User contributions for 2A02:1810:4F0B:500:7791:C6EF:E1E4:5282

25 November 2024

• 14:5114:51, 25 November 2024 diff hist 2 Battle Angel Alita: Last Order No edit summary current
• 14:5014:50, 25 November 2024 diff hist 2 Battle Angel Alita No edit summary
• 14:4814:48, 25 November 2024 diff hist 268 Battle Angel Alita: Mars Chronicle new info about the end of mars chronicle Tag: citing a blog or free web host
• 14:4014:40, 25 November 2024 diff hist 329 Battle Angel Alita: Last Order new info about the end of mars chronicle Tag: citing a blog or free web host
• 14:3514:35, 25 November 2024 diff hist −5 Battle Angel Alita This page is about the manga, not the movies, in the manga Ido had a cat, not a daughter
• 14:3414:34, 25 November 2024 diff hist 339 Battle Angel Alita new info about the end of mars chronicle Tag: citing a blog or free web host

10 August 2024

• 01:4501:45, 10 August 2024 diff hist 74 Lelouch Lamperouge →Code Geass: Roze of the Recapture: improved readability

15 February 2023

• 19:1919:19, 15 February 2023 diff hist 6 Battle Angel Alita: Last Order reading the definition of "sequel", it was indeed the wrong word, "antecedent" is better suited
• 19:1819:18, 15 February 2023 diff hist 8 Battle Angel Alita: Mars Chronicle reading the definition of "sequel", it was indeed the wrong word, "antecedent" is better suited
• 19:0919:09, 15 February 2023 diff hist 645 Battle Angel Alita: Last Order The original series, last order and Mars Chronicle are ONE continuous story, cut in 3 series (which started due to health issues of the mangaka). Anything relating to the OG is therefore automatically also related to the "sequels" Tag: Undo
• 19:0719:07, 15 February 2023 diff hist 632 Battle Angel Alita: Mars Chronicle The original series, last order and Mars Chronicle are ONE continuous story, cut in 3 series (which started due to health issues of the mangaka). Anything relating to the OG is therefore automatically also related to the "sequels" Tag: Undo

10 February 2023

• 18:1918:19, 10 February 2023 diff hist 260 Talk:Canon (fiction) →Examples for fanon?: Reply Tag: Reply
• 18:1618:16, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16 Canon Bringing this page in line with the page, canon (fiction), it is referring to Tag: Undo
• 18:1418:14, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16 Canon (fiction) Now that the issue has been settled by a wikipedia authority, the edit war has come to an end and we can remove the unsupported claim. Tag: Undo
• 18:0918:09, 10 February 2023 diff hist 1,233 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Smitterdin reported by User:Veverve (Result: Partial block): Reply Tag: Reply
• 17:2417:24, 10 February 2023 diff hist 633 Talk:Canon (fiction) →Canon is "defined" by the fanbase: Reply Tag: Reply
• 17:1817:18, 10 February 2023 diff hist 818 Talk:Canon (fiction) →Canon is "defined" by the fanbase: Reply Tag: Reply
• 17:1417:14, 10 February 2023 diff hist 347 User talk:Smitterdin →edit warring: new section Tag: New topic
• 17:1217:12, 10 February 2023 diff hist 2,565 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring →User:Smitterdin reported by User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}} (Result: ): new section
• 16:4816:48, 10 February 2023 diff hist 575 Talk:Canon (fiction) →Canon is "defined" by the fanbase: Reply Tag: Reply
• 16:3216:32, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16 Canon (fiction) Smitterdin, stop your vandalism and edit warring, you have no sources to back up your claims, the sources, in fact, contradict your claim. You have been warned many times, any further vandalism will be reported Tags: Undo Reverted
• 16:3016:30, 10 February 2023 diff hist 380 User talk:Veverve →Regarding Smitterdin's vandalism of the canon (fiction) page: new section Tag: New topic
• 16:1916:19, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16 Canon reverting vandalism Tags: Undo Reverted
• 16:1916:19, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16 Canon (fiction) reverting vandalism Tags: Undo Reverted
• 15:0415:04, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16 Canon corrected Canon (fiction) to make it match its article Tag: Reverted
• 15:0215:02, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16 Canon (fiction) Not a single reputable source backs up the claim that canon needs to be accepted by the fan base. Some sources completely omit the "need to be accepted" and others merely stated that canon is accepted but do not state by whom. Saying that it is "the fan base" and not the franchise owners or staff of creators is purely personal conjecture and has no place on wikipedia
• 07:1807:18, 10 February 2023 diff hist 1,466 Talk:Canon (fiction) →Canon is "defined" by the fanbase: Reply Tag: Reply
• 06:4406:44, 10 February 2023 diff hist 864 Talk:Canon (fiction) →Canon is "defined" by the fanbase: Reply Tag: Reply
• 06:2706:27, 10 February 2023 diff hist 0 Talk:Canon (fiction) No edit summary
• 06:2706:27, 10 February 2023 diff hist 292 Talk:Canon (fiction) No edit summary
• 06:2406:24, 10 February 2023 diff hist 611 Talk:Canon (fiction) →Canon is "defined" by the fanbase: Reply Tag: Reply
• 06:0706:07, 10 February 2023 diff hist 775 Talk:Canon (fiction) →Canon is "defined" by the fanbase: Reply Tag: Reply
• 05:5905:59, 10 February 2023 diff hist 1,490 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase →Canon (fiction): Reply Tag: Reply
• 05:4805:48, 10 February 2023 diff hist 271 User talk:2A02:1810:4F0B:500:7791:C6EF:E1E4:5282 →Canon (fiction): Reply current Tag: Reply
• 05:2405:24, 10 February 2023 diff hist 6 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase →Canon (fiction)
• 05:2305:23, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16 Canon undoing false claims by vandal who has been attacking the "canon (fiction) page for 1.5 years Tags: Undo Reverted
• 05:2205:22, 10 February 2023 diff hist 524 Talk:Canon (fiction) →Canon is "defined" by the fanbase: Reply Tag: Reply
• 05:2005:20, 10 February 2023 diff hist 76 Canon (fiction) talk page explains in detail that your claim is unfounded and that the source you use even contradicts your claim. You have been vandalizing this page for 1.5 years. Stop it now. Tags: Undo Reverted
• 05:0105:01, 10 February 2023 diff hist −30 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase →https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_(fiction)
• 04:5904:59, 10 February 2023 diff hist 1,341 Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Increase Requesting protection for https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canon_(fiction)
• 01:5501:55, 10 February 2023 diff hist 73 Talk:Canon (fiction) fixing layout
• 01:4401:44, 10 February 2023 diff hist −16 Canon don't make false claims Tags: Undo Reverted
• 01:3101:31, 10 February 2023 diff hist 2,070 Talk:Canon (fiction) →Canon is "defined" by the fanbase
• 01:0501:05, 10 February 2023 diff hist 76 Canon (fiction) The reference you posted does not support the wild claim you make. You are deliberately misrepresenting the source. Stop making unsupported edits. Wikipedia is not your personal blog Tags: Undo Reverted

9 February 2023

• 04:2504:25, 9 February 2023 diff hist 660 Battle Angel Alita: Mars Chronicle expanding the infobox to make it more in line with the page of the original series Tag: Reverted
• 04:2304:23, 9 February 2023 diff hist 672 Battle Angel Alita: Last Order expanding the infobox to make it more in line with the page of the original series Tag: Reverted
• 04:2204:22, 9 February 2023 diff hist 18 Battle Angel Alita No edit summary
• 00:1000:10, 9 February 2023 diff hist 271 Canon (fiction) previous edit accidentally broke a reference, fixed the error Tag: Reverted

8 February 2023

• 23:3023:30, 8 February 2023 diff hist −195 Canon (fiction) Corrected error in article based on misinterpretation of its source. The source said that "some people don't accept canon as ..." but this doesn't define canon, it merely explains some people reject the concept. Just like how saying "some people don't accept the world to be an oblate sphere" doesn't count as evidence that the earth is flat. Thus the deleted part of the article has no source nor any support. Added a more appropriate source (Merriam-Webster) instead Tags: Undo Reverted
• 23:2523:25, 8 February 2023 diff hist −16 Canon No edit summary Tag: Reverted