June 19
edit
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ipodinpackage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Unauthorised derivative work of Apple iPod shuffle and packaging, orphaned. Acather96 (talk) 07:10, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The only copyrighted portion appears to be the Apple logo, and that's not a central part of the photograph. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 21:38, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Block.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).
- While I can't find the exact file online, at this resolution it seems much more likely to be taken from a website than to be a personal creation. Can the author please produce the original resolution version? Muhandes (talk) 07:19, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fe5AXRsf.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Appears to be a screenshot of Live at the Apollo (TV series). January (talk) 11:19, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:02, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wikieyec.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No fair use rationale would be possible for this image of a living person. A verifiable release via OTRS would be needed. Fæ (talk) 13:39, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete clear {{db-f4}} case (no source/no license), so tagged as such. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 21:46, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Globe-j-pop.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Copyvio uploader, not the uploaders work but video screenshot or grabbed from the internet. Martin H. (talk) 16:10, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep.-FASTILY (TALK) 00:11, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Facebook-logo234.png (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No evidence that source website has permission to release copyrighted facebook logo as cc-by-sa-3.0 MilborneOne (talk) 20:20, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- {{pd-textlogo}}, but redundant to File:Facebook icon.jpg. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 21:45, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems like a better version actually, with transparency.--Muhandes (talk) 11:06, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep.-FASTILY (TALK) 00:12, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dell-logo 1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- no evidence that the uploader or source website has permission to release copyrighted dell logo as cc-by-sa-3.0 MilborneOne (talk) 20:22, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Perfectly fine per {{pd-textlogo}} but essentially redundant to File:Dell Logo.svg, etc. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 21:44, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Fetchcomms (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ayman Al-Zawahiri.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- No source given SpeakFree (talk) 21:33, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:08, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Evga.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Graphics on packaging are not free; de minimis does not apply as the box is the main focus of the photograph. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 21:36, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Fetchcomms (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Gps Thing.Jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- The hand and "GPS Thing" are photoshopped over an image of a forest. There is a partially-obscured URL at the bottom right, which leads me to believe that the image of the forest is copyrighted. – GorillaWarfare talk • contribs 23:52, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The website is probably and almost certainly some non-major website and its a picture of a forrest which they only took a picture of, they didn't actually create it, and the reason i put that up was cuz it wuz friggin hiLarias and to represent confusion and malfunction and stuffs — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boberson33 (talk • contribs) 01:37, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No, they didn't create the forest. They did, however, create the photo. Thus, it is copyrighted. Copyright law protects even "non-major website(s)", whether your use of it is "friggin hiLarias" or not. - SummerPhD 02:42, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete - Blatant copyright violation. - SummerPhD 02:42, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
No, they used a camera, took the picture, and uploaded it!! Dats like sayin onion's created bad breath. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boberson33 (talk • contribs) 02:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Your opinion -- that photographs are not copyrighted -- is incorrect. Please review [[Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright#What_is_copyright.3F]: "Copyright is the right that the producer of a creative work has been granted to prevent others from copying it. Unlike a patent, however, in most places (i.e., countries) you don't have to apply for a copyright – you get one automatically every time you produce creative work. A creative work can be almost anything – a book, a song, a picture, a photograph, a poem, a phrase, or a fictional character." Thanks. - SummerPhD 03:01, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete No permission, {{db-f11}}. Boberson33, it might help if you actually learn a little about U.S. copyright law before commenting here. (Dat's how da lawz work, copywrites so friggin hilareous rite?) Or standard written English, whichever makes you look slightly more convincing. /ƒETCHCOMMS/ 02:57, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Eh, fine delete it, but im not saying photographs are uncopyrighted, i be sayin dat 1 isnt copyrighted so stawp dat crap before i say somethin that i have to be blocked or somethin, we cool BRO!!! I dont want no trouble, thanks, and i would type those squiqlies but they dont show them and i dont have them on my keebordz — Preceding unsigned comment added by Boberson33 (talk • contribs) 03:52, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.