Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 29

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

September 29

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 29, 2024.

Mitra Sen Ahir

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restore and send to AfD as a disputed BLAR. (non-admin closure) C F A 💬 01:37, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This article was cut down to a redirect on the basis that all of the cited sources were unreliable--I agree with this assessment, and was not able to find additional sources in a WP:BEFORE search, nor is there mention at the current target. Seeing as the only connection to the target is on the basis of claims made in unreliable sources and/or invented by an editor, deletion seems more appropriate than maintaining this redirect. signed, Rosguill talk 23:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Flugzeugkollision zwischen Airbus A350-900 XWB (Japan-Airlines-Flug 516) und De Havilland Canada Dash 8-Q300 (japanische Küstenwache) seit 2. Januar 2024 in Flughafen Tokio-Haneda

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:58, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be an incorrect title translation that needs to be verified by a Dutchman/woman. Why is it so long? Delete. -1ctinus📝🗨 23:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete, not because it's incorrect (it isn't*) or too long (length isn't a reason to delete on it's own) but because there is no affinity between a crash involving two Japanese aircraft at a Japanese airport and Dutch (WP:RFOREIGN). *Google translates this as "Aircraft collision between Airbus A350-900 XWB (Japan Airlines Flight 516) and De Havilland Canada Dash 8-Q300 (Japan Coast Guard) since January 2, 2024 at Tokyo Haneda Airport"; While English would use "on" rather than "since", I believe this is correct in idiomatic Dutch. Thryduulf (talk) 00:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It indeed means "since", though not in idiomatic Dutch (did Google Translate not tell you which language it was translating from?) but in German. It's not really a correct way to refer to this. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:12, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete, this is German, not Dutch, but the argument still holds: there's no affinity between the language and the subject.—Ketil Trout (<><!) 02:52, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per above --Lenticel (talk) 03:01, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Rule 34 (Internet meme) (version 2)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Move without redirect. No need to leave this hanging. Procedural close as well. – robertsky (talk) 07:30, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This redirect was left hanging around from a round-robin move attempt, we're told at WP:RMTR. Just needs to be deleted, not moved. Dicklyon (talk) 22:56, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Force aérienne royale néerlandaise/Koninklijke Luchtmacht (fait partie de Force armées néerlandaises (11 mars 1953 - il y a 71 ans) in Pays-Bas/onderdeel van Nederlandse krijgsmacht (11 maart 1953 - 71 jaar geleden) in Nederland)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:59, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Seems to be an incorrect translation that needs to be verified by a Dutchman/woman. Why is it so long? Delete. -1ctinus📝🗨 22:10, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wpedia

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 7#Wpedia

Digital Manga Guild

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 23:59, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned Isla🏳️‍⚧ 21:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mentioned now. Xfansd (talk) 23:56, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so its fine to keep now thank you very much for adding it to the article Isla🏳️‍⚧ 00:21, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sundararaja Perumal Temple, Salem

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:13, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No references in Alagirinathar Temple call it as Sundararaja Perumal Temple, Salem. It is WP:OR. Redtigerxyz Talk 15:55, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Procedural relist for closing an old log.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 20:19, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Pseudointellectual

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:59, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Target article appears to say little to nothing about pseudo-intellectuals as opposed to legitimate intellectuals. The only time the prefix "pseudo" is used is in the Criticism section where Noam Chomsky criticizes social scientists and technocrats. – MrPersonHumanGuy (talk) 20:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of swears

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 8#List of swears

Subvarieties

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Subvariety and disambiguate at target. Existing target article is moved to Subvariety (botany). (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:11, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure why this does not redirect to Subvariety. 1234qwer1234qwer4 16:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you look at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Subvarieties, you see one link to a philosophy page (which shouldn't be there), and a number of links that require the mathematical meaning. Nothing for the botanical meaning. Charles Matthews (talk) 16:40, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The game (the game)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. wbm1058 (talk) 23:50, 11 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary duplication (unnecessary duplication). Implausible. Alongside this, congrats on losing the game! mwwv converse∫edits 20:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:RDAB does not apply here; there are technically no errors in the format and potential capitalization (and spelling) errors are irrelevant because it is not a variation of 'disambiguation'. For example, a redirect such as Band (band) would be appropriate for a band named 'Band'. Thus, we cannot write these off wholesale. — Godsy (TALKCONT) 05:11, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep - the rationale for this redirect is that it is referring to the ambiguous phrase the game in the context of something that is specifically known as "the game". This seems at least somewhat plausible, and I don't see anything that would be gained by deletion - no evidence has been put forward that this redirect is causing actual harm. Hog Farm Talk 14:23, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Regards, SONIC678 15:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Big Bear (malt liquor)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:15, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

R with history. BLAR'd in 2020. No mention of "Big Bear" at the target article. Utopes (talk / cont) 23:26, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is Hamm's Brewery#Hamm's Bear as a differential potential target. AFAICT the phrase "Big Bear" originated from Hamm's and was used e.g. as Big Bear Happenings corporate newsletter, December 1972.. But judging from the fact that malt liquor was a 1980's thing and Pabst purchased Hamm's in 1983, the malt liquor originated from Pabst. Not particularly notable. I'd say finish what was started and delete. Mathnerd314159 (talk) 01:35, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: For an opinion on the page history. Also bundled the uppercase title with this.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 13:39, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Smooth variety

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus — no quorum. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:20, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These should be consistent. 1234qwer1234qwer4 02:29, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • I think both should redirect to "smooth scheme" since that article discusses the topic in more depth with more examples. —- Taku (talk) 04:16, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep both for the moment. Not all readers interested in algebraic geometry are specialists of scheme theory. So, per WP:ASTONISH, the subject must be linked to an article where it is explained in classical terms, and, nevertheless, readers interested in schemes must find an article convenient for them. I wrote "for the moment" because the subject is very poorly described in Wikipedia, and the redirect problem can be correctly resolved only if the articles would be well rewritten.
    An example of the poor content of both articles is the fact that none of the articles is clearly linked to Regular ring and none states the fundmental fact that an affine algebraic variety is smooth if and only if its ring of regular functions is regular, or, more generally, that the spectrum of a Noetherian ring is smooth if and only if the ring is regular. D.Lazard (talk) 08:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I agree the topic is poorly covered. Since "smooth variety" is essentially a shortening of "smooth algebraic variety", I suggest that both should probably point at Singular point of an algebraic variety. I've added a sentence to the lead of that article that refers the reader to the more general concept. 1234qwer1234qwer4 15:40, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 01:00, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 13:20, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Liu Yi (badminton)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was move target article back to Liu Yi (badminton). If the article on the Singaporean player is created the article can be doubly disambiguated again if necessary. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:23, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link. This title linking to 2 badminton players. 1. Liu Yi Singaporean badminton player. 2. Liu Yi Chinese badminton player. Since this link has long been used to refer to Singaporean badminton player. So, this link should be delete for Liu Yi Chinese badminton player. I have move the Chinese player to Liu Yi (badminton, born 2003). Stvbastian (talk) 11:56, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

BJP KARNATAKA

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 11:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Hemant Dabral, can you please give a reason why you want to delete these redirects? mwwv converse∫edits 14:00, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Unnecessary redirects like capital letters, BJP "for", "of" in" these aren't commonly possible search terms. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 17:18, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

BJP of Maharashtra

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 14:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 11:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

BJP for Bengal

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 14:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 11:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

BJP in West Bengal

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. ✗plicit 14:14, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 11:03, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Bharathiya Janata Party, Kerala

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Bharathiya Janata Party. No rationale was provided by the nominator for deletion. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:38, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. — Hemant Dabral (📞 • ✒) 17:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why? 73.163.220.231 (talk) 02:27, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

FZDO

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 7#FZDO

The Dharmas

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Jay 💬 08:36, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing explains why this rediredts here. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:43, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Grabage truck

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 6#Grabage truck

Burglar (disabmiguation)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 06:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible misspelling. Killarnee (talk) 06:14, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – straightforward WP:RDAB. jlwoodwa (talk) 19:59, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Brave, the Movie

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep and refine to Brave § Film and television. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 02:32, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects were the result of moving the page about the 1994 film to the title Brave (film) (which was later redirected to the current target's "Film and television" section)—the first redirect to the second and the second to the "(film)" title. These redirects haven't gotten very many pageviews nowadays, so I'm not 100% sure they're really helpful here. I think we should either delete them, or, if they're kept, refine them to Brave#Film and television, though I'm open to other courses of action if they're suitable. Regards, SONIC678 19:08, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Aero blue

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 October 7#Aero blue

Template:Cita

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Read to the end of the discussion for tips on how to fix future red-linked translusions of this template. wbm1058 (talk) 15:08, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was presumably created for es:Template:Cita, the Spanish Wikipedia's Template:Blockquote equivalent. However, it is also inappropriately used sometimes for it:Template:Cita, which is a citation template. Both of these foreign templates use unnamed parameters, so the difference isn't always noticed. I would suggest that English editors will be confused by this name and not sure what it means. I'm not opposed to foreign-language template redirects in general, but when they are ambiguous, I think they should certainly be removed. Daask (talk) 13:40, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Event Pokemon

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Gameplay of Pokémon#Distributions. ✗plicit 06:39, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

uh... retarget to gameplay of pokémon#distributions? cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 13:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the proposed target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:56, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:53, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget. It's what it's called. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:49, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_September_29&oldid=1250792435"