Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 October 18

October 18

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on October 18, 2013.

Two Birds

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was dabify. --BDD (talk) 17:23, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Two Birds → Two Birds (Awake) (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

This redirect currently points to an episode of a television show. However, if the television show is the primary topic, it should just be moved there. Since, as of now, there is no evidence of a primary topic, this redirect should be deleted or converted to a DAB. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} _{my edits} 20:22, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

We need a page at Two Birds and at two birds, for people who, when looking for an article, type in the plain name without disambiguater. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:35, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Disambiguate - I have provided a mock-up on the page. The Whispering Wind (talk) 21:03, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Frankenstein (2014 film)

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:20, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Frankenstein (2014 film) → Paul McGuigan (filmmaker) (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

This is a redirect of a future film that does not have a title yet BOVINEBOY2008 10:50, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Has been referred to as "Frankenstein" by the media several times,[1] [2] [3] so is a likely search term. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} _{my edits} 17:11, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- "Frankenstein" may be a likely search term, but is "Frankenstein (2014 film)"? The film does not even have a confirmed release date. BOVINEBOY2008 22:27, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The 2014 date seems to have been pulled out of the air (the same source, it would seem, now being used for a 2015 date in the target article). It is highly unlikely that anyone would search for "Frankenstein (2014 film)" for an untitled film with no projected release date. The note at Frankenstein (disambiguation) is sufficient. - SummerPhD (talk) 16:03, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per SummerPhD. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} _{my edits} 17:11, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Internet commentator

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 17:19, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Internet commentator → 50 Cent Party (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

I nominate the redirect for deletion on behalf of 97.116.186.162 (talk · contribs), who complained about the redirect at the talk page. The rationale for deletion is (copied from the talk page): Internet commentator IS NOT the same as 50 Cent Party. This is totally a misleading indirect. 50 Cent Party is simply just an example of an internet commentator. There are many other internet commentator organizations in many other countries in the world. This indirect is narrow-minded with no worldwide view point. There are currently two solutions to this "internet commentator" article. Either someone is going to create an article that actually expresses what is an "internet commentator" with the worldwide view point (meaning it must not solely talking about internet commentator in China) or delete it for now and wait for someone else to do it in the future. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 06:22, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I agree with the IP, the meaning of the term "Internet commentator" is too broad to be linked with a single pro-state organization. I won't object if anyone wants to create an article in a broader sense of that term, however, the current state is incorrect and misleading. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 06:22, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Nittany

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was dabify. --BDD (talk) 19:11, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nittany → Nittany Lion (links to redirect • history • stats) [ Closure: keep/delete ]

I would like to see this retargeted as the main disambiguation page for all pages related to Nittany. As it currently stands, it's just a redirect to the mascot, while there [there are a dozen things that have the same or similar name] and require a disambiguation page (and none currently exist for any entries). As most people refer to the Nittany Lion rather than just Nittany, this means the name does not have primacy in familiarity, thus I propose that this entry be retargeted as the main disambiguation page. ip.address.conflict (talk) 03:38, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguate per nom. Feel free to go ahead and do it, you don't need to wait until the discussion is closed because no deletion is involved. Siuenti (talk) 08:02, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.