Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 21

November 21

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 21, 2020.

Prostitute

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy keep. Withdrawn, giving the overwhelming consensus against, I do not think further discussion is necessary. Originally, this was also partially based on the page history of Prostitute. Perhaps I should stay away from this topic area in the future... (non-admin closure) P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 14:05, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Prostitute → Prostitution (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Retarget to Sex worker, since the term refers to the person doing the job, not the job itself. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 19:37, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the prostitution target. The lead in sex worker spends two paragraphs explaining that not all sex workers are prostitutes. Pichpich (talk) 20:22, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Pichpich. Thryduulf (talk) 20:38, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and trout the nominator. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:18, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Pichpich. --John B123 (talk) 10:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Sensical as is. Suggested target is problematic. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 02:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pencil bait

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:36, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pencil bait → Solen marginatus (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Not mentioned at the target, creator was later blocked for vandalism. Delete unless a justification can be provided. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:19, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Google tells me that pencil bait is a type of fishing bait or fishing lure (I'm not sure which), about which we seem to have no content. I can find no obvious connection to the current target. Thryduulf (talk) 20:44, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pokemon Stadium 3

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:55, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pokemon Stadium 3 → Pokémon Stadium (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

There is no Pokémon stadium 3. TheAwesome Hwyh 15:28, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete misleading redirect. Also no other title is even informally known as Pokemon Stadium 3.--65.92.160.124 (talk) 16:52, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Pokémon X•Y

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon X•Y → Pokémon X and Y (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Pokemon X・Y → Pokémon X and Y (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

This does not seem to be a spelling used for this subject. TheAwesome Hwyh 15:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: literally no one uses this term lol. – 333 -blue at 10:40, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Achievement gap

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Educational inequality. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 00:44, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Achievement gap → Achievement gaps in the United States (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
Education gap → Achievement gaps in the United States (talk · links · history · stats) [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

Per WP:INUSA, generic titles like this should not redirect to content about one specific country (these gaps are not specific to the United States). Educational inequality is a broader article but I'm not sure if that's the only one and if not whether it is the best one? See also Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 13#Racial Achievement Gap. Thryduulf (talk) 01:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both ~~per nom.~~ per WP:NOPRIMARY. UnitedStatesian (talk) 06:50, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @UnitedStatesian: my nomination is an argument for retargetting, I do not support deletion. Thryduulf (talk) 13:53, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Updated. UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:40, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Educational inequality. --Asmodea Oaktree (talk) 10:10, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per nom; WP:NOPRIMARY might relate to the "should this go to a specific country?" question, but I don't see any rationale for considering Educational inequality to not be the proper target of these general terms. I guess it is possible that "achievement gap" has broader applicability than just education, but I don't think I've ever run into it outside that context (maybe that's too IDONTKNOWIT, though; it's not a question I've researched). So, at very lest redir. Education gap to Educational inequality. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 16:01, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Merkin Vineyards and Caduceus Cellars

Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 28#Merkin Vineyards and Caduceus Cellars