Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 26

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

September 26

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on September 26, 2020.

Darryl W. Perry

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 5#Darryl W. Perry

Sebastianus (Roman general)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 17:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all. "General" is anachronistic and vague in the subject's context, and its use is discouraged by WP:ROMANS. The redirect links aren't used anywhere important, so a deletion will result in no disruptions. Avis11 (talk) 21:40, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Redirects from NC/ND license templates to Template:Db-f3

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 6#Redirects from NC/ND license templates to Template:Db-f3

List of people who have seen Titanic

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete per WP:SNOW and WP:POINT. Thryduulf (talk) 13:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Ridiculous WP:POINTy redirect made in response to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people who have learned Transcendental Meditation. Obviously not a likely search term, not linked from any article, not really related to the target Reywas92Talk

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Bharatiya jinnah party

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 17:45, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence that this term is used for the target (Bharatiya Janata Party) by reliable sources; seems to be an epithet created by a rival party. Given the history of antagonism toward Muhammad Ali Jinnah from the BJP, likely meant as a pejorative. Not discussed anywhere in the target article. Unlikely search term. Vanamonde (Talk) 19:12, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Crownvirus

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. signed, Rosguill talk 17:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirect. "Crown virus" could also be a mispelling of Clown Virus, so this is an ambiguous mispelling. We do not have the redirect Crownvirus disease 2019, so these are the only mentions of "crownvirus" in enwiki. Also, this redirect was created 2 months ago. Seventyfiveyears (talk) 15:17, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, signed, Rosguill talk 18:36, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mostly peaceful protest

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 18:21, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mike Strange (audio engineer)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:56, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, might be notable enough for an independent article. Delete, both to encourage article creation and due to the lack of anything useful at the current target. There's a few scattered mentions across other articles, so search results would be better. signed, Rosguill talk 18:19, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Applying machine learning at scale

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 10#Applying machine learning at scale

That ♣@†

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:48, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Not mentioned at the target, an internet search didn't turn up any relevant results. Delete unless a justification can be provided. signed, Rosguill talk 17:46, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. TV Tropes [1] claims, without a source, that the short is also titled "That ♣@†#⚡!* Bunny!". Due to technical limitations it is not possible to have that as a page title as the # is interpreted as a section link leaving just this redirect, which would make it worth keeping if verifiable. In attempting to verify it I found the short on YouTube[1] the title screen shows the first character is not ♣ but a stick of dynamite/TNT surrounded by a cloud. 🧨 (firecracker/dynamite) is probably a closer representation but this is also not found on Google. I'm also not convinced that using emoji here can be correct - the film, an American production, was released in 1991 while emoji were first introduced in Japan in 1997 and didn't become popular worldwide until the 2010s according to our article. Thryduulf (talk) 18:28, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ The spam filter will not let me link, but it's the first video hit when searching "Blooper bunny" on google, the title screen is visible at 7 seconds in.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Typhoon title errors

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 17:43, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Implausible redirects. The first redirect would be pronounced "Ty-poon" instead of "Ty-foon", and we don't have the redirect "Tyhpoon". The second redirect has two errors: The left bracket is too close the name, and there are two "1s" intead of one "1". Seventyfiveyears (talk) 16:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Untitled third Fantastic Beasts film

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:21, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary redirect from draftspace Starzoner (talk) 15:56, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Draft:Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them 3

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 21:20, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary redirect Starzoner (talk) 15:53, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Striking out vote per J947's findings. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 02:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Secularity (non-religiosity)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Secularity. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris talk! 04:47, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:XY. The DAB Secular (disambiguation), to which Secularity (disambiguation) redirects, has a section "Separate from religion" with half a dozen entries. I've gone through the articles that used this and except for the protected Joan of Arc essentially disambiguated them, often with more specific links to e.g secular state, secular education etc. This used to redirect to secularism, but I boldly changed it when listing here to target the disambiguation page. Still, it seems mildly harmful to imply that non-religious secularity is unambiguous wjhen patently it's not. It's essentially a tautology, so this does not make a good disambiguator. 94.21.78.115 (talk) 09:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'd already tagged it thus. It seems a strange thing to search for, especially when the "(disambiguation)" page already appears in the drop-down one could well expect that any other disambiguator would not be ambiguous. In a sense, incoming external links are always broken when a redirect target is changed, so that argument would prevent us ever deleting or retargeting any redirect. 94.21.78.115 (talk) 18:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I do know that. 94.21.78.115 (talk) 18:23, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:03, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Josstice League

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Zack Snyder's Justice League##ReleaseTheSnyderCut movement. signed, Rosguill talk 17:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

While this is a nickname given by some fans to the film, its not in wide use and is not mentioned in the target page. ★Trekker (talk) 03:53, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris talk! 07:02, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Arianator

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy retarget to List of fandom names. (non-admin closure) Heart (talk) 06:12, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please retarget all of them to List of fandom names as they are not mentioned in the current targets. See also the previous discussion for Swifties (fans of Taylor Swift) and for Selenator (fans of Selena Gomez. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:06, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to list the plurals. I can't add a RfD tag on Directioners because it is fully protected. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:31, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Lucky Charmes

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 17:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense redirect; artist only remixed the target single. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:11, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Shunya yamashita

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. signed, Rosguill talk 17:42, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect from a non-notable person to a company article where that person is not mentioned once. Originally it redirected to Shunya Yamashita, but was changed to redirect to Square Enix in 2011, when the former article was redirected to the latter; in 2016 that redirection was reversed (for being an "unexplained and confusing redirect"), leading the "Shunya Yamashita" page to be deleted by PROD in 2016, leaving this redirect. 「ディノ奴千？！」☎ Dinoguy1000 02:05, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2020_September_26&oldid=982759160"