Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2011 March 23

< March 22	March 24 >

March 23

File:Rao_tila_ram.jpg

All philatelic material is under Government of India Copyright vide Indian Copyright Act 1957 and only comes into public domain after 50 years of date of issue. AshLin (talk) 05:39, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is his picture i have been seeing since childhood in newspapers, political rallies, Govt buildings and statues. i donoo what to do now so it it remains on wikipedia? please tell me the procedure what if i manually take a picture from my digital camera? , how then i upload it , cause it,s very complicated to upload any picture on wiki.

This is the image of a postage stamp. You cant upload the postage stamp image of Rao Tula Ram on Wikipedia till 50 years after issue. You can try to find his image in a publication more than 60 years ago. That will be out of copyright if the photographer is unknown. AshLin (talk) 13:37, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think it is more complicated than that. There is no explicit copyright release provision in the Indian Copyright Act for legal token/tender. In most other countries, "low resolution" images of stamps, currency, coins are usable but such as statement does not exist in the Indian Copyright Act. It would be 60 years after the publication in the case of Government work. You could argue under fair use in some cases but surely you can look for an image of the man elsewhere rather than on postage stamps. Shyamal (talk) 04:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SSU3.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:SSU3.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Logo for Salem State University, Obviously not user-authored B (talk) 16:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Salemstatelogo.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salemstatelogo.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Logo for Salem State University, obviously not a work of the federal government B (talk) 16:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:BrieryCreekPressLogo.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by RL0919 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:BrieryCreekPressLogo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

It appears to be the logo of some organization, but it is claimed to be free in the description. Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:42, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: The file was renamed after posting here, so AnomieBot auto-closed it. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:04, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Zuniga at the Hirshhorn.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:04, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zuniga at the Hirshhorn.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

A photograph of an artwork that is still in copyright, in the U.S., becomes a derivative work and remains subject to the artist's copyright. An earlier image of a different Zuniga sculpture was already removed from commons for the same reason. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:58, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

i added a rationale, now in strict accordance with non-free 3D. Slowking4 (talk) 14:51, 24 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.