This article was nominated for deletion on 24 March 2019. The result of the discussion was keep.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the L. Whitney Clayton article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mormonism and the Latter Day Saint movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latter Day Saint movementWikipedia:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementTemplate:WikiProject Latter Day Saint movementLatter Day Saint movement
This article has been marked as needing a freely-licensed image to replace a copyrighted images, to comply with Wikipedia's policy for non-free content of living people. Many copyright-free image sources are listed at public domain image resources, you could create your own, or you may request permission from the copyright holder of the original images to release them under a free license. – The Free Image Search Tool may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
ChristensenMJ tweaked the wording I had added about Elder Clayton's brother Weatherford's call as a general authority seventy. As always, his attention to details and making articles the best they can be is phenomenal. However, while no sources have been cited to prove this relationship, articles about Weatherford T. Clayton just happen to mention his parent's names, which just happen to be the same names as have been listed for L. Whitney Clayton. Unless I'm wrong, having the same parents does make them brothers, which is a unique happenstance in the Church. The last time brothers served together in the Seventy was when Douglas L. Calllister's brother Tad was sustained to the same quorum. They would serve together in that quorum for the next several years. So it is unique to have Weatherford T. and L. Whitney Clayton serving together in the Seventy. Weatherford T. is L. Whitney's younger brother by a few years. If/when an article is created for Weatherford T., this should also be included in that article. Hope that addresses your concerns, ChristensenMJ. Thanks for the great work!--Jgstokes (talk) 23:07, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for your kind words, Jgstokes. I am presuming you are trying to be humorous, because I believe I certainly get the fact that having the same parents would make someone brothers. All my edit summary note said was the source you included, the Newsroom article, not only makes no reference whatsoever to the name of his parents, the parents of L. Whitney Clayton are also not mentioned in this WP article. So, as you noted above, no sources were cited, that is the nature of my edit summary comment. If I was attempting to dispute the addition, I would have removed it, or at a minimum added a cn tag. Thanks for all you do! ChristensenMJ (talk) 03:51, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I was trying to be humorous. I got that. I now have a source for the fact that they are brothers: a Church News article that specifically mentions this. The article can be found here. I will add that citation to the article for verification. Thanks. --Jgstokes (talk) 00:16, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]