Talk:1988 Women's Cricket World Cup final

1988 Women's Cricket World Cup final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 2, 2020. (Reviewed version).

A fact from 1988 Women's Cricket World Cup final appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 May 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the 1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final, held at the 90,000-capacity Melbourne Cricket Ground, had an attendance of 3,326?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/May. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final.

Wikipedia

Cricket: Women's cricket Mid‑importance

This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is within the scope of the Women's cricket task force. New participants are always welcome!

WikiProject Cricket To-do list:

Article assessment

Check Category:Unassessed cricket articles for class and Category:Unknown-importance cricket articles for importance: see Assessment Department for details

Verifiability

Update fair and unfair play, fast bowling, first-class cricket, googly, innings, leg break, limited overs cricket, not out, Pakistan Cricket Board, spin bowling, underarm bowling, wicket, and other fundamental articles classified by the WikiProject as high-importance so that they meet WP:Verifiability policy standards

Cleanup

There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)

Infoboxes

Add infoboxes to the player articles found at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/requested infoboxes

Cricket people

Create articles about 19th century players who are listed in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/19th century players
Create biographies about Bangladeshi players from the task force redlink list
Check the listing of key bios at Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Key biographies and improve these to at least B-class.
Create batting/bowling graphs for cricketers who have excelled in international cricket.
Create articles for redlinks present here and here

Cricket teams & countries

Domestic cricket coverage is needed for Bangladesh, Canada, Kenya, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Zimbabwe;
Create articles from redlinks and improve existing articles in List of current first-class cricket teams; National cricket teams; Under-19 national cricket teams
Create articles about cricket in these missing countries
Create or expand articles on international tours from items in Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/summary of international tour articles
Create a link as such on Template:Cr-Aus/doc for Cricket Australia XI

Images

Add pictures (and remove template from address requests) in these Category:Wikipedia requested images of cricket people
Add pictures for grounds missing photos from here

On this day in cricket

Expand the anniversary coverage for Portal:Cricket at Portal:Cricket/Anniversaries

Umpires

Expand ICC International umpire panel; ICC Elite referee panel; ICC Associates and Affiliates umpire panel

Women

Expand Women's cricket, Women's Test cricket and articles about women's cricket generally especially biographies and tours

Update

A number of lists need to be updated, can be found in Template:International cricketers and Template:National cricket captains
Regularly updating cricketers' career stats.

Other

Export all cricket terms present in List of cricket terms to Wiktionary

Women's sport: Cricket Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Women's cricket task force.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal 1988 Women's Cricket World Cup final is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 17:09, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Melbourne Cricket Ground

... that the 1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final had an attendance of 3,326 at the 90,000 capacity Melbourne Cricket Ground (pictured)? Source: "The crowd, given as 3,326" (The Times) and "where 3000 fans rattled around the 90,000-seat stadium" (New Zealand Cricket Museum).

Reviewed: Palo Alto station

Created by Harrias (talk). Self-nominated at 09:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC).[reply]

Y Article is long enough (8334 characters), new enough (moved to mainspace on 8 April, nominated same day), and article is within policy. Copyvio is at 16% but it's a false positive, as the text flagged is just scorecard text and "won the toss and batted first", both of which are sensible to be the same as the source
Y The hook is short enough and interesting, and is supported by the combination of the two sources mentioned above
Y Image is PD, looks good at low resolution, and is used in the article
Y QPQ done
Overall, this nomination passes, congratulations. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:47, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1988 Women's Cricket World Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 13:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will be reviewing this article as part of the GAN Backlog Drive of April to May 2020. MWright96 (talk) 13:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review, will take a look through in detail tomorrow. Harrias ^talk 20:42, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Background

"England had won the first world cup" - World Cup
"Australia had beaten England" - defeated
Wikilink wickets to the relevant article

Route to the final

"once against Australia and once against New Zealand." - possible minor rewrite to avoid repetition of the same phrase?
"Ireland and the Netherlands were well adrift," - behind

Summary

"in Melbourne, Australia on 18 December." - comma after Australia please
"Heather Smith, of The Sydney Morning Herald suggested that," - the first comma isn't needed I think
Wikilink the first mention of the term "crease" to the relevant article and the same for the terms "delivery" and "over"
"earning praise from both The Sydney Morning Herald and The Times,[9][6]" - refs in numerical order

The MOS specifically states this is not necessary: "References need not be moved solely to maintain the chronological order of footnotes as they appear in the article..". Harrias ^talk 20:42, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a part of the MOS that I don't agree with but it's no deal breaker MWright96 (talk) 08:17, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"and in the fourteenth over," - 14th

Aftermath

Both mentions of "world cup" should be spelt as "World Cup"

@MWright96: Other than the point I responded to last night, all have been changed as suggested. Thanks for the review. Harrias ^talk 08:53, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Harrias: Am satisfied with the changes and will be promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 12:02, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]