Kingdom of Champasak
This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Kingdom of Champasak ອານາຈັກຈຳປາສັກ (Lao) Anachak Champasak | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1713–1904 | |||||||||
Flag | |||||||||
Status | Independent (1713-1778) Vassal of Siam (1778–1904) | ||||||||
Capital | Champasak | ||||||||
Common languages | Lao | ||||||||
Religion | Theravada Buddhism | ||||||||
Government | Absolute monarchy | ||||||||
King | |||||||||
• 1713–1737 | Nokasad (first) | ||||||||
• 1900–1904 | Ratsadanay (last) | ||||||||
History | |||||||||
• Dissolution of Lan Xang | 1713 | ||||||||
• Vassal of Siam | 1778 | ||||||||
• Annexed to French Laos | 1904 | ||||||||
Currency | Lat, Hoi, Phot Duang | ||||||||
| |||||||||
Today part of | Laos Thailand Cambodia Vietnam |
History of Laos | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Muang city-states era | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Lan Xang era | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Regional kingdoms era | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Colonial era | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
Independent era | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
See also | ||||||||||||||
The Kingdom of Champasak (Lao: ຈຳປາສັກ [tɕàmpàːsák]) or Bassac, (1713–1904) was a Lao kingdom under Nokasad, a grandson of King Sourigna Vongsa, the last king of Lan Xang and son-in-law of the Cambodian King Chey Chettha IV.[citation needed] Bassac and the neighboring principalities of Attapeu and Stung Treng emerged as power centers under what was later to be described as the Mandala Southeast Asian political model.[1]
The kingdom was sited on the eastern or Left Bank of the Mekong, south of the Right Bank principality of Khong Chiam where the Mun River joins; and east of where the Mekong makes a sharp bend to the west to return abruptly and flow southeasterly down to what is now Cambodia.[citation needed]
History
[edit]The Kingdom of Champassak was founded in 1713 when the southern part of the Lan Xang seceded.[2][why?] The remainder of Lan Xang in the north had already split into the Kingdom of Luang Prabang and the Kingdom of Vientiane, in response to the throne being taken over by a nephew of Souligna Vonsa after his death the help of Vietnamese army.[2]
Due to scarcity of information from the periods known as the Post-Angkor Period, the Khorat Plateau seems to have been largely depopulated, and Left Bank principalities began to repopulate the Right. In 1718, a Lao emigration in the company of an official in the service of King Nokasad founded Muang Suwannaphum as the first recorded population of Lao in the Chi River valley—indeed anywhere in the interior of the plateau.[3]
Around 1766, Vorarad-Vongsa, a dignitary in the Kingdom of Vientiane, started a rebellion. His plan failed, but he submitted to the King of Champasak, which led to the conflict between Champasak and Vientiane.[citation needed]
Champassak was invaded by and made a dependency of Siam in 1778, joining Luang Prabang and Vientiane.[2] The kings of Champassak were allowed to rule their kingdoms but had to pay tribute.[2] The kings were chosen by Siam.[2][clarification needed]
In 1777, King Taksin of Siam sent an invading army to the Kingdom of Vientiane. The Thai army also attacked Champasak, and the kingdom was occupied without major resistance. King Pothi (Sayakumane) was taken prisoner to Krung Thep (Bangkok). In 1780, King Sayakumane was allowed to return to Champasak as vassal of the Siamese king.[citation needed]
At the beginning of the 19th century, and ignoring the worldwide agricultural disaster accompanying the 1816 Year Without a Summer, Bassac was said to be on a prosperous trade route as the outlet for cardamon, rubber, wax, resin, skins, horns, and slaves from the east bank to Ubon, Khorat, and Bangkok.[1]: image 4 The region then fell victim to Siamese and French struggles to extend suzerainty.
After the Laotian Rebellion of 1826–1829, Suwannaphum lost its status and Champasak was reduced to vassalage. The Siamese-Cambodian War of 1831–1834 reduced the entire region to vassalage of the Nguyen dynasty, a situation soon further complicated by the French striving in the same region to establish what was to become French Indochina.[citation needed]
Following the Franco-Siamese crisis of 1893, the Left Bank fell under French rule as an administrative block, with its royalty stripped of many privileges; French colonial administration of Lao kingdoms impoverished the region. The 1893 treaty called for a 25-kilometre (16 mi) wide demilitarized zone along the Right Bank, which made Siamese control impossible. It soon became a haven for lawless characters from both banks of the river. Lack of clear chains of authority resulted in turmoil in the whole region, and in what was known to the Siamese side as the "Holy Man's Rebellion".[1]
Ong Keo and Ong Kommandam of the Bolaven Plateau Alak people, led the initial resistance against French control, which evolved into the Holy Man's Rebellion. The concomitant right-bank Holy Man's Rebellion of 1901–1902 was a short-lived phenomenon.[1]: image 22 Following legal action against captured local leaders of the movement, the Thai government considered the case of the rebellion closed.[1]: image 15 The right-bank dependencies were absorbed into the Siamese Northeast Monthon, Isan (มณฑลอีสาน), and the House of Na Champassak continued to rule autonomously. In 1904, prior to the Franco-Siamese Treaty, the kingdom's capital was transferred to French rule and was placed under the control of French Cambodia. Despite historical claims by Cambodia, Champassak lost jurisdiction over the province of Stung Treng and in return regained the city of Champasak. In addition, the provinces of Kontum and Pleiku were ceded to French administration in Annam.[citation needed]
In 1946, when Chao Nhouy or Chao Ratsadanay died, his son Chao Boun Oum Na Champassak became the head of the House of Champassak. He was also appointed as Inspector General for Life in Laos, in lieu of him agreeing not to make a claim on the Lao throne. Boun Oum was forced to leave Laos and become a political refugee in France in 1975. He died in France on March 17, 1980. He had nine children.[citation needed]
Kings of Champassak (1713–1904)
[edit]- Nokasad (Soysisamout Phoutthangkoun) (1713–1737, grandson of Sourigna Vongsa)
- Sayakumane (1737–1791, son of Nokasat)
- Fay Na (1791–1811, son of Phra Vorarat, not of royal descent appointed by Siam)
- No Muong (1811–1813, son of Fay Na, not of royal descent)
- Manoi (1813–1819, nephew of Sayakoummane)
- Nho (Chao Yo house of Vientiane) (1819–1827, son of King Anouvong, Kingdom of Vientiane)
- 1829–1893 Siam annexes Champassak following the Chao Anouvong Rebellion and confirms subsequent kings
- Huy (1828–1840, great-grandson of Nokasat)
- Nark (1841–1851, brother of Huy)
- Boua (1851–1853 regent, 1853 king, son of Huy)
- Interregnum (1853–1856)
- Kham Nai (1856–1858, son of Huy)
- Interregnum (Chao Chou) (1858–1863)
- Kham Souk (1863–1899) son of Huy, French divide kingdom in 1893.
- Ratsadanay (Nhouy) (1900–1904) son of Khamsouk, his Kingdom was dissolved but he retained his royal title during French colonization; 1905–1934 given title as regional governor.
- Chao Boun Oum (1912-1980), son of Chao Ratsadanay, hereditary prince of Champassak.
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e Murdoch, John B. (1974). "The 1901-1902 Holy Man's Rebellion" (PDF). Journal of the Siam Society. JSS Vol.62.1 (digital image). Siam Heritage Trust: 2–9. Archived from the original (free) on July 13, 2018. Retrieved April 2, 2013.
Furthest afield were Vientiane and Bassac....
- ^ a b c d e "Laos". Britannica. 2024-11-29. Retrieved 2024-11-29.
- ^ Brow, James (2005), "Population, land and structural change in Sri Lanka and Thailand", Contributions to Asian Studies (9), Kogan Page, Limited: 47, ISBN 90-04-04529-5