User contributions for Accurate Nuanced Clear
Appearance
Results for Accurate Nuanced Clear talk block log uploads logs global block log global account filter log
A user with 756 edits. Account created on 5 May 2005.
20 February 2024
- 15:4215:42, 20 February 2024 diff hist 14 m Talk:Killing of Hind Rajab →Uncensored audio
- 15:4115:41, 20 February 2024 diff hist 96 m Talk:Killing of Hind Rajab →Uncensored audio
- 15:4015:40, 20 February 2024 diff hist 777 Talk:Killing of Hind Rajab →Uncensored audio: new section Tag: New topic
5 June 2022
- 02:4302:43, 5 June 2022 diff hist 1 m TEOTWAWKI (Fear the Walking Dead) Wrong spelling
22 August 2021
- 22:1422:14, 22 August 2021 diff hist 148 User talk:Accurate Nuanced Clear No edit summary
- 18:4818:48, 22 August 2021 diff hist 10 Robert W. Malone →COVID-19: Methinks you protest too much. "Allegedly" is ONE WORD. Why are you so keen to delete it and claim CERTAINTY? Even criminals get 'allegedy' when WE JOURNALISTS write about them. You clearly have an AGENDA. I don't need to get 'consensus' on something that is standard good practice even in the cheapest tabloid rag. Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 18:3518:35, 22 August 2021 diff hist 10 Robert W. Malone →COVID-19: 1) The current phrasing does not make it clear enough these are ALLEGED claims of misinformation, not PROVEN 2) Editors cannot DEFINITIVELY say its misinformation unless they are a) Qualified scientists and b) Read all his statements 3) It is better to err on the side of caution. This guy is far from "fringe". If you are removing 'allegedy' and claiming certainty, WHAT IS YOUR AGENDA? I am a former journalist for the SMH and MY agenda is ACCURACY, NUANCE and CLARITY -ONLY- Tags: Manual revert Reverted
- 18:2118:21, 22 August 2021 diff hist 10 Robert W. Malone →COVID-19: This is standard good practice. Saying he was 'spreading misinformation' as though it was a FACT cannot be verified by the authors of this article unless 1) they have medical qualifications and 2) have examined what he said in detail. Otherwise make it clearer it's a claim or allegation in a different way. Wikipedia is not a propaganda mouthpiece. Tag: Reverted
9 January 2021
- 12:3812:38, 9 January 2021 diff hist 82 Criticism of Google →Other
- 12:3712:37, 9 January 2021 diff hist 82 YouTube →YouTube: ads forced on all videos, without revenue-share Tag: Reverted
- 12:3412:34, 9 January 2021 diff hist −17 YouTube →YouTube: ads forced on all videos, without revenue-share Tag: Reverted
- 12:3312:33, 9 January 2021 diff hist 587 YouTube →Controversies: Seems significant. I will start this, others can finish it Tag: Reverted
- 12:3112:31, 9 January 2021 diff hist 4 m Criticism of Google →Other
- 12:3012:30, 9 January 2021 diff hist −2 Criticism of Google →YouTube: ads forced on all videos, without revenue-share Tag: Manual revert
- 12:2912:29, 9 January 2021 diff hist 2 Criticism of Google →YouTube: ads forced on all videos, without revenue-share Tag: Reverted
- 12:2712:27, 9 January 2021 diff hist 583 Criticism of Google →Other
3 October 2020
- 05:0205:02, 3 October 2020 diff hist −100 Angel Baby (1995 film) →Premise: removing unnecessary spoilers
10 September 2020
- 05:3905:39, 10 September 2020 diff hist −1 Conscription in the United States →Vietnam War: Further regarding the previous phrasing of this section " mass of undirected youth in search of a cause": 'mass of undirected youth' is also at the very least an interpretation and also seems biased. It implies they had 'nothing better to do' and also assumes that someone SHOULD be 'directing' them as though that is somehow universally regarded as a good thing. A far more neutral expression is preferred. Also made minor improvements to imp[rove precision.
- 05:3305:33, 10 September 2020 diff hist 12 Conscription in the United States →Vietnam War: To rescind a policy means to get rid of it. How did 'rescinding'
- 05:3205:32, 10 September 2020 diff hist 12 m Conscription in the United States →Vietnam War: Why was the increase in numbers responsible for more exemptions? The connection is just unclear. Was it because there were enough people available that they could be looser about exemptions? I'm purely guessing. It probably also needs a citation to make such a connection.
- 05:2605:26, 10 September 2020 diff hist −15 m Conscription in the United States →Vietnam War: brevity
- 05:2405:24, 10 September 2020 diff hist 25 Conscription in the United States →Vietnam War: First part is unnecessary commentary (Indeed I would say biased: "in search of a cause" implies their motives had nothing to do with the substance of their protest and were insincere. The mention of the cartoonist's opinion is sufficient to explain the presence of this belief about the protesters in some parts of society. I have rewritten to make it more neutral.) Second part is very unclear and can only be clarified by someone who knows the facts
26 March 2020
- 06:4006:40, 26 March 2020 diff hist 320 User talk:Accurate Nuanced Clear →Proposed deletion of File:Den temps.jpg
19 January 2020
- 07:2007:20, 19 January 2020 diff hist 13 Occupation of the Ruhr →German politics: Making it clear that it was the Nazi party for the ordinary reader without having to click through to a link Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
5 October 2019
- 13:2613:26, 5 October 2019 diff hist 60 Talk:List of conspiracy-thriller films and television series No edit summary
15 September 2019
- 08:5208:52, 15 September 2019 diff hist 247 m Talk:The Story of Film: An Odyssey No edit summary
24 May 2018
- 09:0209:02, 24 May 2018 diff hist 1 Ex turpi causa non oritur actio →Major reconsideration of the doctrine by the Supreme Court: see talk page for an indicator of how thorough-going the court's reconsideration was
- 09:0109:01, 24 May 2018 diff hist 4 Ex turpi causa non oritur actio →Major reconsideration of the doctrine by the Supreme Court
- 08:5908:59, 24 May 2018 diff hist 127 Talk:Ex turpi causa non oritur actio →Patel v Mirza - major reconsideration
- 08:5808:58, 24 May 2018 diff hist 433 Talk:Ex turpi causa non oritur actio →Tinsley v Milligan [1992]
- 08:5608:56, 24 May 2018 diff hist 405 Ex turpi causa non oritur actio →Contract
- 08:5508:55, 24 May 2018 diff hist −349 m Ex turpi causa non oritur actio →Trusts
- 08:5308:53, 24 May 2018 diff hist 231 Ex turpi causa non oritur actio →Trusts
- 08:4608:46, 24 May 2018 diff hist 8 Ex turpi causa non oritur actio No edit summary
- 08:4608:46, 24 May 2018 diff hist 121 Ex turpi causa non oritur actio No edit summary
- 08:4408:44, 24 May 2018 diff hist 28 Ex turpi causa non oritur actio →Trusts
- 08:4208:42, 24 May 2018 diff hist 5 m Ex turpi causa non oritur actio →Trusts
26 May 2017
- 09:4509:45, 26 May 2017 diff hist 280 Talk:Martin Garrix →What does this mean? Can someone pls clarify this?: new section
3 May 2016
- 04:5504:55, 3 May 2016 diff hist 0 m Footscray, Victoria →Arts
- 04:4404:44, 3 May 2016 diff hist 0 m Footscray, Victoria →Politics
- 04:4004:40, 3 May 2016 diff hist 18 Footscray, Victoria →History
31 July 2015
- 14:2114:21, 31 July 2015 diff hist −18 Griselda Blanco →Death: Article makes no mention of a 'Ricky Nunez', nor is there any reference findable on net after a moderate search
14 July 2015
- 16:2316:23, 14 July 2015 diff hist 14 User talk:Accurate Nuanced Clear →THIS is why I stopped bothering with Wikipedia before
- 16:2316:23, 14 July 2015 diff hist 70 User talk:Accurate Nuanced Clear →THIS is why I stopped bothering with Wikipedia before
- 16:2316:23, 14 July 2015 diff hist 328 User talk:Accurate Nuanced Clear →THIS is why I stopped bothering with Wikipedia before
- 16:0816:08, 14 July 2015 diff hist 107 User talk:Accurate Nuanced Clear →Edit warring at Sydney
- 15:5415:54, 14 July 2015 diff hist 294 User talk:Accurate Nuanced Clear →THIS is why I stopped bothering with Wikipedia before
- 15:5215:52, 14 July 2015 diff hist −6 User talk:Accurate Nuanced Clear →THIS is why I stopped bothering with Wikipedia before
- 15:5215:52, 14 July 2015 diff hist 201 User talk:Accurate Nuanced Clear No edit summary
- 15:4615:46, 14 July 2015 diff hist 364 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Accurate Nuanced Clear reported by User:AussieLegend (Result: )