Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 6

< March 5	March 7 >

March 6

File:Daisy dancing2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Daisy dancing2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

I somehow doubt that the uploader is Eduardo Vernazza and is then prepared to license his art with a CC3.0 license. Fred the Oyster (talk) 02:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Marcel Marceau by Eduardo Vernazza2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marcel Marceau by Eduardo Vernazza2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

I somehow doubt that the uploader is Eduardo Vernazza and is then prepared to license his art with a CC3.0 license. Fred the Oyster (talk) 03:00, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Theater by eduardo vernazza2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Theater by eduardo vernazza2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

I somehow doubt that the uploader is Eduardo Vernazza and is then prepared to license his art with a CC3.0 license. Fred the Oyster (talk) 03:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Candombes by eduardo vernazza2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Candombes by eduardo vernazza2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

I somehow doubt that the uploader is Eduardo Vernazza and is then prepared to license his art with a CC3.0 license. Fred the Oyster (talk) 03:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Eduardo1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eduardo1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder as claimed. Eeekster (talk) 04:41, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Eduardovernazza2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eduardovernazza2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

No evidence that the upload is the copyright holder as claimed. Eeekster (talk) 04:42, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ballet1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ballet1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

I somehow doubt that the uploader is Eduardo Vernazza and is then prepared to license his art with a CC3.0 license. Eeekster (talk) 04:43, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ritmos elves.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ritmos elves.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

I somehow doubt that the uploader is Eduardo Vernazza and is then prepared to license his art with a CC3.0 license. Eeekster (talk) 04:43, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Peruvian dancers.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peruvian dancers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

I somehow doubt that the uploader is Eduardo Vernazza and is then prepared to license his art with a CC3.0 license. Eeekster (talk) 04:44, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rythms by vernazza.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:43, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rythms by vernazza.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

I somehow doubt that the uploader is Eduardo Vernazza and is then prepared to license his art with a CC3.0 license. Eeekster (talk) 04:44, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Work.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Work.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Definitely not self-made as claimed, Animation Factory is a division of Getty Images, so likely not allowed to be used freely here on Wikipedia. The Evil IP address (talk) 09:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This file comes from animationfactory, which is a commercial site and charges fees for access to its material. Its terms of use at http://www.animationfactory.com/en/company/terms.html says, among other things, that the site content is "protected by copyright, trade dress, moral rights, trademark and other laws relating to the protection of intellectual property". Nowhere on that page or anywhere else on the company's site can I find anything that remotely suggests that the material is made available for free use. This is one of a string of files from the same source uploaded by the same user, and in all cases the copyright claim made by that user is clearly completely unfounded. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Arcade Machine.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arcade Machine.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Animation Factory, same as above on File:Work.gif. The Evil IP address (talk) 09:21, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, same as File:Work.gif. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:53, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Unwell.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Unwell.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Animation Factory, same as above on File:Work.gif. The Evil IP address (talk) 09:22, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, same as File:Work.gif. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:53, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Boxout.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boxout.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Animation Factory, same as above on File:Work.gif. The Evil IP address (talk) 09:22, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, same as File:Work.gif. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:53, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Boxin.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Boxin.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Animation Factory, same as above on File:Work.gif. The Evil IP address (talk) 09:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, same as File:Work.gif. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:52, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jason Merrells.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jason Merrells.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image grabbed from the Internet, Source says "All Rights Reserved". The Evil IP address (talk) 09:25, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, same uploader as File:Work.gif and other files listed above. The claim to be the copyright holder is totally implausible. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:00, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Smashing Computer GIF.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Smashing Computer GIF.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Animation Factory, same as above on File:Work.gif. The Evil IP address (talk) 09:27, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, same as File:Work.gif. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:55, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Palash.JPG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palash.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

This file has no attribution or copyright information. It appears to be a scan from an atlas of some sort, but there is no evidence to state whether this is in the public domain or not and whether the user has obtained permission to place it in Wikipedia Fiddle Faddle (talk) 09:27, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Computer Checking.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Computer Checking.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

Animation Factory, same as above on File:Work.gif The Evil IP address (talk) 09:28, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, same as File:Work.gif. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ruminant feed type classification.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Nyttend (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruminant feed type classification.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

There is no indication given of where these animal images came from. I asked the image creator, but they did not respond. Fences&Windows 15:36, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

dear all. all images was derived from internet and was modified to entire picture.

i thought that i have permission to use images after modification. i strongly apologise everyone for my unintentionally illegal effort. no excuses. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ariya shookh (talk • contribs) 17:55, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Grecanic language distribution.PNG

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grecanic language distribution.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs).

Screenshot of a Google maps image. Uploader is claiming it's their own work and has issued a CC3.0 licence on it, in spite of the fact that the image is clearly watermarked with Google's copyright. Fred the Oyster (talk) 15:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
To claim that this is one's own work is absurd. It is clearly from Google maps. It even has a Google copyright notice on it (at the bottom, towards the right hand side). The uploader, in an edit summary, says "I created this work entirely by myself, using google maps". JamesBWatson (talk) 16:12, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gangjeong Weir.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gangjeong Weir.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This looks like a promotional image and is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Fred the Oyster (talk) 16:14, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Geum River- After.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Geum River- After.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

This looks like a promotional image and is unlikely to be the uploader's own work, let alone their generosity in bequeathing it to the public domain. Fred the Oyster (talk) 16:15, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Buyeo Weir.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Buyeo Weir.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Looks like a promotional image and is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Fred the Oyster (talk) 16:17, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Han River-After.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Han River-After.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Looks like a promotional image and is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Especially given that this looks like a satellite derived image. Fred the Oyster (talk) 16:18, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Nakdong River-Before.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nakdong River-Before.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Aerial photo taken from a helicopter. Given the uploader's other uploads I also suspect this to be a non-free image that isn't their own work. Fred the Oyster (talk) 16:23, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Han River-Before.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Han River-Before.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Looks like a promotional image and is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Fred the Oyster (talk) 16:24, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Satguru Brahm Sagar Ji Maharaj Bhuriwale.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Satguru Brahm Sagar Ji Maharaj Bhuriwale.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

image is used only by deleted page Satguru Brahm Sagar Ji Maharaj (Bhuriwale) Amsaim (talk) 17:50, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Cosan.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cosan.gif (delete | talk | history | logs).

User:Edson Rosa says he created the image and releases it to public domain. However, this image is very similar to the logo used e.g. here. Compare Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 5#File:Novo-logo-mrv.jpg. Cnilep (talk) 18:37, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CPFLEnergiaBrand2010.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:CPFLEnergiaBrand2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

User:Edson Rosa says he created the image and releases it to public domain. However, this image is very similar to the logo used e.g. here. I tagged five similarly problematic images uploaded by this user. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 5#File:Novo-logo-mrv.jpg and Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 6#File:Cosan.gif. Cnilep (talk) 18:42, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Text simple lines = {{pd-textlogo}} and {{trademark}}. — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:08, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image restored and fixed per User_talk:After_Midnight#Unexplained_deletions — BQZip01 — ^talk 17:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gafisalb.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gafisalb.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

User:Edson Rosa says he created the image and releases it to public domain. However, this image is very similar to the logo used e.g. here. I have tagged six similarly problematic images uploaded by this user. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 5#File:Novo-logo-mrv.jpg and Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 6#File:Cosan.gif. Cnilep (talk) 18:43, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Apply a {{PD-textlogo}} and {{trademark}} and call it a day. This image is nothing by text. — BQZip01 — ^talk 11:30, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. It also contains that triangle-spiral image. I don't know if this is PD-text, though it might be fair use of a {{non-free logo}}. Cnilep (talk) 14:17, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - That "triangle spiral" is a "G" and is, therefore, text. I'm not saying there isn't some creativity, but font creativity itself is not protected by copyright law, so the "non-free logo" tag doesn't apply. — BQZip01 — ^talk 19:20, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - I don't see that as a G, but given that the company's name is spelled with a G, that's certainly an argument you might win. In that case, I guess the logo would be non-copyrightable as calligraphy in the US, right? What about in Brazil, where the company is located? Does that matter, given the location of Wikimedia servers? And by the way, thanks for your patience with my questions. Cnilep (talk) 16:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      - The location of the company is irrelevant as the U.S. won't recognize or respect copyright on said logo. It will recognize their trademark rights. — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Image restored and fixed per User_talk:After_Midnight#Unexplained_deletions — BQZip01 — ^talk 17:56, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eletrobrasbrand2010.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by After Midnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:22, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eletrobrasbrand2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

User:Edson Rosa says he created the image. However, this image is very similar to the logo used e.g. here. I have tagged several similarly problematic images uploaded by this user. See Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 5#File:Novo-logo-mrv.jpg and Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2010 March 6#File:Cosan.gif. Cnilep (talk) 18:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep retag and add a FUR. — BQZip01 — ^talk 07:09, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:The.Dublin.Magazine.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 17:45, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:The.Dublin.Magazine.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

Image of a page from The Dublin Magazine from 1937 and is therefore still within copyright. User has issued a Creative Commons license. Fred the Oyster (talk) 19:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep magazine cover image is now being used under a fair-use claim in an article about the magazine. ww2censor (talk) 02:38, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Paradigm Corporation Emblem.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 17:42, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paradigm Corporation Emblem.png (delete | talk | history | logs).

This image is derived from the anime series Big O and would fall under the copyright ownership of the series' producers and/or creators. As such, it cannot be claimed as an "original work" by another party and uploaded under a Creative Commons license. —Farix (t | c) 23:16, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The series is copyrighted, but an independent illustration of a significant plot mover from it for non-commercial purposes ought to be covered by fair use, and indeed is elswhere on WP: see for example File:Galactic_Empire_logo.svg, among many others. I'll change the copyright to non-free, with appropriate media use rationale. Senix (talk) 23:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.