Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Datameer

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Croakingtoad

Greetings! I respectfully submit this page should not be deleted. While I respect and agree with many of the conclusions of the editor (SwisterTwister), I firmly believe this company is notable pursuant to Wikipedia's guidelines on notability which I will address below. I do agree the article needs cleanup and has obviously set stale for some time, but probably is more deserving of Conflict of Interest and Citation needed tags. I am happy to volunteer to get it cleaned up and in proper compliance/order before the end of February 2017, and submit it via the talk page (or this page) for editorial review, and publication.

Here are a few of the reasons I believe the company to be notable:

  • Datameer and its subject matter expertise is cited in no less than 6 extant patents at the USPTO [1]
  • Datameer has its own patent "Apparatus and Method for Scheduling Distributed Workflow Tasks" pending approval before the USPTO [2]

I did a quick search in Google News and found these relevant articles (note I didn't mention all articles as some were clearly generated via press releases, etc.) to also contribute to notability:

Hopefully this is sufficient enough to show this company warrants cleanup rather than deletion. As I stated before, I'm happy to help nurture this page into compliance and submit my updates via talk page to an editor for approval and publication.

Marty Martin (talk) 20:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply