Talk:Live. Love. ASAP

Live. Love. ASAP has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 24, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:LiveLoveA$AP/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Rp0211 (talk · contribs) 18:02, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects):
b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Infobox

No issues

Lead

LiveLoveA$AP is the debut mixtape by American rapper A$AP Rocky... → Have the sentence end here to comply with WP:BEGINNING
Allmusic editor Andre Barnes dubs LiveLoveA$AP "the antithesis of conscious rap" and a "guilty pleasure" for hip hop purists.[1] → Put general attitude of reviewers toward the album, not just one

Background

In August, Rocky followed with "Peso"... → Specify year

Composition

No issues

Release and promotion

No issues

Reception

No issues

Track listing

No issues

Personnel

No issues

Release history

Make sure to include sources to verify all of this information

References

Put the references into two separate columns to make it more organized

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. There are some minor issues that are keeping the article from reaching good article status. I will give you the general seven days to fix these mistakes and/or address issues you believe do not affect good article status. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 18:30, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

All album articles on Wikipedia, particularly the ones passed through GA/FA, have the first sentence as is, with the release date and label at the end. Although there's nothing about external consistency among articles in any guidelines, I don't see what WP:Beginning says that it should be otherwise, and since it's a release, it kind of suits that subject of the article.
Revised reviewer statement.
Specified year.
Reverted editor who added "Release history".
sep. columns. Dan56 (talk) 19:55, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to WP:BEGINNING, "If possible, the page title should be the subject of the first sentence." Therefore, in this instance, it should say what number of album it is and who it is written by. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 20:05, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Doesnt "debut" indicate what number it is? Dan56 (talk) 20:23, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, "debut" does indicate what album it is for an artist. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 21:17, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Anything else? Dan56 (talk) 16:54, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since all issues have been addressed, I feel confident passing this article. Congratulations and keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 17:30, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]