Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Freepsbane

< Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser | Case
If you are creating a new request about this user, please add it to the top of the page, above this notice. Don't forget to add
{{Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Freepsbane}}
to the checkuser page here. Previous requests (shown below), and this box, will be automatically hidden on Requests for checkuser (but will still appear here).
The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.

Freepsbane

edit
request links: main • edit • links • history • watch
Filed: 05:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

[2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] Relevant IP edits [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] Freepsbane is a user found to be a troll. Freepsbane has embarked on a vendetta agianst me since the consensus was against him during a previous edit war he started over another article back in December. He has persisted in edit warring on aeronautic articles in a aggressive manner. A check of the history of the page shows that Freepsbane and a few IP addresses (suspected to be his) have been almost continually involved in editwaring [29]and [30]; a quick check of the accounts/addresses in question and their contributions shows that they have only edited over the topic of contention with a identical style. Downtrip (talk) 05:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

this page is a simple copy edit of Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Downtrip lacking a puppet. and not providing examples of violations of 3RR or meatpupperty along with the use of multiple letters, clearly a texbook case of a noncompliant request, used in an atempt at fishing.Freepsbane (talk) 18:22, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

 Additional information needed After a quick look, I was not able to find the 3RR violations you are alleging. Please reformat the report with diffs showing the violation. I don't see how this content dispute qualifies as a serious pattern of vandalism either. Feel free to list this case once these two issues are addressed. -- lucasbfr talk, checkuser clerk, 09:59, 18 February 2008 (UTC).[reply]

no Declined - insufficient evidence of abuse here to take a case, sorry - Alison ❤ 22:34, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the Request for checkuser. Please do not modify it.
Subsequent requests related to this user should be made above, in a new section.


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Freepsbane&oldid=1144624631"