Talk:List of female United States Cabinet members

List of female United States Cabinet members is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured list on July 4, 2011.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 20, 2009	Featured list candidate	Promoted

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Mid-importance).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Gender studies

This article is part of WikiProject Gender studies. This WikiProject aims to improve the quality of articles dealing with gender studies and to remove systematic gender bias from Wikipedia. If you would like to participate in the project, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Gender studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Gender studiesTemplate:WikiProject Gender studiesGender studies articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : see Unassessed Gender studies articles and Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
Cleanup : edit to see
Collaborate : see /Collaboration
Copyedit : edit to see
Deletion sorting : see /Sexuality and gender
Expand : edit to see
Infobox : see Gender studies articles needing infoboxes
Merge : edit to see
Notability : edit to see
NPOV : edit to see
Orphans : Brannon Masculinity Scale · Holy Virility · Media and gender · Michael Kaufman (author) · Women's education in Saudi Arabia
Photo : see Wikipedia requested photographs of gender studies
Split : History of feminism
Stubs : see Gender studies stubs
Translate : see /translation
Update : edit to see
Verify : Riot grrrl
Needs attention : see Gender studies articles needing attention

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

When?

When should this get updated for Obama's cabinet? Before or after he is inaugurated? BobAmnertiopsis ∴_ChatMe! 23:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

At least after the Senate confirms his nominees.—Chris! _ct 23:59, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Things to address before TFL

Are they really "female-appointed" or just females who have been appointed? Disagrees with the blurb. Fixed
Vaguely confused by the # col. This relates directly to the position they held, so why is it separate from that column? Done
Year appointed doesn't sort correctly in both tables (because the dashes). Fixed

The Rambling Man (talk) 15:10, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cite news to cite web

Therequiembellishere Why are you reformatting Template:Cite news templates to Template:Cite web templates? Mitchumch (talk) 08:03, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was under the impression that they were functionally the same template now, particularly for url cites. Therequiembellishere (talk) 08:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Therequiembellishere: I was not aware of this change. I researched it further and found "Choosing between {{Cite web}} and {{Cite news}}" on the Template:Cite web article.

I also wanted to ask why you're adding Trumps Cabinet picks within Template:Hidden to this article, List of foreign-born United States Cabinet Secretaries, and List of African-American United States Cabinet Secretaries? No one knows who will be confirmed to the position, therefore their gender, ancestry, or place of birth is unknown. I had to remove content on 09:15, 26 December 2016‎ in part because "cabinet picks do not equal senate confirmed secretaries".

I also wanted to let you know your edits to this article broke citation number 34 and produced an improperly coded "Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare" row in the Defunct departments section. Mitchumch (talk) 08:59, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

None of those refs were affected by the switch, right? I don't recall any of the few differing parameters. The hidden Trump nominees are just to make things easier and to potentially prevent less experienced editors from fully adding them without proper qualification. If they aren't approved, the hidden sections are removed with no change for the casual reader and if they are, their entry is prepared to go. I understand WP:CRYSTAL, but I do think some degree of reasonable expectation shouldn't precluding a hidden inclusion at a minimum. These are unconventional times, but there is no filibuster and 52 Republican Senators. While something surprising could certainly occur, it is rather more a game of when and not if these appointees will be confirmed.

Apologies for the oversight, fixed now. Therequiembellishere (talk) 09:18, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Therequiembellishere: Essentially, it is WP:CRYSTAL within Template:Hidden. The hidden note doesn't change what it is. If you can't provide a citation for the assertion, then it doesn't belong in an article. If you want to make it easier for less experienced editors, then create a blank version. But, the filled-in version needs to be removed. Mitchumch (talk) 10:59, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of female United States Cabinet Secretaries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:43, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of female United States Cabinet Secretaries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:16, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cabinet level

I propose spinning off "Females who have held cabinet-level positions" into it's own list. This is a featured list. Adding two names of cabinet level department heads is very far from complete. Not only that, but the lead would need to be changed as well. I think it makes more sense to do another list because there is a distinction between cabinet members and non-cabinet members. In the alternative, I would suggest compiling the cabinet-level women in a sandbox or draft space before adding them to this list. Knope7 (talk) 00:26, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Image FrancesPerkinsAfterRooseveltsDeath.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:51, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 January 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved (non-admin closure) (t · c) buidhe 19:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

List of female United States Cabinet Secretaries → List of female United States Cabinet members – After recent edits adding then removing members of the Cabinet/nominees who do not have the title of secretary (OMB, Trade rep, EPA, etc.), I see no reason to exclude them. They are just as much official members of the Cabinet leading their own agencies, just not executive departments. Official White House pages like The Cabinet (and those of his predecessors) do not make any distinction between a supposed "full cabinet" and "cabinet-level". Reywas92^Talk 19:10, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Support it makes sense to have a list of female cabinet members who aren't cabinet secretaries somewhere, and that place would be here. I disagree with the claim that there's "no distinction", Presidents have free reign to add and remove members who are not Cabinet Secretaries, and only Cabinet Secretaries are in the line of succession. 75.162.124.147 (talk) 02:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Terrible Changes

Cabinet Secretaries is U.S. equivalent to government ministers in other contries and this posts cant be removed, while cabinet-level officials are not and may be elevated or removed on the wish of the President, see comically example when Donald Trump put UN Ambassador in Cabinet-Level and removed position one year later. Same with Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency or Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, Cabinet-Level in Clinton, Obama, and Biden administrations but demolished by Bush and Trump in their Cabinets. And list can go on.

Why deleted United States presidential line of succession for Secretaries? Diopic (talk) 10:48, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]