The contents of the Danny Keough page were merged into Lisa Marie Presley on 30 October 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.
Danny Keough was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 25 October 2024 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Lisa Marie Presley. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Lisa Marie Presley article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elvis Presley, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Elvis PresleyWikipedia:WikiProject Elvis PresleyTemplate:WikiProject Elvis PresleyElvis Presley
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michael Jackson, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Michael Jackson on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Michael JacksonWikipedia:WikiProject Michael JacksonTemplate:WikiProject Michael JacksonMichael Jackson
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
Lisa Marie Presley is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2023, when it received 14,812,928 views.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report4 times. The weeks in which this happened:
I don't generally understand why images get changed on a person's death, but in this case the reason was that the original image was blurry compared to the new image. While the resolution of the older images has been improved, it is still nine years older than the newer image, so I doubt that changing it back will be seen as an improvement. If you know of an image that supports our image policies, then we would be able to consider using it. --Super Goku V (talk) 07:19, 16 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I completely agree about changing the image. My boyfriend mentioned that the lead image was really unflattering, and I completely agreed. I wanted to use the Pepsi 400 one, and checked Wikimedia Commons, where the URL was not currently working. I added a corroborating source that the image was taken by DoD, and then changed the lead image. I think it honors the person who recently died by using an image of how she looked when she was alive. I think the two images of her later in life aren't ideal images to be the first one to pop up at the beginning of the article, but the Pepsi 400 one is much better, IMHO. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:47, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I like the Pepsi 400 image that is there now. In spite of various comments since her death, I don't think Lisa looked well for a long time. Not just recently. — Maile (talk) 22:13, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that the 2005 Pepsi 400 image is probably the best for now. The 2014 image is very fuzzy in its original version and is still incredibly unflattering after its gratuitous editing in its current incarnation (there's a visible box of what was edited that can be seen when viewing the full photo, too). The 2006 image isn't terrible but considering it's not much newer than the 2005 Pepsi 400 image, I think the Pepsi 400 one is more suitable. Breaktheicees (talk) 19:21, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
All Lisa said in the Playboy interview is that "he made his attempts at coming into [her] room and being inappropriate while drunk."
Referring to pervy behavior as "abuse" is an embellishment. The references to Edwards should be removed from the early life section since we don't know all the details. Strangerthings7112 (talk) 07:48, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies about first edit, but this tab seems to have been partially written as if it were a PR blurb - also, is PCF the correct title or the organization? The Elvis says that an organization known as The Elvis Presley Charitable Foundation has existed since the 80s under a different name, is this the same org or something unrelated? 71.172.19.223 (talk) 00:25, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Only child" is unambiguous. If we write "only daughter", then the natural question is: "What? Did he have a son or sons?" "Daughter" is bad writing, since it suggests to the reader that something has been left out of the article (something is hidden). tgeorgescu (talk) 04:18, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
