Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 7

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

September 7

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 7, 2021.

Seasonal temperature variation

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 00:29, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deletion. This goes to one concept related to seasonal temperature variation, but does not cover seasonal temperature variation in general. Conceivably we could also just redirect to season but I think it's better just to leave blank for future article development. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:02, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep. I agree with the nom that the target does not fully address the topic indicated by the redirect, but I think the ideal future solution would be to expand the target article to include such content and then consider a page move to this title. It seems both the nominator and creator of the redirect want an article that is a good parallel to diurnal air temperature variation, and I concur. But I don't think we need a separate article on seasonal temperature variation and seasonal lag, as the two are so closely related, so redlinking here doesn't make sense. Mdewman6 (talk) 17:51, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I created the redirect; I figured it was the closest content we had, and would adequately give anyone following the link an encyclopedic overview of the meaning of the phrase. I've template-categorized the redirect as a Template:R from less specific name to make that clear (just learned I could do that!). I'd have no objections to a separate article on seasonal temperature variation if a good one can be written. Seasonal lag seems large enough that expanding it into a broader-concept article might be a bit difficult, but if anyone wanted to do that I'd be fine with it too. HLHJ (talk) 02:29, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 22:27, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Hot chips

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 15#Hot chips

Template:Country data Zimbabwe Rhodesia

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Reverse the redirect by moving the target over the redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 12:51, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Originally nominated for deletion by @ColorfulSmoke with the reason "incorrect name, Zimbabwe-Rhodesia should be moved to Zimbabwe Rhodesia" FASTILY 22:04, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Round-Robin Move {{Country data Zimbabwe-Rhodesia}} to {{Country data Zimbabwe Rhodesia}}, leaving a redirect in the former location. The article explains that "Zimbabwe Rhodesia" was the country's official name. – Jonesey95 (talk) 00:29, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

150mm cannon (PlanetSide)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 00:29, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All these redirects appear to be minor game items and should be removed - none are mentioned in target article and such redirects are confusing for WP readers. -Liancetalk/contribs 21:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Never Say Why

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 00:28, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Name of non-notable fan comic, not mentioned at source article in any way -Liancetalk/contribs 21:29, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Religion task force/Assessment

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G6, unambiguously created in error. -- Tavix (talk) 16:07, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

same as previous nomination, obvious error dudhhrContribs 19:13, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Wikipedia:WikiProject Countering systemic bias/Religion task force

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G6, unambiguously created in error. -- Tavix (talk) 16:08, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure if this qualifies for R3. Only existed for 3 minutes, obviously erroneous. dudhhrContribs 19:11, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Ahmed Jan

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. signed, Rosguill talk 04:59, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any results relevant to the target when searching this name online and on Google Scholar; all results appear to be about unrelated individuals named Ahmed Jan. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:31, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


I initially created the page due to Sultan Ahmed Khan being called in various british accounts as Ahmed Jan (see these pages: https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/OW18630411.2.9 https://trove.nla.gov.au/newspaper/article/13072787 https://books.google.com/books?id=lWtDAAAAcAAJ&pg=PA581&lpg=PA581&dq=ahmed jan herat 1863&source=bl&ots=lehtry0QFv&sig=ACfU3U0zE2JCBlx5zfw5GscSvvQ0oReAtw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiU6J3Ixu3yAhX2MlkFHSTQDrwQ6AF6BAgnEAM#v=onepage&q=ahmed jan herat 1863&f=false https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/1862-05-29/debates/addca591-f11d-4777-b978-6eebaf18fcf8/AffairsOfCentralAsia https://books.google.com/books?id=9rk5AQAAIAAJ&pg=PA221&lpg=PA221&dq=ahmed jan herat&source=bl&ots=OG8HahMYYP&sig=ACfU3U1dw3l3muDbXs-gQn0O-y5x-36Usw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwir49uIxu3yAhVDGFkFHSX1DfYQ6AF6BAgoEAM#v=onepage&q=ahmed jan herat&f=false https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Herat_from_the_Citadel.png). I see what you mean though, and I think now it might just be better to include that a common name for him was Ahmed Jan in the article now instead of making a separate redirect. Kailanmapper (talk) 19:09, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why not both? - There should be a mention in the article and a redirect, so keep. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:45, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair point. I suggest we wait for the administrator who made this discussion to reply though. Rosguill, what do you think about this? Does this sound like a good compromise? Kailanmapper (talk) 03:53, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Woops, only just saw this. Keeping seems fine given the evidence. signed, Rosguill talk 00:28, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dark spider man

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to List of incarnations of Spider-Man#Ai Apaec. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:00, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Does not appear to be an alternative name for Venom, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:30, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

I'VE

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 01:00, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:18, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill: It's the name for the label's upcoming girl group. Btspurplegalaxy (talk) 19:22, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Governor Moonbeam"

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 00:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion because of a typo (extra "). UserTwoSix (talk) 18:01, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Biachini Crater

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 12:43, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My preference would be to delete this misspelling, but if kept it should be retargeted to Bianchini (lunar crater) which is the target of Bianchini (crater). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Viewers like you

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 00:17, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Viewers like you" refers to how public broadcasting stations ask their viewers to contribute money towards operating their stations. An underwriting spot has nothing to do with viewers - instead it refers to government or corporate contributors who are allowed to broadcast short messages. I'm not clear on what the target should be for this phrase. Previously it targeted Public broadcasting service, which may be an appropriate target. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:38, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Flash Communications

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 September 20#Flash Communications

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2021_September_7&oldid=1085561635"