Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 5

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

December 5

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 5, 2024.

Specialization in bees

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 18#Specialization in bees

antiwhatever, helminth

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 17#antiwhatever, helminth

Heavy vehicle

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 19#Heavy vehicle

London Bridge task force

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 17:52, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-namespace redirect that hasn't been linked anywhere for the year it's been in mainspace, and that doesn't seem especially convenient or important to warrant a mainspace-to-Wikipedia redirect. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:28, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per wp:returntored - sources posted above show that this had enough coverage to be a mainspace article, so redirect should be deleted to encourage article creation. BugGhost 🦗👻 00:57, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not deserve a cross-namespace redirect. * Pppery * it has begun... 21:56, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Calicrat

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 13#Calicrat

Quest for Thelda

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:42, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. QuicoleJR (talk) 17:15, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment - "The Quest for Thelda" was a Zelda 1 clone with just barely enough changes to avoid a copyright claim, made for the TRS-80 Model III, made by "Sundog Systems". It might be article or list-inclusion worthy, I'm not certain. Fieari (talk) 23:47, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    @Fieari: If it is notable, RETURNTORED applies. If it is not notable, it still isn't mentioned at the target. Either way, it should be deleted. QuicoleJR (talk) 01:32, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, I had some time so I did a little snooping around for sources. I can find reliable but purely routine coverage that this game existed (that is, purchasing catalogs and magazines posting lists of titles "released this month!"), and I can find a lot of unreliable (blogs, forums, fan pages, and youtube) sources that cover it in more detail, but nothing reliable that has anything substantial. The sources would be barely enough to be included on a hypothetical "list of CoCo 3 software" but we don't even have such an article, and I'm somewhat doubtful one is even warranted. Pity, it does seem like a fascinating historical artifact of the time, but video games just weren't treated seriously for analysis or review at the time so there's no record of discussion about it. And modern retrospectives are rarely done for games of this time period, or only for the big names. Fieari (talk) 04:50, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Saw a gameplay video, literally just Zelda 1 on a different console User:Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 05:01, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Guren Island

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:04, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in target. QuicoleJR (talk) 16:20, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Japanese name for Cinnabar Island, which is mentioned but is not an existing redirect. Probably just delete. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 10:41, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Lymbriciform

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 12#Lymbriciform

Ascensorium

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 December 12#Ascensorium

Sanduíche

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:41, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

no particular affinity with portuguese (whatever that is). created because the creator thinks sandwiches are good. e tá certo kkk cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:45, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete because while i agree with the creator this is not WP:FORRED compliant in the slightest Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 06:13, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Sonnich

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 02:41, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unmentioned. apparently plaudietch for "sunny". results gave me random guys and... sonichu... why do i feel my sins crawling on my back cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 12:40, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mex-Mex

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Cremastra ‹ u — c › 12:37, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

obscure synonym. results gave me sneks (really cute ones at that), keyboards, and assorted restaurant names. as noted in the creation, an explanation is provided in tex-mex cuisine in houston, though in passing, and i don't think it'd be better off retargeted there. as is, it might be a somewhat plausible misremembering of tex-mex, but i'm not really too keen on that cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:33, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a neologism and it is used in reliable sources. 1983 New York Magazine; 2007 U.S. newspaper; 2012 book; 2014 book; 2017 book; 2023 book; -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 04:28, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:55, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

comment: an ip added a mention to the target cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 20:36, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The Most Famous Barbadian

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:39, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(NPP action) This isn't an alternative name or title – it's just a statement about Rihanna (which isn't what redirects are meant for) and it's not supported by the target article. jlwoodwa (talk) 02:27, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep To be fair, she is the most famous Barbadian by a landslide. Someone-123-321 (I contribute, Talk page so SineBot will shut up) 08:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_December_5&oldid=1263906637"