Talk:Mike O'Meara Show

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

merge suggestion

Is Robb Spewak notable enough to warrant his own article? It's hard finding any 3rd party sources other than the couple that mention him in passing but are focused on Don Geronimo's retirement. Even though he's playing a much larger role and getting more airtime on the Mike O'Meara Show I'm thinking that merging this article into that show article would be best. --Rtphokie (talk) 00:18, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you're wrong and being nit-picky. On the other hand, since Beth Ann was taken off of here for being non-notable, you just as well take everyone else off of it, too. This place is so screwed up. Manimal22 13:14, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have similar concerns about Robb's notability. Merging into the main show article would prevent that article from facing deletion.--Rtphokie (talk) 18:33, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, merging it into the main article (which is a good idea) would enable the article's deletion. Don't go all Summer's Eve on us again. Enough of your socialist doubletalk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.200.32.170 (talk) 02:47, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Whatever. Manimal22 10:5, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Any issues with merging Joe Ardinger and Mike O'Meara articles into this, the main show article, under the personalities header.--Rtphokie (talk) 20:03, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

joe ardinger has his own radio show. he's totally notable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.171.148.242 (talk) 21:20, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He also RUNS the power-washing game in Northern Virginia.

The merge isn't finished until you've done the editing (you merge, you edit). There's a lot of rrrrrrepittttion in the Spewak section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.88.229.196 (talk) 18:27, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just glanced at this page as a big fan of the show. I would like it to be noted that you say Buzz likes the chronic. Chronic means pot laced with crack, which he never claims to have used. I would suggest changing that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.204.55.22 (talk) 12:15, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article reads like something from the show website. This needs massive revision--Wikipedia is not about cutesy, and this article is cutesy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by SordidBusiness (talk • contribs) 14:03, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Citation and Vandalism

If anyone knows where we can get a source for the uncited material on Buzz's section, please let me know or list it on the page. Also, if you do not like the show, it would be best if you do not even bother wasting the time to vandalize the page because I will report you. This applies to the users with IP 68.51.124.133 and 24.7.10.33. --Psychoscientist (talk) 07:13, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck you, just a little bit.

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mike O'Meara Show. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]