Island chain strategy
The island chain strategy is a strategic maritime containment plan first conceived by American foreign policy statesman John Foster Dulles in 1951, during the Korean War.[1] It proposed surrounding the Soviet Union and China with naval bases in the West Pacific to project power and restrict sea access.[2]
The "island chain" concept did not become a major theme in American foreign policy during the Cold War, but after the dissolution of the Soviet Union has remained a major focus of both American and Chinese geopolitical and military analysts to this day. For the United States, the island chain strategy is a significant part of the force projection of the U.S. military in the Far East. For China, the concept is integral to its maritime security and fears of strategic encirclement by U.S. armed forces. For both sides, the island chain strategy emphasizes the geographical and strategic importance of Taiwan.[3]
First island chain
[edit].jpg)
The first island chain refers to the first chain of major Pacific archipelagos out from the East Asian continental mainland coast. It is principally composed of the Kuril Islands, the Japanese archipelago, the Ryukyu Islands, Taiwan (Formosa), the northern Philippines, and Borneo, hence extending all the way from the Kamchatka Peninsula in the northeast to the Malay Peninsula in the southwest. The first island chain forms one of three island chain doctrines within the island chain strategy in the U.S. foreign policy.[4][5]
Second island chain
[edit]The second island chain, also called the "second island cloud" by Earl Hancock Ellis,[7] has two different interpretations, but the version most commonly used refers to the island chain which is formed by Japan's Bonin Islands and Volcano Islands, in addition to the Mariana Islands (most notably Guam, an unincorporated American overseas territory with a heavily fortified military base), western Caroline Islands (Yap and Palau), and extends to Western New Guinea.[1] The chain serves as the eastern maritime boundary of the Philippine Sea.[citation needed]
As it is located within the middle portion of the West Pacific, it acts as a second strategic defense line for the United States.[1]
Third island chain
[edit]The third island chain is the final part of the strategy. This island chain begins at the Aleutian Islands and runs south across the center of the Pacific Ocean towards Oceania, through the Hawaiian Islands, American Samoa and Fiji, to reach New Zealand.[1] Australia serves as the staple between the second and third chains.[citation needed]
Proposed fourth and fifth island chains
[edit]The Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative (AMTI), a group under the Center for Strategic and International Studies, argues that a fourth and a fifth island chain should be added to an overall understanding of Chinese maritime strategy in the Indo-Pacific. Whereas the first three island chains are located in the Pacific Ocean, these two newly proposed ones are in the Indian Ocean, which would reflect the growing Chinese interest in the region.[1]
The proposed fourth chain would include places like Lakshadweep, the Maldives and Diego Garcia to disrupt the String of Pearls waypoints towards the Persian Gulf such as the Gwadar Port and Hambantota; while the proposed fifth chain would originate from Camp Lemonnier in the Gulf of Aden, around the Horn of Africa and along the entire East African coastline through the Mozambique Channel (between Mozambique and Madagascar, including the Comoro Islands) towards South Africa, to encircle the Chinese naval base at Doraleh, Djibouti and sabotage China's trade with Africa.[1]
Target and events
[edit]The primary target of the doctrine was originally the biggest communism country, Soviet Union. However, additional targets also included the other communism country like People's Republic of China, Vietnam, Russia and North Korea. After the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991 and China's economic prominence in the early 21st century, China became the major target of the doctrine.[citation needed]
See also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f "CHINA'S REACH HAS GROWN; SO SHOULD THE ISLAND CHAINS". Center for Strategic and International Studies. 22 October 2018. Archived from the original on 17 November 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
- ^ Umetsu, Hiroyuki (1 June 1996). "Communist China's entry into the Korean hostilities and a U.S. proposal for a collective security arrangement in the Pacific offshore island chain". Journal of Northeast Asian Studies. 15 (2): 98–118. doi:10.1007/BF03028144. ISSN 1874-6284. S2CID 150794431. Archived from the original on 29 June 2019. Retrieved 19 June 2020.
- ^ Yoshihara, Toshi (July 2012). "China's Vision of Its Seascape: The First Island Chain and Chinese Seapower". Asian Politics & Policy. 4 (3): 293–314. doi:10.1111/j.1943-0787.2012.01349.x.
- ^ Vorndick, Wilson (22 October 2018). "CHINA'S REACH HAS GROWN; SO SHOULD THE ISLAND CHAINS". Asia Maritime Transparency Initiative. Center for Strategic and International Studies. Archived from the original on 17 November 2020. Retrieved 12 November 2020.
- ^ "How the Pentagon thinks about America's strategy in the Pacific". The Economist. 15 June 2023. ISSN 0013-0613. Archived from the original on 15 June 2023. Retrieved 16 June 2023.
- ^ Holmes, James R.; Yoshihara, Toshi (10 September 2012). Chinese Naval Strategy in the 21st Century: The Turn to Mahan. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-135-98176-1. OCLC 811506562.
- ^ Erickson, Andrew S. (1 August 2024). "Geography Matters, Time Collides: Mapping China's Maritime Strategic Space under Xi - Mapping China's Strategic Space". National Bureau of Asian Research. Archived from the original on 5 August 2024. Retrieved 5 August 2024.