just "they dated", he had a cameo in a video, and then (my fave part) they "reportedly" split—we don't report rumours even if the rest of the info were worthy of inclusion, which again... it isn't.
For instance, a good test: do you need to know anything about Jacob Bixenman to have a full, general layperson understanding of Troye Sivan and his career? No, you don't. Just because something happened and that something was recorded somewhere doesn't mean it's suitable for inclusion, per WP:INDISCRIMINATE.
As for what other articles have in them, well... that's Wikipedia for you. It's pretty common to be able to spin around and find any number of articles that aren't following guidelines. Just because, say, an article doesn't follow MOS:TV or WP:BLP doesn't mean that we can point to those articles and say, "Well they're doing it, so why can't we do in article X?" If that were a valid exercise, what would be the point of guidelines at all? —Joeyconnick (talk)