Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 June 2

< June 1	June 3 >

June 2

File:Sami al-Oraydi.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep as properly tagged non-free file. —Darkwind (talk) 10:57, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sami al-Oraydi.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

No evidence of public domain as claim. Eeekster (talk) 09:01, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sonal-Vengurlekar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Darkwind (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sonal-Vengurlekar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image is a crop of one posted on instagram back in march (see here). Peripitus (Talk) 11:33, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SonalVengurlekar190620132212.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Darkwind (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:04, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:SonalVengurlekar190620132212.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Given the type of photo and the fact it is cropped...I suspect that this photo either came from her instagram feed or her facebook page. Peripitus (Talk) 11:41, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FWIII (1).jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Photographs that are faithful reproductions of a public domain 2D artwork are not eligible for copyright in the US. See Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag. —Darkwind (talk) 11:05, 16 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:FWIII (1).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Source claim is most likely false. Painting might be PD but the photo of it is probably not. http://www.fotoseimagenes.net/federico-guillermo-iii-de-prusia Eeekster (talk) 22:29, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.