These matrices are named after the physicist Wolfgang Pauli. In quantum mechanics, they occur in the Pauli equation, which takes into account the interaction of the spin of a particle with an external electromagnetic field. They also represent the interaction states of two polarization filters for horizontal/vertical polarization, 45 degree polarization (right/left), and circular polarization (right/left).
Each Pauli matrix is Hermitian, and together with the identity matrix I (sometimes considered as the zeroth Pauli matrix σ0), the Pauli matrices form a basis of the vector space of 2 × 2 Hermitian matrices over the real numbers, under addition. This means that any 2 × 2Hermitian matrix can be written in a unique way as a linear combination of Pauli matrices, with all coefficients being real numbers.
The Pauli matrices satisfy the useful product relation:
Hermitian operators represent observables in quantum mechanics, so the Pauli matrices span the space of observables of the complex two-dimensional Hilbert space. In the context of Pauli's work, σk represents the observable corresponding to spin along the kth coordinate axis in three-dimensional Euclidean space
Cayley table; the entry shows the value of the row times the column.
×
All three of the Pauli matrices can be compacted into a single expression:
where the solution to i2 = −1 is the "imaginary unit", and δjk is the Kronecker delta, which equals 1 if j = k and 0 otherwise. This expression is useful for "selecting" any one of the matrices numerically by substituting values of j = 1, 2, 3, in turn useful when any of the matrices (but no particular one) is to be used in algebraic manipulations.
from which we can deduce that each matrix σj has eigenvalues 1 and −1.
With the inclusion of the identity matrix I (sometimes denoted σ0), the Pauli matrices form an orthogonal basis (in the sense of Hilbert–Schmidt) of the Hilbert space of 2 × 2 Hermitian matrices over , and the Hilbert space of all complex2 × 2 matrices over .
The Pauli vector is defined by[b]
where , , and are an equivalent notation for the more familiar , , and .
The Pauli vector provides a mapping mechanism from a vector basis to a Pauli matrix basis[2] as follows:
More formally, this defines a map from to the vector space of traceless Hermitian matrices. This map encodes structures of as a normed vector space and as a Lie algebra (with the cross-product as its Lie bracket) via functions of matrices, making the map an isomorphism of Lie algebras. This makes the Pauli matrices intertwiners from the point of view of representation theory.
Another way to view the Pauli vector is as a Hermitian traceless matrix-valued dual vector, that is, an element of that maps
Each component of can be recovered from the matrix (see completeness relation below)
This constitutes an inverse to the map , making it manifest that the map is a bijection.
The norm is given by the determinant (up to a minus sign)
Then, considering the conjugation action of an matrix on this space of matrices,
we find and that is Hermitian and traceless. It then makes sense to define where has the same norm as and therefore interpret as a rotation of three-dimensional space. In fact, it turns out that the special restriction on implies that the rotation is orientation preserving. This allows the definition of a map given by
where This map is the concrete realization of the double cover of by and therefore shows that The components of can be recovered using the tracing process above:
The cross-product is given by the matrix commutator (up to a factor of )
In fact, the existence of a norm follows from the fact that is a Lie algebra (see Killing form).
This cross-product can be used to prove the orientation-preserving property of the map above.
The eigenvalues of are This follows immediately from tracelessness and explicitly computing the determinant.
More abstractly, without computing the determinant, which requires explicit properties of the Pauli matrices, this follows from since this can be factorised into A standard result in linear algebra (a linear map that satisfies a polynomial equation written in distinct linear factors is diagonal) means this implies is diagonal with possible eigenvalues The tracelessness of means it has exactly one of each eigenvalue.
Its normalized eigenvectors are
These expressions become singular for . They can be rescued by letting and taking the limit , which yields the correct eigenvectors (0,1) and (1,0) of .
Alternatively, one may use spherical coordinates to obtain the eigenvectors and .
The Pauli 4-vector, used in spinor theory, is written with components
This defines a map from to the vector space of Hermitian matrices,
which also encodes the Minkowski metric (with mostly minus convention) in its determinant:
This 4-vector also has a completeness relation. It is convenient to define a second Pauli 4-vector
and allow raising and lowering using the Minkowski metric tensor. The relation can then be written
Similarly to the Pauli 3-vector case, we can find a matrix group that acts as isometries on in this case the matrix group is and this shows Similarly to above, this can be explicitly realized for with components
In fact, the determinant property follows abstractly from trace properties of the For matrices, the following identity holds:
That is, the 'cross-terms' can be written as traces. When are chosen to be different the cross-terms vanish. It then follows, now showing summation explicitly,
Since the matrices are this is equal to
Pauli vectors elegantly map these commutation and anticommutation relations to corresponding vector products. Adding the commutator to the anticommutator gives
so that,
Contracting each side of the equation with components of two 3-vectors ap and bq (which commute with the Pauli matrices, i.e., apσq = σqap) for each matrix σq and vector component ap (and likewise with bq) yields
If i is identified with the pseudoscalar σxσyσz then the right hand side becomes , which is also the definition for the product of two vectors in geometric algebra.
If we define the spin operator as J = ħ/2σ, then J satisfies the commutation relation:Or equivalently, the Pauli vector satisfies:
The following traces can be derived using the commutation and anticommutation relations.
If the matrix σ0 = I is also considered, these relationships become
where Greek indices α, β, γ and μ assume values from {0, x, y, z} and the notation is used to denote the sum over the cyclic permutation of the included indices.
while the determinant of the exponential itself is just 1, which makes it the generic group element of SU(2).
A more abstract version of formula (2) for a general 2 × 2 matrix can be found in the article on matrix exponentials. A general version of (2) for an analytic (at a and −a) function is provided by application of Sylvester's formula,[3]
It is also straightforward to likewise work out the adjoint action on the Pauli vector, namely rotation of any angle along any axis :
Taking the dot product of any unit vector with the above formula generates the expression of any single qubit operator under any rotation. For example, it can be shown that .
An alternative notation that is commonly used for the Pauli matrices is to write the vector index k in the superscript, and the matrix indices as subscripts, so that the element in row α and column β of the k-th Pauli matrix is σ kαβ.
In this notation, the completeness relation for the Pauli matrices can be written
Proof
The fact that the Pauli matrices, along with the identity matrix I, form an orthogonal basis for the Hilbert space of all 2 × 2 complex Hermitian matrices means that we can express any Hermitian matrix M as
where c is a complex number, and a is a 3-component, complex vector. It is straightforward to show, using the properties listed above, that
where "tr" denotes the trace, and hence that
which can be rewritten in terms of matrix indices as
where summation over the repeated indices is impliedγ and δ. Since this is true for any choice of the matrix M, the completeness relation follows as stated above. Q.E.D.
As noted above, it is common to denote the 2 × 2 unit matrix by σ0, so σ0αβ = δαβ. The completeness relation can alternatively be expressed as
The fact that any Hermitian complex 2 × 2 matrices can be expressed in terms of the identity matrix and the Pauli matrices also leads to the Bloch sphere representation of 2 × 2 mixed states’ density matrix, (positive semidefinite 2 × 2 matrices with unit trace. This can be seen by first expressing an arbitrary Hermitian matrix as a real linear combination of {σ0, σ1, σ2, σ3} as above, and then imposing the positive-semidefinite and trace1 conditions.
For a pure state, in polar coordinates, the idempotent density matrix
acts on the state eigenvector with eigenvalue 1, hence it acts like a projection operator.
Its eigenvalues are therefore[d] 1 or −1. It may thus be utilized as an interaction term in a Hamiltonian, splitting the energy eigenvalues of its symmetric versus antisymmetric eigenstates.
The group SU(2) is the Lie group of unitary2 × 2 matrices with unit determinant; its Lie algebra is the set of all 2 × 2 anti-Hermitian matrices with trace 0. Direct calculation, as above, shows that the Lie algebra is the three-dimensional real algebra spanned by the set {iσk}. In compact notation,
As a result, each iσj can be seen as an infinitesimal generator of SU(2). The elements of SU(2) are exponentials of linear combinations of these three generators, and multiply as indicated above in discussing the Pauli vector. Although this suffices to generate SU(2), it is not a proper representation of su(2), as the Pauli eigenvalues are scaled unconventionally. The conventional normalization is λ = 1/2, so that
The Lie algebra is isomorphic to the Lie algebra , which corresponds to the Lie group SO(3), the group of rotations in three-dimensional space. In other words, one can say that the iσj are a realization (and, in fact, the lowest-dimensional realization) of infinitesimal rotations in three-dimensional space. However, even though and are isomorphic as Lie algebras, SU(2) and SO(3) are not isomorphic as Lie groups. SU(2) is actually a double cover of SO(3), meaning that there is a two-to-one group homomorphism from SU(2) to SO(3), see relationship between SO(3) and SU(2).
The real linear span of {I, iσ1, iσ2, iσ3} is isomorphic to the real algebra of quaternions, , represented by the span of the basis vectors The isomorphism from to this set is given by the following map (notice the reversed signs for the Pauli matrices):
Alternatively, the isomorphism can be achieved by a map using the Pauli matrices in reversed order,[5]
As the set of versorsU ⊂ forms a group isomorphic to SU(2), U gives yet another way of describing SU(2). The two-to-one homomorphism from SU(2) to SO(3) may be given in terms of the Pauli matrices in this formulation.
In classical mechanics, Pauli matrices are useful in the context of the Cayley-Klein parameters.[6] The matrix P corresponding to the position of a point in space is defined in terms of the above Pauli vector matrix,
Consequently, the transformation matrix Qθ for rotations about the x-axis through an angle θ may be written in terms of Pauli matrices and the unit matrix as[6]
Similar expressions follow for general Pauli vector rotations as detailed above.
An interesting property of spin 1⁄2 particles is that they must be rotated by an angle of 4π in order to return to their original configuration. This is due to the two-to-one correspondence between SU(2) and SO(3) mentioned above, and the fact that, although one visualizes spin up/down as the north–south pole on the 2-sphereS2, they are actually represented by orthogonal vectors in the two-dimensional complex Hilbert space.
For a spin 1⁄2 particle, the spin operator is given by J = ħ/2σ, the fundamental representation of SU(2). By taking Kronecker products of this representation with itself repeatedly, one may construct all higher irreducible representations. That is, the resulting spin operators for higher spin systems in three spatial dimensions, for arbitrarily large j, can be calculated using this spin operator and ladder operators. They can be found in Rotation group SO(3) § A note on Lie algebras. The analog formula to the above generalization of Euler's formula for Pauli matrices, the group element in terms of spin matrices, is tractable, but less simple.[7]
Also useful in the quantum mechanics of multiparticle systems, the general Pauli groupGn is defined to consist of all n-fold tensor products of Pauli matrices.
In relativistic quantum mechanics, the spinors in four dimensions are 4 × 1 (or 1 × 4) matrices. Hence the Pauli matrices or the Sigma matrices operating on these spinors have to be 4 × 4 matrices. They are defined in terms of 2 × 2 Pauli matrices as
It follows from this definition that the matrices have the same algebraic properties as the σk matrices.
However, relativistic angular momentum is not a three-vector, but a second order four-tensor. Hence needs to be replaced by Σμν, the generator of Lorentz transformations on spinors. By the antisymmetry of angular momentum, the Σμν are also antisymmetric. Hence there are only six independent matrices.
The first three are the The remaining three, where the Dirac αk matrices are defined as
The relativistic spin matrices Σμν are written in compact form in terms of commutator of gamma matrices as
In quantum information, single-qubitquantum gates are 2 × 2 unitary matrices. The Pauli matrices are some of the most important single-qubit operations. In that context, the Cartan decomposition given above is called the "Z–Y decomposition of a single-qubit gate". Choosing a different Cartan pair gives a similar "X–Y decomposition of a single-qubit gate.
^
This conforms to the convention in mathematics for the matrix exponential, iσ ⟼ exp(iσ). In the convention in physics, σ ⟼ exp(−iσ), hence in it no pre-multiplication by i is necessary to land in SU(2).
^
The Pauli vector is a formal device. It may be thought of as an element of , where the tensor product space is endowed with a mapping induced by the dot product on
^The relation among a, b, c, n, m, k derived here in the 2 × 2 representation holds for all representations of SU(2), being a group identity. Note that, by virtue of the standard normalization of that group's generators as half the Pauli matrices, the parameters a,b,c correspond to half the rotation angles of the rotation group. That is, the Gibbs formula linked amounts to .
^
Explicitly, in the convention of "right-space matrices into elements of left-space matrices", it is