User contributions for 180.216.76.63

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

11:3811:38, 24 September 2011 diff hist 836 Wikipedia:Reference desk/Mathematics →Derivative of Sine
11:3211:32, 24 September 2011 diff hist 541 User talk:Jowa fan →Going Up and Going Down: new section
09:2909:29, 24 September 2011 diff hist 1,252 Going up and going down Undid revision 451794924 by Jowa fan (talk) I don't think you guys understand. The proof I wrote is not due to Brunz and Herzog I don't have that book the proof I'm giving is H. Matsumura's

02:0302:03, 22 September 2011 diff hist 57 Integrally closed domain polish better than rschwieb
02:0002:00, 22 September 2011 diff hist −110 Integrally closed domain Undid revision 451775893 by Rschwieb (talk) revert incompetent english the original version was much better
01:4401:44, 22 September 2011 diff hist 2 Going up and going down you're probably so mathematically illiterate that you don't understand the proof "rscbnewtic"
01:4201:42, 22 September 2011 diff hist 1,250 Going up and going down Undid revision 451506941 by Rschwieb (talk) A proof doesn't need a reference you can check it without I will undo your edits and you will not like it leave me alone

06:4806:48, 20 September 2011 diff hist 1,250 Going up and going down Undid revision 451353921 by Rschwieb (talk) I worked hard on this and the proof is short so leave it be it's an important result you don't know how to welcome new users