User contributions for 72.128.89.93

12 November 2023

• 21:0521:05, 12 November 2023 diff hist 279 Talk:Megamind →Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
• 21:0321:03, 12 November 2023 diff hist 2,405 Megamind →Television series: Thing I said below again. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 21:0221:02, 12 November 2023 diff hist 79 Megamind You are the one who is choosing to edit war. Once again You Have NOT provided a shred of evidence to claim they are content farms. Because they aren't. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 21:0021:00, 12 November 2023 diff hist 282 User talk:Alith Anar →Oh great your reverting to putting a lock on the page because you couldn't provide solid evidence that they where "content farms." How wonderful.: new section Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
• 20:5520:55, 12 November 2023 diff hist 2,405 Megamind →Television series: Thing I said below basically. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 20:5420:54, 12 November 2023 diff hist 79 Megamind You have no evidence that the sites themselves claim "content farm." Nothing says anything about it on any of those sites. Tags: Manual revert Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 20:4820:48, 12 November 2023 diff hist 2,406 Megamind →Television series: Same thing as I said before. No evidence that "content farms" can't be used. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 20:4720:47, 12 November 2023 diff hist 80 Megamind You haven't provided evidence of quote unquote "content farms" not being allowed on here. And how do you even know they are "content farms" in the first place? Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 20:4320:43, 12 November 2023 diff hist 235 Talk:Megamind →Should the popularity of the film having a resurgence on the internet through its praise on the by youtubers and memes it has had be mentioned on the article in a page along with the one on the front?: Reply Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply
• 20:4120:41, 12 November 2023 diff hist 2,406 Megamind →Television series: Not to mention elements of the first part mentioning the cult following on the front page are still mentioned. So what's stopping this from being mentioned along with the front not being expanded? Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 20:3920:39, 12 November 2023 diff hist 79 Megamind No justification for taking off the edit other then "sock puppetry." Every source follows guidelines. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit
• 19:3619:36, 12 November 2023 diff hist −8 Megamind →Cult following: Better wording. Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit