Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 July 21

< July 20	July 22 >

July 21

File:HSS Stena Voyager.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Runningonbrains (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is copyrighted to an individual, uploader appears to be claiming to be more than one person, given the different names on the images they've uploaded. Polly (Parrot) 02:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HSS Voyager.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Runningonbrains (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is copyrighted to an individual, uploader appears to be claiming to be more than one person, given the different names on the images they've uploaded. Polly (Parrot) 02:12, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HSS Stena Carisma.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is copyrighted to an individual, uploader appears to be claiming to be more than one person, given the different names on the images they've uploaded. Polly (Parrot) 02:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HSS Stena Explorer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Runningonbrains (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is copyrighted to an individual, uploader appears to be claiming to be more than one person, given the different names on the images they've uploaded. Polly (Parrot) 02:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HSS Discovery in Belfast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Runningonbrains (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is copyrighted to an individual, uploader appears to be claiming to be more than one person, given the different names on the images they've uploaded. Polly (Parrot) 02:18, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Stena Line Holland Route.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image likely sourced from a website given its size and all this other uploaders copyvios. Polly (Parrot) 02:20, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Stena Line's Irish Routes.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image likely sourced from a website given its size and the uploaders other numerous copyvios. Polly (Parrot) 02:22, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:GerardoTorrado.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image source is a commercial copyrighted website, no indication the uploaders holds the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 02:28, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CarlosEsquivel.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image source is a commercial copyrighted website, no indication the uploaders holds the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 02:28, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CarlosVela.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F1 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image source is a commercial copyrighted website, no indication the uploaders holds the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 02:29, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:JesusCorona.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image source is a commercial copyrighted website, no indication the uploaders holds the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 02:29, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:MemoOchoa.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Infrogmation (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image source is a commercial copyrighted website, no indication the uploaders holds the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 02:30, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:GioDosSantos.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Infrogmation (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:04, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image source is a commercial copyrighted website, no indication the uploaders holds the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 02:30, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Egoodpasture2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image clearly sourced from google images as the uploader has helpfully listed. Polly (Parrot) 02:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Georgehwhipple.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image clearly sourced from Google Images as the uploader has helpful listed in the other versions section Polly (Parrot) 02:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Williammiddleton2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image clearly sourced from Google Images as the uploader has helpful listed in the other versions section. Polly (Parrot) 02:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kbrinkhous3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image clearly sourced from Google Images as the uploader has helpful listed in the other versions section Polly (Parrot) 02:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Benirschke3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image clearly sourced from Google Images as the uploader has helpful listed in the other versions section. Polly (Parrot) 02:39, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Apstout2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image likely sourced from Google, no evidence uploader hold copyright. Polly (Parrot) 02:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:ProfParkerIntCongressDentMaxfacRadiology.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Previously deleted as "used with permission"; likely that uploader is just choosing the tag that looks like it won't result in the image being deleted rather than reflecting actual licensing. Stifle (talk) 08:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:TheGrassRoots1969.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This image was previously deleted for having a bad fair use rationale; now the uploader has reuploaded it stating he created it himself. Seems implausible. Stifle (talk) 08:52, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket received under OTRS:3380609, further details requested. Stifle (talk) 15:17, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:BTQ7 1959-60.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corporate logo. I doubt this is PD. J Milburn (talk) 13:20, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not in the public domain ({{PD-self}} is not valid as the rights are held by the Ten Network) as the logo was published after 1955 (See: {{PD-Australia}}) Bidgee (talk) 08:47, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:1970s decade portrait.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Collage of images, but not all are free, so the collage isn't either. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:10, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. One non-free image taints the whole thing. Stifle (talk) 11:34, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:1940s decade portrait.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A collage of images, some of which are non-free, therefore this collage must also be. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, one non-free image taints the whole thing. Stifle (talk) 11:34, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:1960s decade portrait.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Collage of images, some are nonfree, so this is too. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Pity about the Campbell's Soup; that's the only image there that's tainting the rest. The others could all be used as CC-BY-SA-3.0. Stifle (talk) 11:35, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:1950s decade portrait.png

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by NuclearWarfare (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Collage of images; some are nonfree, so this must also be. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:15, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; the non-free image File:LucyEthel I Love Lucy.png taints the rest and makes the whole thing unusable. Stifle (talk) 11:36, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Prime 1988.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; for now-FASTILY ^(TALK) 01:38, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Corporate logo, unused. I doubt this is PD. J Milburn (talk) 15:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is too simple for copyright, per {{PD-textlogo}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 13:23, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per IronGargoyle. Bidgee (talk) 08:49, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Raymonsteedboy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept as now tagged fair use. Stifle (talk) 11:12, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Expired Crown Copyright asserted, but it's not clear that this was ever a work of the UK government. It also asserts fair use as well as public domain. Same image previously discussed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 June 24#File:44027993 raymond other 300.jpg. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was not informed of the first Possibly Unfree Files discussion and merely re-uploaded this picture when I realised it had gone. Now, I'm no expert on copyright tags and it is possible I have picked the wrong ones but, as I understand it, the picture was issued by the victim's family via the British Government following his death in 1943. The UK Office of Public Sector Information, formerly HMSO, states: "Crown copyright protection in published material lasts for fifty years from the end of the year in which the material was first published. Therefore material published [fifty-one years ago], and any Crown copyright material published before that date, would now be out of copyright, and may be freely reproduced throughout the world." Additionally, as the photo was taken of the victim as a young child, it means the picture is 70 years old or more - making it out of British copyright.[1] I also believe there is an arguement for fair use if the above two explanations fail to meet approval. I have used an official Wikipedia template for this on the upload page, which states: "This image is a faithful digitisation of a unique historic image, and the copyright for it is most likely held by the person who created the image or the agency employing the person. It is believed that the use of this image may qualify as fair use under United States copyright law." I have also included a link to the picture on a BBC website, but the picture is not exclusive to them.--Beehold (talk) 21:26, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright template used suggests it was created by the UK government, however if it was originally issued by his family, it is likely that a member of the family would own the copyright (unless you have any information that suggests the copyright was transferred when the picture was issued). Although it is possible that the authorship of the picture is unknown, which would make the copyright expire after 70 years, it is still unclear whether it would be out of copyright. The date of the photograph – "circa. 1937-1939" according to the article – is possibly less than 70 years ago, and if it was not published until 1943, it will probably be copyrighted until the end of 2013. I agree that it would probably qualify for fair use, but the summary section probably needs some corrections and a fair use rationale is needed. snigbrook (talk) 22:35, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with {{dfu}} or list it at WP:Non-free content review. Otherwise, unless there is another reason for listing here, the listing will be closed by an administrator and the image kept. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:13, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As I stated above, I'm not very clued up on which templates to use. If anyone can suggest the correct one, I would be enormously grateful.--Beehold (talk) 11:17, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I have changed the fair use rationale to hopefully something more acceptable.-- Myosotis Scorpioides 18:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mac Font List.pdf

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Vector representation of fonts. See {{PD-font}}. Cybercobra (talk) 16:53, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:HSS Stena Discovery's last voyage.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Runningonbrains (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is copyrighted to an individual, uploader appears to be claiming to be more than one person, given the different names on the images they've uploaded. Polly (Parrot) 18:34, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Gladyscarrion.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:09, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Official portrait of a politician, no evidence the uploader holds the copyright. Polly (Parrot) 19:13, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rui Huang by Steve Vaccariello.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image likely sourced from a website:Small size and no metadata. Polly (Parrot) 19:14, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ben Pelchat Solo Shot1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Album cover artwork, uploader unlikely to hold copyright. Polly (Parrot) 19:34, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Eliza Wren Trolley.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional image, no evidence the uploader holds copyright. Polly (Parrot) 20:16, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Main_logolab_logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F4 by Killiondude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Logo - NO indication uploader is trademark holder. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:50, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is too simple for copyright. Trademark is not relevant here--only copyright. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:59, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Outside_original_hamilton.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Skeptical of self claim - Looks like archive image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:54, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: more likely this is an uploader with a WP:COI who has access to the company archive based on his Hamiltonshirts username and edits. Maybe we will be lucky and he arranges to freely licence the image from the company to enhance the article Hamilton Shirts. ww2censor (talk) 22:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Lorenda Starfet.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Very low resolution, no metadata. Tineye finds similar photos but all are lower resolution. This uploader has other copyright violations uploaded from web sources, but I cannot find an original for this one. (ESkog)^(Talk) 22:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Let's get crazy performed live.jpg

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:34, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The user states that the image is from the promotional music video, but it's not. Yes, the photo is from a taped concert where footage was used for a promotional music video for the song performed in the picture, but the picture in question was taken by a Disney photography for press on their Disney Channel Media Net press site. The caption box for the original picture can be found here:[2]. Rockin56 (talk) 23:38, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Image_name.ext

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree image below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Erroneous Nomination. When following the listing instructions (step 2), you need to replace "Image_name.ext" with the actual name of the file. You'll also want to put your reason for deletion just after "reason=". Feel free to just replace this entire section with the corrected template. If you are still having trouble, ask for help at WT:PUF or at my talk page. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:13, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

reason Ipodnano05 (talk) 23:52, 21 July 2009 (UTC) The image is unfree. The copyright is for screenshots... it was replaced by mistake because I uploaded it on a slow computer, I thought it didn't upload the first time. That was all, a simple error.[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.