Talk:Federalist No. 8/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Thebiguglyalien (talk · contribs) 01:57, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: The Blue Rider (talk · contribs) 14:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

The Blue Rider, this has been open for a month and a half now. Where are we at on finishing the review? Thebiguglyalien (talk) 02:23, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

You can already start acting on my suggestions. The Blue Rider 23:41, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

The Blue Rider Done, but you didn't answer my question. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:52, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

The Blue Rider I've responded to the new points. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:22, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

@The Blue Rider, have you done a source check for this review yet? -- asilvering (talk) 00:49, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

I believe other user already did a source check. The Blue Rider 19:27, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Stability

• Last edit on 1 of May and no edit wars in place; pass.

Image

• Correct copyright tag and suitable caption; pass.

Copyvio

• 3,8%; pass.

Lead

• Everything looks good, I would only suggest to add a sentence or two about the aftermath.
  • Done.

Summary

• Add a note explaining that Publius is a pseudonym used by James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay.
  • It already says that Publius is the pseudonym used to write the Federalist Papers. A general description of Publius belongs on the main Federalist Papers article.
• How many states existed at the time of writing? Maybe clarify that if relevant.
  • Not sure if it's relevant, the point is that there are several that could come into conflict with one another.
• A standing army for each state? If so clarify that, or put in the plural as you do in the next phrase.
  • Clarified in each case whether it's a national army or state armies.
• Comma after "invaded" and before "which". Likewise, when describing the army of a nation infrequently invaded.
  • Added.

Background and publication

• Here you link standing army but the first instance is in the "Summary" section.
  • Fixed.

Analysis

Standing army

• The correlation is positive or negative?
  • Specified an "increase".
• Why did the modern advancements in industry made it difficult for men to give up their occupations to go to war?
  • Switched to "obligations in industry".
• "Conversely, he acknowledged that this expansion of industry is what allowed advancements in warfare to develop", why is that so?
  • Specified "technological advancements".
• Comma after "describe it".
  • Not sure what this is referring to.

Geographical advantage

• Everything seems good here.

Aftermath

• Is valor referencing virtue ethics? If so a wikilink would be useful. (optional)
  • I don't believe it is.

Source

• Done by 48JCL (see past revisions).

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.