Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 7

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

November 7

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 7, 2023.

I regret nothing

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15#I regret nothing

Opps

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Move OPPS to this title. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:34, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have never seen the word "opps" refer to this. One mention of that term on Wikipedia is the song titled that on Black Panther: The Album, which that has redirected to for a while. Searching up "opps" here on Wikipedia displays some pages that use the word "opps" in a different way either as an abbreviation or for something else, such as Red Opps and OPPS. Suggesting a disambiguation in this case. 1033Forest (talk) 22:49, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Mythology of Kosovo

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15#Mythology of Kosovo

UGA vs TCU

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Tamzin's argument that a disambiguation page would really amount to a list without a notability assertion has gone unrebutted. * Pppery * it has begun... 02:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not the only match-up between the two schools funplussmart (talk) 12:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As the redirect creator, I redirected UGA vs. TCU to the 2023 College Football Playoff National Championship. It is the biggest game that the two teams have ever played together. They played four non-notable games before the National Championship, per Here! Yoshiman6464 â™«đŸ„š 13:11, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment 2 but looking closely, yeeeeah - they played together at the 2016 Liberty Bowl. I think the redirect could be a disambugation page. Yoshiman6464 â™«đŸ„š 13:16, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 14:59, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate per above, from author MicrobiologyMarcus (petri dish‱cultures) 15:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further comments for disambiguation, such as possible entries for the page?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:48, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: DABify or just delete? (final relist)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Edward-Woodrow (talk) 21:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

𝕏

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Blackboard bold#Usage. as more helpful to the reader than the current target. Consensus against retargeting to Twitter (X). (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow (talk) 00:07, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I propose disambiguating. Any opposition? Formigable (talk) 18:05, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What other article(s) are you proposing to disambiguate this with? Thryduulf (talk) 18:09, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Twitter. -- Tavix (talk) 18:34, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Tavix is right. Formigable (talk) 19:23, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean by disambiguating? Do you mean a dab page with at least two targets? in this case, what are the other targets? Your proposition may also be understood as a suggegtion for renaming the redirect. In this case, what is the suggested title? D.Lazard (talk) 18:14, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The disambiguated pages would be the current target (U 1D54F: MATHEMATICAL DOUBLE-STRUCK CAPITAL X, which according to Wiktionary is used to refer to arbitrary metric space), and Twitter. The reason I started this discussion is because the target was originally Twitter and the current target mentions it irrelevantly and unnecessarily.
The target could also be X (disambiguation)#Other uses. Formigable (talk) 19:31, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
So should we redirect 🎯 to Target Corporation or đŸȘŸ to Microsoft Windows? No. If there is no primary topic for a symbol, the best bet would be to redirect it to an article that discusses these symbols in larger context. Awesome Aasim 19:56, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep, disambiguate, or retarget?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 07:30, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

User:TechnoSquirrel69, I don’t really understand how much clearer the consensus need to be. I can’t be a much clearer consensus to keep than this. Tvx1 20:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I obviously disagree. There have been decent arguments for retargeting and a couple of suggestions for disambiguation (including the nomination). —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:32, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Retarget or keep?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Edward-Woodrow (talk) 21:41, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

List of Beatles members

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep the "line-ups" redirects as is, retarget the rest to The Beatles#Personnel. Unfortunately, I don't see consensus quite as clearly as Pppery does. There seems to be a distinct split on whether just the "line-up" redirects should be kept as is, or both "line-ups" and "list" redirects kept as is. It wasn't until Carlinal's subsequent comment that the scales tipped toward just the "line-up" redirects. -- Tavix (talk) 17:17, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly not the same topic. Beatles members are John, Paul, George and Ringo (plus Pete Best). The target of the redirect lists everyone who was in a band involving these five. Pichpich (talk) 16:11, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:48, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Edward-Woodrow (talk) 21:39, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

2022 Youth Sailing World Championships

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. (Yes, I participated in this discussion, but I do not consider myself involved because I did not opine on the redirect itself.) -- Tavix (talk) 17:04, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:REDLINK to encourage creation. None of the other years have a redirect. Qwerfjkltalk 18:27, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 19:43, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jay: The 2020 edition was cancelled because of covid, not 2022. The 2022 edition was held in The Hague from 10–14 July. -- Tavix (talk) 19:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Struck. Jay 💬 05:22, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

APOSPORY (locus)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a genetic locus in Arabidopsis thaliana. The target article discusses a homologous locus in Hypericum perforatum, but APOSPORY isn't mentioned in any Arabidopsis related article on Wikipedia. Delete. Plantdrew (talk) 18:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

ARI7

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a gene in Arabidopsis thaliana. The target article discusses a homologous gene in Hypericum perforatum, but ARI7 isn't mentioned in any Arabidopsis related article on Wikipedia. Delete. Plantdrew (talk) 18:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The relevant content was just removed from the article. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

ARIADNE7

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is a protein in Arabidopsis thaliana. The target article discusses a homologous gene in Hypericum perforatum, but ARIADNE7 isn't mentioned in any Arabidopsis related article on Wikipedia. Delete. Plantdrew (talk) 18:44, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The relevant content was just removed from the article. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 04:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

HAPPY

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. -- Tavix (talk) 17:00, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Zefr:, I hadn't realized the user was responsible for including that section in the H. perforatum article (which is a Good Article). I think the whole edit should be deleted. It's in the same spirit as the medical spam (a study found a chemical in this plant that has an in vitro effect) in plant articles that you frequently deal with. Plants have a whole bunch of chemical in them. Plants have a whole bunch of genes in them too, and of course those genes are going to have homologs in Arabidopsis thaliana since that's the best studied plant genetically. Plantdrew (talk) 20:46, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Visions (TV series

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Broken redirect title. Correct title is at Visions (TV series). Gonnym (talk) 17:40, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Native American clothing

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:43, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Should this not redirect to Native American fashion? Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 19:19, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 20:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 15:35, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is over 574 Federally recognized Tribes in the United States and that's just the ones that have gained federal recognition. There are and were literally thousands of Tribes across the America's, all with their unique and rich histories, cultures and clothing. Personally, I think this the wrong route to go by pushing it into one article and it was better as a category or disambig. There isn't an article on Traditional European clothing, Traditional African clothing, Tradition Asian clothing. This is what typically happens with Native Americans and I don't really understand it. I don't believe it's in bad faith but the natural tendency is to always reduce our cultures to fit in one box together. That's not done with any other race of people or ethnic group. It actually has the opposite affect and it cheapens the experience. I disagree with this but I will yield to consensus as always. --ARoseWolf 12:17, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please go take the disambiguation route. This Traditional Native American clothing stub is mainly a list of Plains clothing with some ceremonial items that aren't just "clothing" or "fashion". Plus "traditional" is a heavily loaded, subjective term—"traditional" at what time period and to whom? Agree with User:ARoseWolf, there are 574 tribes here, and there's a good reason why the editors most familiar with this subject matter haven't attempted to create an article like this. Yuchitown (talk) 14:52, 10 November 2023 (UTC)Yuchitown[reply]
I concur with ARoseWolf and Yuchitown. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 18:36, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'll go with the dabify route with this article as an additional entry there. --Lenticel (talk) 01:49, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Dilbert guy

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 15#Dilbert guy

Theatrical mask

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Mask#Masks in theatre,. (non-admin closure) Edward-Woodrow (talk) 00:08, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Target is a sourceless stub that makes no mention of "theatrical masks" other than 2 muses that are associated with them. ― Blaze WolfTalkblaze__wolf 15:16, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

đŸ’â€â™€ïž

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 20#đŸ’â€â™€ïž

đŸ«—

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 20#đŸ«—

Adachigahara

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 18#Adachigahara

Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. The consensus seems to be that the 2023 Israeli invasion of the Gaza Strip is currently the primary topic for the general term. The location of the disambiguation page currently at Invasion of Gaza can be decided with a requested move. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 06:36, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This could also refer to the 2014 Gaza war, when Israel also invaded the Gaza strip. I don't see a primary topic between the 2014 war and the ongoing invasion at this point, so it might be wise to have this be or point at a dab. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:08, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See also: a related discussion. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 00:09, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Keep or disambiguate?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Edward-Woodrow (talk) 13:19, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:Merge and delete, the redirect needs to be kept for attribution purposes. Thryduulf (talk) 14:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ugh... Licensing. Legalese can be such a barrier to understandability.
Changing to Keep, for now. Perhaps some cleaning could be done to merge this with Invasion of Gaza at some point, but it's probably not worth getting into now. PhotogenicScientist (talk) 16:32, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Punk police

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 12:34, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This term isn't mentioned in the article, and I could find no clear evidence of a connection. 2A00:23C6:880C:E101:A18F:AC91:9177:E79F (talk) 12:13, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Google results are entirely about songs - it's a suprisingly popular title but none of them appear more notable than any of the others and none have mentions on Wikipedia. The only uses on Wikipedia are partial title matches for three different non-notable songs and a partial title match for a non-notable compilation album. Thryduulf (talk) 12:49, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Poema

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate and boldly retargeted the plural form Poemas there as an {{R from plural}}. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:32, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This term (apparently simply the word for "poem" in various foreign languages, judging by the titles of the equivalent articles on other Wikipedias) isn't mentioned in the article, and I could find no evidence of a connection. 2A00:23C6:880C:E101:A18F:AC91:9177:E79F (talk) 12:09, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Draft:Genie (film)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ambiguous, now that Genie (2023 film) and Genie (upcoming Indian film) are both in the mainspace. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:40, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Regional university

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 18#Regional university

Seclusion room

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 November 18#Seclusion room

Larrin

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 07:06, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Does not exist at target article, having been deemed not an actual recurring character in this edit 2.5 years ago. Zaathras (talk) 05:29, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

Digital wealth

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Does not seem to be a synonym. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 05:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2023_November_7&oldid=1186126226"