Yates's correction for continuity

In statistics, Yates's correction for continuity (or Yates's chi-squared test) is used in certain situations when testing for independence in a contingency table. It aims at correcting the error introduced by assuming that the discrete probabilities of frequencies in the table can be approximated by a continuous distribution (chi-squared). Unlike the standard Pearson chi-squared statistic, it is approximately unbiased.

Correction for approximation error

edit

Using the chi-squared distribution to interpret Pearson's chi-squared statistic requires one to assume that the discrete probability of observed binomial frequencies in the table can be approximated by the continuous chi-squared distribution. This assumption is not quite correct, and introduces some error.

To reduce the error in approximation, Frank Yates, an English statistician, suggested a correction for continuity that adjusts the formula for Pearson's chi-squared test by subtracting 0.5 from the difference between each observed value and its expected value in a 2 × 2 contingency table.[1] This reduces the chi-squared value obtained and thus increases its p-value.

The effect of Yates's correction is to prevent overestimation of statistical significance for small data. This formula is chiefly used when at least one cell of the table has an expected count smaller than 5.

 

The following is Yates's corrected version of Pearson's chi-squared statistics:

 

where:

Oi = an observed frequency
Ei = an expected (theoretical) frequency, asserted by the null hypothesis
N = number of distinct events

2 × 2 table

edit

As a short-cut, for a 2 × 2 table with the following entries:

  S F  
A a b a b
B c d c d
  a c b d N
 

In some cases, this is better.

 

Yates's correction should always be applied, as it will tend to improve the accuracy of the p-value obtained.[citation needed] However, in situations with large sample sizes, using the correction will have little effect on the value of the test statistic, and hence the p-value.

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Yates, F (1934). "Contingency table involving small numbers and the χ2 test". Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 1(2): 217–235. JSTOR 2983604