Talk:Nica Noelle

This article was nominated for deletion on 30 October 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Jackiesshrink (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (declared here)

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

LGBTQ studies: Person

	LGBTQ portal This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ studiesLGBTQ studies
	This article is supported by the LGBTQ Person task force.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Personal life

Per this edit, if HW took the time to really read the article, s/he would realize that the information about Noelle's relationship with Satine Phoenix isn't sourced from just any "retailer hype page"; the retailer is Noelle's own company. Sorry if I sound harsh, HW, but the disputes on your talk page make me wonder why you're often so cynical with your removal of content. Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 05:55, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retailer hype is retailer hype. Fails WP:BLP and WP:RS. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 13:40, 29 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Response to third opinion request:

I don't see any grounds for complaints about BLP here, since the information is something that the subject herself claims to be true. The only exception would be if Satine Phoenix has said somewhere that it's not true - the mere claim that a porn actress is in a relationship with another woman does not seem to me to be inherently libellous.

The question, therefore, is as to whether the subject is a RS about herself, given that the website is essentially a self-published source. The criterion that applies here is whether "the material is... unduly self-serving". Given the context, it's entirely possible that this is promotional, but I don't think it's unduly self-serving, in a way that a statement such as "...is one of the greatest porn actresses in recent history" might be, or even (say) what her claimed favourite sexual positions are. I would recommend making the source of the information more explicit, by saying something such as "according to her official website..." That way the claim is entirely factual (her website does indeed say that) and readers can then judge for themselves whether or not they find it plausible.—Anaxial (talk) 07:43, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So noted. OAN: Phoenix's Facebook profile states that she is married, so I gather she and Noelle are former lovers. I'll fix that. Erpert ^{Who is this guy? | Wanna talk about it?} 04:49, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Nica Noelle

Cyberbot II has detected links on Nica Noelle which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.sexherald.com/interview-sex-professionals/behind_the_scenes_with_nica_noelle__sweetheart_v.html
Triggered by \bsexherald\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:00, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Nica Noelle. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]