Talk:Ciudad de la Costa
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article contains a translation of Ciudad de la Costa from es.wikipedia. |
Copy of discussion
[edit]I copy here a discussion about the status of the various localities of Ciudad de la Costa:
- I have a question about the status of the subdivisions of the Ciudad de la Costa. Someone has categorized Shangrilá as Category:Neighbourhoods in Uruguay. I know that before Ciudad de la Costa became officially recognized as a "city", all its parts were "balnearios". I hear them still named as such today. Is there any indication that now they are considered neighbourhoods of the new city? I don't see any other wikipedia doing this distinction, but of course all these articles are still in development. Otherwise it does make sense that the parts of a city are called neighbourhoods. The only thing I am worried is that we don't invent things we are not sure about. Hoverfish Talk 01:53, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, Hoverfish! I've entered the Canelones Department government website, which is the official in all these cases and its word must be taken as such, and I've found that Solymar, Parque Carrasco, etc, are spoken of as localidades and not as barrios. Besides, this page also works with information which belongs to the INE (Instituto Nacional de Estadística), a source of the Uruguayan Government. Therefore, I assume that they should be categorized as populated places or something, because the government does so. However, whenever possible, I refer to these places just as "seaside resorts" which are part of the Ciudad de la Costa. --Góngora (Talk) 12:02, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Ciudad de la Costa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120312024255/http://www.observa.com.uy/Municipales2010/nota.aspx?id=96430&ex=33&ar=1&fi=39 to http://www.observa.com.uy/Municipales2010/nota.aspx?id=96430&ex=33&ar=1&fi=39
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121010041513/http://www.ine.gub.uy/censos2011/resultadosfinales/cuadros/NIVEL DEPARTAMENTAL/Canelones/P_3_CAN.xls to http://www.ine.gub.uy/censos2011/resultadosfinales/cuadros/NIVEL DEPARTAMENTAL/Canelones/P_3_CAN.xls
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120907041709/http://www.ine.gub.uy:80/censos2011/resultadosfinales/canelones.html to http://www.ine.gub.uy/censos2011/resultadosfinales/canelones.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121010041513/http://www.ine.gub.uy/censos2011/resultadosfinales/cuadros/NIVEL DEPARTAMENTAL/Canelones/P_3_CAN.xls to http://www.ine.gub.uy/censos2011/resultadosfinales/cuadros/NIVEL DEPARTAMENTAL/Canelones/P_3_CAN.xls
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:05, 25 November 2016 (UTC)