This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Boxing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Boxing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoxingWikipedia:WikiProject BoxingTemplate:WikiProject BoxingBoxing articles
This article includes what seem to me to be lengthy editorial positions. It should be rewritten in a more detached tone. Dkostic (talk) 04:15, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I updated the article and removed a lot of the editorial pieces. Those editorial pieces were actually copied from the journal that I referenced. I believe that, now, the article has a somewhat encyclopedic tone as well as more neutrality (I added the criticisms). If others agree, please remove the flags--I'm still new with Wikipedia so I don't know what the requirements to remove a flag is. Thanks! Rbblack2013 (talk) 01:20, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
