Contents
June 26
edit
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you feel it is non-free. AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Uranus2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The original upload cites [1] as the source, *not* the public domain NASA image currently listed. (This image is higher resolution than the NASA image cited as the source: further processing has clearly been done by someone, which immediately negates the claim that it is a NASA public domain image.) That site in turn lists [2] as its source, which has an explicitly non-free copyright policy stated at [3] and [4]. Steuard (talk) 03:20, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Stalinblankb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- It is an award certificate by a private organization in Russia, so I am not sure how this can even be public domain. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 03:30, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rent 2012 Greek Cast.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This looks like a promotional image for the show 'RENT' , whilst it may be a user photo, the underlying work is not free Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:57, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- What underlying work? The photo of the city? I don't see anything else; if this was truly a user photo which was licensed, I think it would be OK. But I think the same image appears on the Rent musical facebook page,[5] so it's probably just a copy taken off the internet, and should be deleted. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: marked non-free per the Commons discussion. Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:20, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Audubon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- A derivative work of a logo created circa 2003 and deleted on Commons per Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Audubon Parkway sign.jpg. So this have to go or to be changed to fair use. MGA73 (talk) 13:15, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fad0139.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- User has a history of claiming to be copyright owner of other people's photographs. This particular photograph was originally http://www.webhogsclub.com/gallery/original_whrc/fad2001/fad0139.jpg at whrc/fad2001/. It was mentioned in the User talk:Cardsplayer4life/Archive 1#Image:BobbyPetrino.jpg and Image:Peter Cullen BotCon.jpg Mosmof (talk) 14:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Amy Serrano Picture.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The provided reason why this is PD is "Its a universally used picture of her...". I do not think that it is a valid reason to verify that it is PD. MGA73 (talk) 15:19, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete - Cropped version from http://blogs.westword.com/latestword/2008/03/index.php?page=8 - © 2012 Denver Westword, LLC. All rights reserved. Ronhjones (Talk) 22:02, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:17, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Betcee May.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The provided reason why the file is PD is "Fotografía de Dominio Público". I do not think that the reason is enough to verify that it is PD. MGA73 (talk) 15:21, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:54, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The provided reason for this to be PD is "official item legally exempt from copyright in its country of origin". However, the source is the Florida State Parks under the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. So is not a part of the national government and the PD-US-Gov licenses.We have Template:PD-FLGov and Commons:Template:PD-FLGov but I do not think that this photo falls natually under the text in the templates. MGA73 (talk) 15:30, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not PD-USGov, but I don't see why that would not fall under PD-FLGov; that covers basically all works created by the state, unless they do not qualify as a public record, or if the state legislature has legislated an exception granting a particular body to copyright their work. As of 2006, per this report, the Department of State, projects of the Florida Space Authority, Department of the Lottery, the Department of Transportation, the Department of Citrus, water management districts, and the Florida Institute of Phosphate Research are allowed to copyright their works, as well as instructional materials and ancillary written documents across the government, and (I think as a result of the linked paper) perhaps software in general. It's possible that additional exceptions have been legislated since then, but we'd have to see that the state parks or Department of Environmental Protection was given the ability. The scope of public records is very broad; it would cover most things except records which might violate personal privacy, or classified information, or some things like that. Pretty similar to PD-USGov in that regard. The statue itself would not be PD-FLGov (not created by the government), but it would appear to be PD-US-no_notice.[6] Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:39, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:16, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lab Rats Logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- This does not look like {{PD-text}} because of the way the letters are decorated. Also see Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lab Rats Logo.png. MGA73 (talk) 20:44, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep but poster removed (it is File:Metropolisposter.jpg). Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:06, 29 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Win-kexi-commercial.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Clearly a screenshot Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:08, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Kexi is a piece of FOSS software. --RaviC (talk) 21:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you provide a link confirming that? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:14, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, Kexi. The Metropolis poster on the other hand.... Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:53, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- We can crop out the poster from the image. --RaviC (talk) 20:57, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, Kexi. The Metropolis poster on the other hand.... Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:53, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you provide a link confirming that? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:14, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.