Jump to content

User contributions for Indrian

A user with 15,505 edits. Account created on 20 July 2004.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

5 December 2024

4 December 2024

3 December 2024

  • 18:5018:50, 3 December 2024 diff hist 6 m Console war Background current
  • 18:4918:49, 3 December 2024 diff hist −606 Console war Nintendo's Japanese contracts were not based on exclusivity; that was something started by Nintendo of America. Few people made games for the Mark III because no one is going to bother with a system with that miniscule a market share (plus other Japanese corporate politics based on relationships rather than formal contracts.)
  • 17:4917:49, 3 December 2024 diff hist −19 Console war This is not about rewriting Wikipedia's use of generations, and you will note I left the generational concept in my revision. This article is about console wars, and those are "waged" within the core years of the lifetimes of the competing consoles, and in fact cross generations sometimes ("Genesis Does" was aimed at the NES, for example). And either way, defining our generations as possessing similar technology is inaccurate no matter how you slice it for the previously stated reasons. Tag: Manual revert
  • 16:1916:19, 3 December 2024 diff hist −19 Console war Two problems. First, a generation is not a function of the market. Now that only three companies release consoles they tend to drop in close proximity to each other, but prior to 2005, consoles came out whenever a company felt it could seize an advantage and do not fit neatly into generations, which are an imperfect historical classification. Second, this definition of generations is wrong. Saying a Wii and a PS3 or a Jaguar and a PlayStation have similar technical specifications is not accurate Tag: Reverted
  • 15:4615:46, 3 December 2024 diff hist −122 Video game Yeah… There is certainly a place on wikipedia to talk about people who get addicted to video games, but this lede is not it… Tag: Manual revert

29 November 2024

16 November 2024

13 November 2024

  • 21:5921:59, 13 November 2024 diff hist −26 Exidy The article says 1999. Even if it was just a holding company after 1996, it was not "defunct" until it ceased to exist. current

9 November 2024

  • 17:3717:37, 9 November 2024 diff hist −971 Video game crash of 1983 This is not an accurate interpretation of events. The coin-op crash was a separate event that started and ended earlier than the console market crash. The factors destroying the Atari market had no impact on this. If anything, it was the other way around, as a lack of megahits in the arcade in 1983 left little interesting to port into the home.
  • 03:4803:48, 9 November 2024 diff hist −33 Fallout (video game) We have hyperlinks so that we can avoid asides like this, and this brief definition does not really align with our definition of a game engine anyway.

8 November 2024

  • 07:4107:41, 8 November 2024 diff hist −1,534 Golden age of arcade video games The History of Computing Project no longer exists, and a peak in the Wayback Machine shows it was riddled with factual errors and not authoritative. Walter Day is not a journalist or historian and is therefore also not authoritative. current

2 November 2024

1 November 2024

29 October 2024

27 October 2024

  • 06:3806:38, 27 October 2024 diff hist −133 3DO One person, not “some,” and this person makes an exceptional and spurious claim that the price did not look bad compared to a high-end consumer PC or CD player, which was not the competition. Not a great source for this exceptional claim at all.
  • 06:2906:29, 27 October 2024 diff hist −14 3DO Needle and Mical did not design the Amiga. They were certainly on the team and made some important contributions as members of the dev team, but neither the idea nor the architecture are theirs.

26 October 2024

25 October 2024

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)