Jump to content

Talk:East Carolina University

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleEast Carolina University was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 21, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
March 20, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
May 6, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
June 24, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
July 15, 2007Good article nomineeListed
February 20, 2010Good article reassessmentKept
November 21, 2024Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Four properties

[edit]

"The nine undergraduate colleges, graduate school, and four professional schools are located on these four properties." I assume that this refers to the Main Campus, Health Sciences Campus, West Research Campus,and the Field Station for Coastal Studies. but nothing has established these 4 as a group before this mention.--User:Khajidha (talk) (contributions) 19:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gwen potter accounting emeritus professor

[edit]

I was browsing about miss potter and i wasprivelaged to read she be favorite accounting professor 26 years after her retirement. 2603:6080:F3F0:360:117C:AF0B:3C6D:5D96 (talk) 02:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

  • There are several uncited passages throughout the article.
  • The "History" section is too short and needs to be split into multiple paragraphs.
  • "Notable alumni" needs to be split into paragraphs for readability.
  • "Rankings" is outdated and does not include information in the 2020s.

Is anyone interested in fixing up this article, or should it go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 02:52, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:19, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are several uncited passages throughout the article. The "History" section is too short and needs to be split into multiple paragraphs. "Notable alumni" needs to be split into paragraphs for readability. "Rankings" is outdated and does not include information in the 2020s. Z1720 (talk) 02:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I took a spin through the article and fixed several obvious errors. The glaring nature of the deficiencies likely indicates that saving this would be far more work than I have the capacity to take on currently. Sdkbtalk 05:18, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.