Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 January 22

< Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion | Log

January 22

edit

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 22, 2013

James Knowles (footballer)

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:56, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete- not mentioned in target article as he's no longer at Blackburn[1]; I would suggest updating redirect but redirects such as this are unlikely to be stable as the mention in the article is only current, not permanent. The reason for protection, "Multiple AFD's, perhaps this may be notable in the future", no longer applies - actually it probably never did as the first two AFDs appear to be for a different footballer, born 1983 not 1993. Peter James (talk) 23:47, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

4815162342 (number)

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. Plausible search term, in line with WP formatting.] Nabla (talk) 23:04, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not mentioned in the target, and not likely to be typed correctly. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:00, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Digi Sport

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep (non-admin closure). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:04, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect causing a loop as Digi TV links again to Digi Sport The Banner talk 13:14, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

''All My Babies' Mamas''

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete. Ruslik_Zero 18:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DB-TEST speedy delete. Weird attempt at italicizing a title, by making up a title not used by the subject. The page move was reverted, leaving this redirect behind. 76.65.128.43 (talk) 04:09, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Digi Sport 3

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep ([{WP:NAC Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:06, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is creating a loop as it is pointing to Digi TV, what links to Digi Sport 3 The Banner talk 01:27, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Digi Sport 2

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep (non-admin closure). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:09, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is creating a loop as it is pointing to Digi TV, what links to Digi Sport 2 The Banner talk 01:26, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Digi Sport 1

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep (non-admin closure). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:10, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect is creating a loop as it is pointing to Digi TV, what links to Digi Sport 1 The Banner talk 01:26, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

Mannam Volunteer Association

edit
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman 16:56, 18 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think that correlation must remove speedy. MANNAM is a volunteer association and Shinchonji is a religious organization. They are different organizations. Lightinme (talk) 14:06, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete. Like any other sponsors,Shinchonji supports MANNAM Volunteer Association.MANNAM is an independent organization from any others. I heard that there is contraversy over Shinchonji,but it's nothing to do with MANNAM.MANNAM and Shinchonji co-host several big events and just because that fact,it is hard to be considered that MANNAM is Shinchonji.Konzaburo (talk)
  • Delete. According to my understanding, MANNAM as a purely international society Volunteer Association, Representative NamHee Kim has made a lot of activities to strengthen exchanges, she is aimed at promoting the world peace. But MANNAM Jointly organized Sports Exhibition with Shinchonji[2], and some people say that MANNAM and Shinchonji is together or they are one, I feel too far-fetched. As for ManHee Lee is the honorary president of the MANNAM, it is not surprising. Because Shinchonji supports MANNAM, so this is quite normal, and he also advocated for World Peace. Simply because of Shinchonji, and says that MANNAM is belongs to religious groups. I am very puzzled about it. I just hope MANNAM as a Volunteer Association can better serve the community, and it dosen’t being attacked by someone, because of a religious group as Shinchonji.Joodongzhe (talk) 15:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep-These redirects were just kept by consensus less than a month ago: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2012 December 20#Mannam Volunteer Association. I'd also note that the nominator and both users advocating "delete" appear to be WP:SPAs, and may well be WP:SOCKs.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 22:50, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I re-uploaded this because there were opinions in similar proportion. At that time, outcome was same point, 2-2. So I think it will be needed to check again. User:Junganghansik made Mannam-Shinchonji redirections, but I noticed that Junganghansik also edited same categories lately. I don't think he is not WP:SPA. If I'm not a sock puppet, you will be responsible for the result. Lightinme (talk) 03:11, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Don't say that just because I'm a newcomer. If you think my opinion is wrong, you should give your reasons. Don't bite the newcomer. Konzaburo (talk) 23:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
If you disagree with the result of a deletion discussion, you should follow the procedures outlined at Wikipedia: Deletion review. Just creating a new nomination without going through that process is generally considered disruptive.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 21:37, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think Deletion Review is for disputed deletions and speedy deletions, not for renomination. A previous request ended in a tie, 2 to 2 and there weren't enough comment to make a dicision. Consequently I renominated this and you doubted me, User:Konzaburo and User:joodongzhe as sock puppets. But Checkuser concluded that three users are different people. Would you please assume newcomers with good faith? I don't know why you are accusing me of bad faith. I think the others mimicked my spelling of MANNAM. I ask you to be polite to newcomers. Lightinme (talk) 04:24, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your understanding of deletion review is incorrect. You are saying that as it was a "tie". As the template you removed (and I have readded) explains, deletion discussions are not votes. The closer determined that the consensus was to keep. If you feel that was incorrect, you can ask that it be reviewed. You should not, however, just make a "do-over" nomination. That's just not the proper way to do things.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 15:18, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete According to previous discussion, the person who redirect this document, insisted that they have same Chairman, but this is not true. As far as I know there is no Chairman in Mannam, Man-Hee Lee is just Honorary chairman. Actually Representative(Chairwoman) of Mannam is Nam Hee Kim. Even though it is true that he is working with Nam Hee Kim, but I couldn't find any evidence that Mannam is Shinchonji. Wglsa (talk) 06:39, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2013_January_22&oldid=1141906360"