Talk:Kenneth Baker, Baron Baker of Dorking

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kenneth Baker, Baron Baker of Dorking article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Peerage and Baronetage / Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Peerage and Baronetage (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

University of Oxford Low‑importance

	University of Oxford portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Oxford, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the University of Oxford on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of OxfordWikipedia:WikiProject University of OxfordTemplate:WikiProject University of OxfordUniversity of Oxford
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Dangerous Dogs Act

It could just as well be stated the the introduction of the dangerous dogs acts was a triumph. I recall there being opposition at the time, as with many pieces of legislation though. Surely this needs to go as POV? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gomez2002 (talk • contribs) 14:08, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It became a byword for kneejerk, ineffective legislation. IIRC lots of harmless dogs ended up getting put down and lots of dangerous ones were not covered by the Act. And it's not "POV" to report somebody else's opinion, especially if that opinion was important and widely-held. Paulturtle (talk) 11:26, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Current position

"Nowadays he is working at New York University - USA and The University of Sydney - Australia as First Professor of International Negotiations and Political Science."

Is this correct? Baker doesn't appear to be listed on the staff of either institution. Espresso Addict (talk) 19:38, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As no-one has responded here or provided references for this material I have removed it. If you restore it, please add reliable references. Espresso Addict (talk) 17:46, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Religion

I think he once mentioned that he would like to have been a priest if he had not been a politican. Was he a catholic? Drutt (talk) 20:09, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kenneth Baker, Baron Baker of Dorking. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131017193633/http://www1.plymouth.ac.uk/graduation/honorarydegrees/honoraries2013/Pages/The Right Honourable Lord Baker of Dorking CH PC.aspx to http://www1.plymouth.ac.uk/graduation/honorarydegrees/honoraries2013/Pages/The Right Honourable Lord Baker of Dorking CH PC.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:09, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]