Talk:Harescombe
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Drive by tagging
[edit]I notice this article has already been drive-by tagged as having unreferenced information. There is no need for references as, thus far, there is nothing in the article that can possibly be referenced. As per WP:References:
- Cite sources when
- adding or restoring material that is challenged or likely to be challenged,
- quoting someone, with or without quotation marks, or closely paraphasing a source,
- summarizing source material in your own words, in order to give credit to the source of your ideas,
- uploading an image.
I don't see that simply stating the existence of a village requires a reference. It is unlikely to be challenged as the existence of the village is verifiable, I am not quoting anyone, I am not drawing on any source and there is no image involved. WP is being ruined by mindless drive-by tagging. Alex McKee (talk) 10:24, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Harescombe Church.jpg to appear as POTD
[edit]Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:Harescombe Church.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on July 11, 2013. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2013-07-11. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:35, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
Date of construction of St. Church of John the Baptist
[edit]The article states that the Church of St. John the Baptist in Harescombe "was constructed in the early 13th century. It was consecrated in 1315." The 13th century consisted of the 100 year period from 1201 through 1300. Either they waited a hundred years before consecrating the church, or the church was constructed in the early 14th century (the 100 year period from 1301 through 1400). -- Bob (Bob99 (talk) 22:05, 11 July 2013 (UTC))
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Harescombe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304111439/https://neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadKeyFigures.do?a=7&b=11124229&c=GL6 6NL&d=16&e=62&g=6428093&i=1001x1003x1032x1004&m=0&r=0&s=1427808498096&enc=1 to https://neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk/dissemination/LeadKeyFigures.do?a=7&b=11124229&c=GL6 6NL&d=16&e=62&g=6428093&i=1001x1003x1032x1004&m=0&r=0&s=1427808498096&enc=1
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111216055827/http://www.stroud.gov.uk/info/listed_buildings/harescombe.pdf to http://www.stroud.gov.uk/info/listed_buildings/harescombe.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:21, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:26, 8 December 2022 (UTC)