Talk:2011 NATO attack in Pakistan
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2011 NATO attack in Pakistan article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about 2011 NATO attack in Pakistan. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about 2011 NATO attack in Pakistan at the Reference desk. |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
This article is written in Pakistani English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
2011 NATO attack in Pakistan has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
A news item involving this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "In the news" column on November 27, 2011. | ||||||||||
Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on November 26, 2012, November 26, 2016, November 26, 2021, and November 26, 2022. |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from Pakistan–United States skirmishes was copied or moved into 2011 NATO attack in Pakistan with this edit on 27 November 2011. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
A summary of this article appears in Pakistan–United States skirmishes. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 10 external links on 2011 NATO attack in Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://ftpapp.app.com.pk/en_/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=167119&Itemid=1 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141129115409/http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-6-91995-Pakistan-may-restore-Nato-supplies-on-new-terms to http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-6-91995-Pakistan-may-restore-Nato-supplies-on-new-terms
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426005053/http://newsweekpakistan.com/scope/612 to http://newsweekpakistan.com/scope/612
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111128231518/http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16118154 to http://news.sky.com/home/world-news/article/16118154
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140715092400/http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2011/11/26/nato-attacked-pak-check-post-bonn-conference-0 to http://www.asiantribune.com/news/2011/11/26/nato-attacked-pak-check-post-bonn-conference-0
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.irna.ir/News/Politic/Pakistan-postpones-reopening-of-NATO-supply-line/80085125 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140811094812/http://www.rttnewsradio.com/Content/ArticleView.aspx?Id=1779063&CID=1&SimRec=5 to http://www.rttnewsradio.com/Content/ArticleView.aspx?Id=1779063&CID=1&SimRec=5
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011\12\02\story_2-12-2011_pg7_8 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111128004239/http://www.thenews.com.pk/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=27348&title=JUI-condemns-NATO-attack,-demands-independent-foreign-policy to http://www.thenews.com.pk/NewsDetail.aspx?ID=27348&title=JUI-condemns-NATO-attack,-demands-independent-foreign-policy
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://uk.news.yahoo.com/video/reutersworldnews-1695328/outrage-in-kashmir-over-nato-strike-on-pakistan-27548004.html - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/20111201_04.html - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150402103929/http://stagingarchives.dailytimes.com.pk/lahore/05-Dec-2011/religious-scholars-condemn-nato-attack-on-army-checkpost to http://stagingarchives.dailytimes.com.pk/lahore/05-Dec-2011/religious-scholars-condemn-nato-attack-on-army-checkpost
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120424035410/http://pakobserver.net/detailnews.asp?id=127976 to http://pakobserver.net/detailnews.asp?id=127976
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2011\12\01\story_1-12-2011_pg7_9 - Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.irna.ir/ENNewsShow.aspx?NID=30687714&SRCH=1 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120424035415/http://pakobserver.net/detailnews.asp?id=127616 to http://pakobserver.net/detailnews.asp?id=127616
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://ftpapp.app.com.pk/en_/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=168795&Itemid=39 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130615082242/http://www.indianmuslimobserver.com/2011/12/nato-terrorism-in-pakistan-is-pakistani.html to http://www.indianmuslimobserver.com/2011/12/nato-terrorism-in-pakistan-is-pakistani.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:18, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on 2011 NATO attack in Pakistan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426070909/http://pakistan.onepakistan.com/news/city/21178-jco-laid-to-rest-at-native-village-with-full-military-honour.html to http://pakistan.onepakistan.com/news/city/21178-jco-laid-to-rest-at-native-village-with-full-military-honour.html
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/11074699-denmark-calls-on-pakistani-foreign-minister-for-condolences-on-the-nato-strike-on-pakistani-military-personnel - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090408090052/http://www.workersliberty.org/node/7124 to http://www.workersliberty.org/node/7124
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:15, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
Adding quote by Chinese general Ma Xiaotian
[edit]In a meeting with US officials about this event, Chinese general Ma Xiaotian sarcastically remarked "Were you using the wrong maps again?", referring to the 1999 US bombing of the Chinese embassy in Belgrade, which the US blamed on faulty maps, but which China has always suspected was deliberate.
This telling remark was made in an official meeting, and the incident was directly compared to one of the most sensitive events in US-China relations (US bombing of Chinese embassy in Belgrade), as the sources seem to agree. It is a data point that indicates how China saw the event and relations with the US/NATO. Observers have commented on this remark, calling it "jibbing" and "priceless". I suggest we include it on this page.
Sources:
https://jamestown.org/program/china-and-nato-grappling-with-beijings-hopes-and-fears/
https://web.archive.org/web/20121117053251/http://blog.gmfus.org/2012/05/23/seizing-opportunities-with-a-less-reserved-beijing/
(by Andrew Small, author of the definitive book on China-Pakistan relations)
http://indiaschinablog.blogspot.com/2012/07/quote-of-day-mapping-lie.html
We should include this remark on this page, as it adds to the readers' understanding of how China viewed the event.
Honoredebalzac345 (talk) 17:45, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
- @Honoredebalzac345: As I noted at Talk:Ma Xiaotian, the quote, as you introduced it in this article, does not really provide any useful insight. There is an argument to be made that the quote is useful here, with the proper discussion of its deeper meaning relative to the rancor held by many Chinese officials over the 1999 Belgrade action, but merely reporting the quote with obersvations about its "cutting" or "jibing" nature does not provide the proper context for the information. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:30, 11 August 2020 (UTC)
Added relevant changes as per consensus reached on Talk:Ma Xiaotian. I'm a little reluctant to add any more analysis or context thats not attributable, since that would be OR or SYNTH. Honoredebalzac345 (talk) 09:39, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
@WikiDan61: Regarding your recent edit, those words are not "editorializing", they're literally used in the cited sources! I just thought they would serve to highlight the sarcastic nature of the remark. (And yes, I know "jibing" its a gerund form, but I thought it would be OK since we're quoting it ;-), and its a description of the (act of) making the remark.) Honoredebalzac345 (talk) 13:17, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
- I disagree, but I choose not to argue the point any further. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:30, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
Well let's leave it as it is then for now. Its anyway a minor issue whether those actual words from the sources are used. Honoredebalzac345 (talk) 07:55, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Page to be protected
[edit]This page is supposed to be protected as IP address Indians keep on changing the results or delete it. They don't like how Pakistani win these kind of battles, as well as for jealousy they deleted Capture of North Rajasthan(Pakistani Victory). 2407:D000:1A:3218:95AC:5B89:8A92:BA42 (talk) 07:54, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
- Wikipedia articles that use Pakistani English
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- Wikipedia In the news articles
- GA-Class aviation articles
- WikiProject Aviation articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- GA-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- GA-Class South Asian military history articles
- South Asian military history task force articles
- GA-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- GA-Class Pakistan articles
- Low-importance Pakistan articles
- WikiProject Pakistani history articles
- GA-Class Pakistani politics articles
- WikiProject Pakistani politics articles
- WikiProject Pakistan articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- GA-Class United States Government articles
- Mid-importance United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States Government articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- GA-Class International relations articles
- Mid-importance International relations articles
- WikiProject International relations articles
- GA-Class 2010s articles
- Mid-importance 2010s articles
- WikiProject 2010s articles