Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 17

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

September 17

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 17, 2023.

Lək̓ʷəŋən

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Duckmather (talk) 01:41, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect is from the IPA on the page. I'm guessing the creator misunderstood it for something in the native language. greyzxq talk 21:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Where else do you suggest it be redirected?
Enquire (talk) 21:37, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest it be deleted, the likelihood of anyone searching the IPA instead of the term itself is highly unlikely. greyzxq talk 22:35, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Greyzxq: I think many west coast First Nations use at least parts of the IPA for their orthography, making this slightly more plausible. I could be totally wrong about this, though. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 22:26, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per below. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 12:56, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - The web is as much about the threads of the web as it is the web pages themselves. Lək̓ʷəŋən is how the Songhees Nation describe themselves and so it is important to be able to find the relevant article from this word. Some would consider deletion of this redirect as an example of colonial attempts to erase First Nations culture and language. At a time when we are trying to achieve reconciliation with First Nations, it is important to be inclusive and respectful.
Enquire (talk) 04:28, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Political song

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Music and politics. (non-admin closure) Duckmather (talk) 01:42, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not all political ideas are about revolution. Protest song would be a better target but is still misleading e.g. conservative/anti-social movement songs would be political but not protest. — Bilorv (talk) 20:02, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to music and politics. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 11:27, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I didn't realise Music and politics was an article, but it looks like a good target to me. — Bilorv (talk) 09:57, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Invest 91-L

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 25#Invest 91-L

Invest 98L

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 25#Invest 98L

Invest 99-L

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 25#Invest 99-L

Microsoft (version) redirects

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Duckmather (talk) 01:50, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Same reason redirects like Microsoft 95, Microsoft 2000, Microsoft 7, Microsoft 8, and Microsoft 8.1 were deleted: All are implausible redirects; I don't see anyone referring to a Windows version as a "Microsoft (version)". Colgatepony234 (talk) 16:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: harmless. I'l quote from my Disjointed thoughts on RfD and redirects: Likely search terms should be kept, and borderline cases should be kept too, as potentially helpful. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 19:48, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, these seem like they can be likely search terms. Utopes (talk / cont) 00:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep or make disambig pages if the multiple versioned products is a big enough concern. Windows is the most likely item to be searched with these terms. Redirects don't have a notability requirement. - Darker Dreams (talk) 01:36, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Seeing how these four redirects exist, but the five in the red links got deleted doesn't feel consistent... should we have those recreated if this discussion ends in keep? At this point it feels like either delete these four, or recreate those five for consistency. Colgatepony234 (talk) 03:03, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Note: three of those deletes were from 2014, three were speedy-deleted as late as 2018 (one was recreated a handful of times and kept getting speedy-deleted based on the prior RfD), previous RfD for 2 of these are noted above as keeps in 2015 and 2021. If we're keeping these consistency would say we should extend that to restoring all. Either way, maybe there should be some sort of "mass action" note on each for the group? - Darker Dreams (talk) 12:19, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I’d support recreating them if this discussion ends in ‘keep’. IIRC from checking earlier, at least one of them was deleted previously at a RfD; but I’d argue that a ‘keep’ vote here would signal that consensus has changed. Best, user:A smart kittenmeow
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Efectul Von Restorff

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 04:30, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Romanian-language translation of article name, which has no connection to Romania ArcticSeeress (talk) 16:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Invest 93L

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 27#Invest 93L

Hindu language

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 14:59, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could also refer to the Sanskrit language used in Hindu texts like the Vedas Isla (talk) 18:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unimportant comment: Keep with hatnote??? But hatnote is being discussed as a redirect right above this discussion, and there hasn't been any argument to keep it... Kind of suspicious... Utopes (talk / cont) 04:59, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Most likely to be a misspelling of Hindi. Rreagan007 (talk) 15:48, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Retarget with hatnote to Sanskrit. If someone wants to search for the "hindu language" referring to sanskrit, and they are redirected to hindi (against their choice) which has a hatnote "for the hindu language, follow this link", that is not great page design in my opinion. If I were the searcher in that situation, I feel I would be annoyed that my typo was redirected to an article I didn't want, with the actual article I correctly typed in being linked as a hatnote; it may feel like we "expect people to get the name wrong before we believe people intended to search for the hindu language".
I'm not an expert in this area so I'm not sure which is a more accurate description of "hindu language"; hindi or sanskrit. Whichever situation is the best description, I don't think we should treat this as a "typo of anything" because I feel seeking out the hindu language is a valid search term. So, whichever target is the more accurate "hindu language" should be the redirect target, with the other option being listed as a hatnote. My perspective is that sanskrit is more accurate for this task. Utopes (talk / cont) 17:18, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep, retarget, or disambiguate? I'm reading Haoreima's "keep" !vote as "disambiguate".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 16:20, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Hatnote

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. There continues to be significant support for both deletion and keeping, with a minority in favor of redirecting to Listen to Wikipedia. signed, Rosguill talk 14:58, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Previous RfDs for this redirect and similar redirects:

Bad XNR. QuicoleJR (talk) 19:36, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:47, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete, keep or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 16:18, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep or retarget with hatnote. "People can find" arguments against WP: space redirects or hatnotes assume experienced, educated, currently fresh users. New users or those who have taken breaks may well encounter WP jargon and not remember exactly how to get to the right WP-space article. Darker Dreams (talk) 23:44, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Vixy Reinard

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 22#Vixy Reinard

Countrycore

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 29#Countrycore

Bloodbenders

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3). (non-admin closure) Duckmather (talk) 01:45, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unhelpful: no mention at target. (NPP action) Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 14:58, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ideally, this (and Bloodbending) would link to World of Avatar: The Last Airbender, but that makes no mention of it either. It's first appearance in the show is in the third season, so Avatar: The Last Airbender (season 3) is probably the best place to link to. ArcticSeeress (talk) 15:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Attha

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 25#Attha

Dia De Los Muertos (2014 film)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 14:56, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The film uses Día de los Muertos as a backdrop, but it isn't mentioned as the name of the film anywhere on the page or any other language versions of Wikipedia. I cannot find this film being called Dia De Los Muertos anywhere on the internet. ArcticSeeress (talk) 10:59, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Baba Sathya Sai

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 27#Baba Sathya Sai

Winde (medical symptom)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Flatulence. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:47, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The closest connection I can fathom is "Winde" = obsolete spelling of "Wind"; "Wind" = abdominal gas; abdominal gas = abdominal gas = abdominal pain. Maybe I'm missing something, but this seems like a very unlikely search term. No evidence "Winde" was ever actually used to refer to abdominal pain. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 15:35, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Retarget to flatulence, which is the target of intestinal gas. Pain can be caused by gas but gas is a symptom in and of itself. Wiktionary indicates that "winde" is an obsolete spelling of "wind", as in "passing wind", i.e. passing gas. It's also a word for "to wind" (as in winding something up, winding a crank, etc.) in several Germanic languages, but that's not a medical symptom. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:58, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:19, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Wikipedia:ImplausibleTypos

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow • talk 12:21, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Odd CamelCase redirect created in 2017. Ironically enough, this is an implausible typo. * Pppery * it has begun... 04:01, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Since both keep !votes are "weak".
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:12, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Multi-member university

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 24#Multi-member university

Phoebe Russell

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 24#Phoebe Russell

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_September_17&oldid=1177700707"