Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 8

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

October 8

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 8, 2022.

Visual display unit

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Computer monitor. ✗plicit 00:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retarget to Computer monitor, which literally states the subject was formerly called a "visual display unit". The recent back and forth retargeting of this redirect and the reasons why are in the redirect's edit history. Steel1943 (talk) 23:45, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Moldavie

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 00:07, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:FORRED, there is no particular affinity between Moldova and French. Languages of Moldova notes it only as a foreign language that is sometimes the first foreign language taught in schools (but by implication less often than English). Wiktionary notes that the word can mean either Moldova (the country) or Moldavia (the region of Romanina) but fr.wp has the country as primary topic, so if this isn't deleted I don't think it should be retargetted. Thryduulf (talk) 23:41, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Central Bessarabia

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 16#Central Bessarabia

Romanian Republic of Moldova

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 16#Romanian Republic of Moldova

Template:Es

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 16#Template:Es

Jake Gomez (Marvel Cinematic Universe)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 00:08, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The character Jake Gomez did not appear in the Marvel Cinematic Universe TV special Werewolf by Night as was made to believe in several sources, particularly from this one and this initial one which spurred it into other articles. The Maya-Gomez info was traced to an unverified IMDb profile. The character didn't appear, and as such, this redirect should be deleted. All mentions of an MCU Gomez are removed at the target and the special's article. Trailblazer101 (talk) 21:17, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shree Padmakshi renuka, kawade-alibag

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Legoktm (talk) 02:59, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm attempting to clean up after Aairenuka956's attempts to hijack various articles and turn them into a page about this temple. None of the resulting redirects point to any page pertaining to that temple, and there's currently no mainspace article about it either, so these should all be deleted. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 19:05, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Joe Trudeau

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 15#Joe Trudeau

Bʹelarusʹ

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. Patent nonsense Firsfron of Ronchester 11:05, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any uses of this (unlike "Belarus'"), Google translate regards it as Russian, giving the English as "Bʹlarusʹ" so it might be some sort of slang or slurred ponunciation? Whatever, I can find no evidence this is a useful redirect on the English Wikipedia. Thryduulf (talk) 16:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've just seen that a few days after creating this redirect in 2018, the creator (Учхљёная) was blocked by Tavix for creating patent nonsense (they were later indeffed for other reasons) so this might be speedily deletable as G1 but I'm going to leave it here for other opinions just in case. Thryduulf (talk) 16:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Buelorussia

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 18:36, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is an extremely rare transliteration that seems only to be used by people from or with some connection to Israel or derivatives of this redirect. The redirect gets less than ten uses a year. Thryduulf (talk) 16:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Foreign language redirects to Belarus

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 15#Foreign language redirects to Belarus

Moldovans in Germany

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Moldovan diaspora. Jay 💬 18:28, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Having "Moldovans in Germany" redirect to "Romanians in Germany" is a very bad idea. Besides the fact that "Romanians in Germany" doesn't mention mention Moldovans in the article at all, the debate over whether Moldovans are a subgroup of Romanians or a separate ethnic group seems to be a very intense one so I don't think conflating Moldovans and Romanians like this is a good idea. I'm not sure if I articulated this quite right, but hopefully I've made my case. ~Cherri of Arctic Circle System (talk) 14:42, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Siemens ELFA

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 18:24, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page does not disambiguate "Siemens ELFA". The term is mentioned 7 time in Enwiki [1] but none of those pages is a good target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:33, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Showstopper bug

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Software bug#Showstopper. Jay 💬 18:21, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This page doesn't disambiguate "showstopper bug" and the only article in Enwiki that mentions the term (Neverwinter Nights 2: "one reviewer encountered a "showstopper bug" in the initial retail version") isn't a good target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 14:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Athletics/Alumni Center

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Legoktm (talk) 03:00, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Too generic of a term to redirect to the "Athletics/Alumni Center" bullet mentioned at its current target section. Suggesting delete. —CX Zoom[he/him] (let's talk • {C•X}) 14:04, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Тайфун Майсак

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 15#Тайфун Майсак

Kathleen Hammond

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete. G7'd by Victuallers. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 11:20, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Per target article, Kathy Hammond's full first name is Kathryn, not Kathleen. There are a few Kathleen Hammonds who are at least little-n notable, like this academic and this book reviewer [2] [3], the latter of whom is who I was looking for when I came upon this redirect. Suggest deleting as misleading. -- Tamzin[cetacean needed] (she|they|xe) 10:09, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please go ahead and delete.--Ipigott (talk) 10:11, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done Victuallers (talk) 11:18, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pantheon (structure)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Pantheon (structure) to Pantheon#Buildings and memorials. Pantheon (structure) to Pantheon#Buildings and memorials

Pantheon (temple) to Pantheon, Rome Avoiding redirects to Disambiguation pages. Firsfron of Ronchester 05:55, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A better target might be Pantheon (religion)#Extension of the concept into structures and celebrities or disambiguation page Pantheon. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:36, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: There are 3 targets suggested for Pantheon (temple).
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 09:25, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Sir Peter Brook

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. However added the {{R from incorrect title}} tag. Jay 💬 18:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Never knighted. ‑‑Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 23:35, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 00:43, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: I guess the question comes down to are people more likely to misspell Peter Brooke as Peter Brook or mistake Peter Brook who is a CBE for being titled as Sir Peter Brook. TartarTorte 18:59, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 07:59, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pridnestrovnia

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 09:13, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Misspelling, the title was supposed to be "Pridnestrovie" which does exist. This spelling gives 0 Google results. Super Ψ Dro 07:55, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Red Tigress

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Without prejudice to recreation when a mention is added. Jay 💬 06:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blood Heir is the first book in a series. Red Tigress is the second book. It is not mentioned anywhere in en.wp, not even in the Blood Heir. MB 03:14, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • I had meant to slightly enlarge the article Blood Heir to mention that it is the first volume in a trilogy, and to mention the other two books in the trilogy. However, due in part to real life worries, I haven't done that yet. With luck, that might happen soon. Cardamon 19:51, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 05:10, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Insider attack

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus / retarget to Insider threat. Even though consensus is not entirely clear, the nom's proposal seems to be the preferred option among participants late in the discussion. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 09:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Too specific a target for such a broad term. Suggest retarget to insider threat. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:48, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 21:26, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:47, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: One more try at some form of consensus...
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 02:54, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Legoktm (talk) 01:40, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at target. Previous content was a poorly written duplicate article that included copyvios and spam. Only other creation by the creator Heavyequipment4u (talk · contribs) was a promotional userpage. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:44, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 09:45, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further research, data broker is probably a more appropriate target. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 15:41, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Legoktm (talk) 01:56, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • The uppercased version should have targeted a search engine software or service with that name (if there is one). The lowercased version is protected (but that was more than a decade ago) but it could be a standalone article at people search or people-search, or at a minimum we could have a list of people-search engines. I don't see data broker as a target although it mentions one people search product. There are multiple such products on enwiki hence delete per Shhhnotsoloud. Jay 💬 09:57, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Buddhism in Mizoram

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:59, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Buddhism in Mizoram(State) has been created, which is mistitled. I had intended to move to Buddhism in Mizoram but this is presently a redirect. Goldsztajn (talk) 01:23, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Aerial art

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 15#Aerial art

Locally small category

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 15#Locally small category

People finder

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was disambiguate. Legoktm (talk) 03:01, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Overly generic redirect, since search results are for information brokers. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 07:48, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 08:05, 30 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 01:06, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

UNIHD

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 October 15#UNIHD

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2022_October_8&oldid=1206982877"