Jump to content

Talk:Sarah Bryant (Virtua Fighter)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSarah Bryant (Virtua Fighter) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 5, 2015Articles for deletionKept
April 18, 2023Articles for deletionMerged
May 6, 2023Articles for deletionKept
May 25, 2023Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 14, 2023.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that as an Easter egg, the color of Sarah Bryant's earring changes depending on the fighting stage in which the player is engaged?
Current status: Good article
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Sarah Bryant (Virtua Fighter). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:59, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move May 3, 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Consensus is this page is not the primary topic for the name "Sarah Bryant" and should not be moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) SkyWarrior 13:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Given the views before Sarah Bryant was redirected due to notability. I think she should be the primary. GlatorNator (ᴛ) 12:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Sarah Bryant (Virtua Fighter)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 00:48, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Infobox

  1. Voice talent should be mentioned in the article in some way if possible
  2. Her fighting style is not mentioned in the article, and her location is only mentioned in the lead and infobox
    1. Fixed

Lead

  1. Should mention Yu Suzuki's role as the creator
    1. Fixed

Conception and design

  1. It says Suzuki wouldn't comment on whether she's based on a real person; is the article saying he wouldn't comment on whether she's based on a real human being? It sounds like the article is referring to Sarah Conner as a real person.
    1. Fixed
  2. Consider paraphrasing the quotes a bit more (mainly the Suzuki quote)
    1. Fixed
  3. "While she has had a wide variety of secondary outfits as the series progressed, her main design has been used through the series and in promotional material, only seeing minimal change through the years." - Unsourced
    1. Fixed

In other media

  1. I assume the "tongue-in-cheek" mention comes from the source?
    1. Fixed to be clearer that that comes from the source.

Reception

  1. I feel like "Official Sega Saturn Magazine described her as "one of the most brilliant creations in the world of video games", praising her as a "brainwashed maniac" but further emphasizing their like of her breast size, comparing them to Lara Croft's and describing Sarah's as "larger and better defined"." could be improved. For example: "Official Sega Saturn Magazine described her as "one of the most brilliant creations in the world of video games", praising the brainwashing plot and her breast size." I don't think it's really important that they're bigger than Lara's, y'know? Just means that he likes bigger tiddy.
    1. Yeah I think I was leaning too heavily into the Croft comparison due to the time it was posted. Should be a lot better now.
  2. "true original; until Max Headroom becomes a polygon fighter, she'll be the oldest popular character of her type." Not sure what this means!
    1. Dug up the issue and paraphrased it better to make the comparison clearer between her and later characters.

Image

  1. Image looks a bit poopy
  2. Fair use rationale for the infobox image is invalid
    1. Fixed and fixed.

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 19:29, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

Improved to Good Article status by Kung Fu Man (talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke (talk) at 00:58, 31 May 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Sarah Bryant (Virtua Fighter); consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • No copyvio, proper length, promoted to GA exactly 7 days before nomination, QPQ fulfilled, ALT1 preferred for being more interesting, offline source verified. 〜 Festucalex • talk 18:35, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Sarah_Bryant_(Virtua_Fighter)&oldid=1218486389"