Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 28

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on May 28, 2021.

Kamagethi dynasty

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Feel free to recreate if a sourced mention is added. -- Tavix (talk) 16:36, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, no results on Google Scholar, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 16:38, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Compassionate727 (T·C) 14:59, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

George Fan

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 02:43, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:XY readers could equally be searching for others games he has been involved in like Octogeddon.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 19:14, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:31, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Transnational issues of the Glorioso Islands

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Glorioso Islands. signed, Rosguill talk 05:46, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stub long-ago merged (no attribution necessary), the current target doesn't provide any useful information for this quite unlikely search term. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:47, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:32, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: This appears to be a relic from the earliest days of Wikipedia, when, I guess, it was common to place subtopics like this at subpages (i.e., this would originally have been located at Glorioso Islands/Transnational issues, which does indeed exist). When Wikipedia's programming language switched from UseModWiki to the PHP script back in January 2002, all of those pages were automatically moved from "Topic/Subtopic" to "Subtopic of Topic" titles. Of course, having a foreign affairs subtopic for the Glorioso Islands was silly, so it was redirected later that year. I don't know if this has any value as an {{R with old history}}; in any case, if it is kept, it should be retargetted back to Glorioso Islands. Compassionate727 (T·C) 14:40, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 23:49, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Oulo

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 5#Oulo

MKSA system

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 5#MKSA system

Ofenbach

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 5#Ofenbach

Next National Assembly for Wales election

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Elections in Wales#2026. Nominally no consensus, defaulting to retarget over deletion as no one has expressed any preference for the status quo. signed, Rosguill talk 05:34, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects are no longer necessary. There will never be another 'National Assembly for Wales' election. While I can understand why this page may have been retained for the 2021 election, given the recent name change, that rationale no longer applies, and there is no valid target to redirect this to now. RGloucester 15:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:28, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 18:47, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Next Welsh Assembly Election

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Elections in Wales#2026. signed, Rosguill talk 05:32, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

These redirects are no longer necessary. There will never be another 'National Assembly for Wales' election. While I can understand why this page may have been retained for the 2021 election, given the recent name change, that rationale no longer applies, and there is no valid target to redirect this to now. RGloucester 15:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete but not for the nominator's reason (I think it's reasonable to assume that a user might use the obsolete term for the Senedd) but because we have no suitable target article. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 12:58, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Compassionate727 (T·C) 15:28, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 18:47, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Katie Britt

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 5#Katie Britt

Required supplementary information

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Financial statement. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:23, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned in the target, so a reader who searches for this is given no indication of what it means. The only articles that mention this in the body are AICPA Statements of Position and Statements on Auditing Standards (United States), neither of which seems like a viable target. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 16:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of Perry Mason episode murderers

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Restore article and send to AfD. signed, Rosguill talk 05:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fork of List of Perry Mason episodes by an editor trying to avoid consensus on the page. Not an actual search term. Calton | Talk 14:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • That discussion resolved that the information should not be added to the existing list. There was nothing about that discussion that would preclude creating a separate list, and the venue to determine consensus on the suitability of that separate list is AfD, not your unilateral declaration that it can't be done. You contend that forking the list is an end-run around consensus; I counter that your blanking of it is out-of-process speedy deletion. Ivanvector's squirrel (trees/nuts) 12:26, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

シルバー・ザ・ヘッジホッグ

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:20, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:R#DELETE#8 / WP:RLOTE, " In particular, redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created." A number of similar redirects can be found linking to this list, but before mass nominating I thought I should seek consensus on just one first.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 13:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Philip Thomas Tucker

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 5#Philip Thomas Tucker

The creation of Nazo and Silver the hedgehog

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 12:40, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely search term. Dominicmgm (talk) 17:20, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, plicit 03:50, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 10:15, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Heiwa Island

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted per G5. -- Tavix (talk) 16:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose deletion of first redirect. Propose disambiguation of second redirect between Showa Station (Antarctica) and Shōwa Iōjima. Propose retarget of third redirect to List of islands in Japan#Islands in Tokyo Bay. Don't know what are these actually referring to. 122.60.46.122 (talk) 09:51, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Kudanzaka

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 5#Kudanzaka

Dōngjīng (Japan)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 4#Dōngjīng (Japan)

Oyata

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 5#Oyata

The Metropolis

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Metropolis (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 07:17, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Propose retarget to Metropolis (disambiguation). London is not the only metropolis. 122.60.46.122 (talk) 09:06, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nessa Barrett

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 4#Nessa Barrett