April 4
edit
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Tnxman307 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:30, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bburkepostcard.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- File indicates this was taken before 1923, however there's no source information which is needed for confirmation. Thirdship (talk) 01:17, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Lacks source info given, to determine the publication date or where the postcard was produced. Thus unverified PD-US tag should be wrong. ––Braghis (talk) 04:17, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Available on commons, however, just because the source doesn't explicitly say the date of the image, that doesn't mean the tag is wrong. — BQZip01 — talk 22:30, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Keep, tagged non-free. After Midnight 0001 14:00, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Nigel Lawson BW.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- "theoretically replaceable by a free image, as Lawson is still alive." fetchcomms☛ 02:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC) fetchcomms☛ 02:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Lawson is still alive, so a free photograph of him could be taken, but good luck finding him and photographing him - no-one else seems to have managed. The infringement of BBC copyright is minimal: a single screenshoot from an hour-long documentary. (Although the BBC does hold copyright, it is of course a public service broadcaster.) I am pretty sure that this image passes the fair use criteria, and wikipedia really does need an image of Lawson. BartBassist (talk) 02:29, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Alive=Replaceable=delete (unless he is known for looking that way, in which case critical commentary needs to be present reflecting that information. — BQZip01 — talk 22:32, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- What do you mean by "known for looking that way"? The photograph shows what Lawson looked like - Lawson was "known for looking" like he does here, holding a typical quizzical pose. His rotund features earned some degree of renown - he subsequently lost a lot of weight and wrote a book on dieting. BartBassist (talk) 00:33, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT⚡ 03:30, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Collage rossi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Tagged {{GFDL-self-with-disclaimers}}, but this is probably a collage of images found on the Internet. The rightmost image can be found at [1], where it is credited to "hamhaberst". I would bet that with enough searching and luck the other images could be found online too. —Bkell (talk) 04:57, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Posterdasavatharam.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).
- Derivative of a copyrighted work, a film poster –– Jezhotwells (talk) 15:52, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Copyrighted image of a living individual=delete. — BQZip01 — talk 22:33, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.