Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 8

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

March 8

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 8, 2017.

Adobe distiller

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. --BDD (talk) 21:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the redirect page because it's redundant. RMAX86 (talk) 23:00, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Wikipedia:Opera basic topics

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. WJBscribe (talk) 08:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Project-to-mainspace redirects are not useful. The redirect has been here since December 2005. GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 03:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 21:58, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Small Penis Syndrome

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Human penis size. --BDD (talk) 15:32, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The target doesn't mention either "small penis" or any "syndrome", so the redir is misleading. 81.96.84.137 (talk) 09:04, 12 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 16:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 21:58, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I created a Wiktionary definition of wikt:small penis syndrome. George Ho (talk) 08:50, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Important Events of 2005

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus. --BDD (talk) 15:30, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The word "important" is subjective. Also, no other pages beginning with "Important Events" exist. Steel1943 (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • weak keep per WP:RNEUTRAL. The information sought can be found at the target. Thryduulf (talk) 15:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Additional comment from nominator: The use of the word "important" on this redirect could be seen by readers having the same problem as most redirects starting with the word "other". The reader may go to the list page without the word "important" present in its title, and in most cases (like the one of this redirect,) that page is the target of this nominated redirect. So, of the reader doesn't consider any of the items listed at the list page "important", they may look up the title with the word "important" (this redirect), and be redirected here. With this being said, this causes a similar problem as the redirects that start with the word "other", and that it ... it is unclear what the word "important" as defined in this redirect is meant to exclude. Steel1943 (talk) 16:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep per Thryduulf. ---- Patar knight - chat/contributions 20:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Deryck C. 21:58, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Dej Buh Stesti

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:29, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Similar to Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 November 18#Zwolf. WP:RFOREIGN is applicable since there's no usage of this term in English. -- Tavix (talk) 21:50, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

January 20, 2004

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was no consensus to delete. That being said, there was no objection to GeoffreyT2000's suggestion, so feel free to carry that out. -- Tavix (talk) 16:59, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Exact date not mentioned in target. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 11:07, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Very bad trip

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure about these two, so I'm bringing them here for discussion. Even though these words are in English, I am not sure if they should be deleted per WP:FORRED or not. So ... how could I be wondering whether or not these redirects qualify for WP:FORRED? Well, these titles were only used for their releases in France/French language. So, I'm not sure if that would mean that these redirect have affinity to the French language since from what I can find, these redirects are only used in conjunction with the French language. Steel1943 (talk) 17:32, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Thryduulf (talk) 11:04, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

List of restaurant chains in Bahrain

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was restore article. The nominator appears correct in arguing that Bahrain doesn't fit the main list's inclusion criteria. The restoration is indeed done without prejudice to future action, such as AfD. --BDD (talk) 21:23, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Propose to delete redirect as it's target leads to a section that doesn't exist in target article nor is there any mention of it anywhere else. Ajf773 (talk) 06:19, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Downhill (film) (2014)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Deryck C. 13:32, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The odd punctuation here makes this an unlikely search term. No incoming links. — Gorthian (talk) 05:30, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Downhill (upcoming film)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:20, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not an upcoming film any more. There were two incoming article links that I've fixed; it's ready to be deleted. — Gorthian (talk) 05:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Martin Pagel

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 15#Martin Pagel

Nerukku Ner (2015 film)

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 15#Nerukku Ner (2015 film)

Dixon Hill

edit

  Relisted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 March 15#Dixon Hill

Moana (2018 film)

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted, G7. -- Tavix (talk) 03:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is a bit of a faulty crystal ball. Moana was released in 2016, not 2018. -- Tavix (talk) 02:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, StAnselm. I'll take care of it via G7. -- Tavix (talk) 03:25, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Template:Gaelic handball by region

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:17, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The template no longer has a "by region" section as all regional articles have been deleted. -- Tavix (talk) 00:55, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Trumpcare

edit

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to American Health Care Act. There's been enough input where the result seems inevitable at this point. -- Tavix (talk) 13:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should this go to 2017 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act replacement proposals instead? - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:10, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_March_8&oldid=1088106591"