Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/World Chess Championship 1972/1

< Wikipedia:Good article reassessment

World Chess Championship 1972

edit
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
Result pending

The article contains lots of uncited statements, including some marked with "citation needed" since September 2023. Z1720 (talk) 22:05, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see only one "citation needed", something about the cold war context. Could probably refactor the statement to say that the match generated considerable international media interest or something to that effect, which is fairly self-evidently true, but could easily find cites from among our existing references. MaxBrowne2 (talk) 22:56, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • I added citation needed tags to the article to indicate other places where citations are needed. Some of these are necessary to support opinionated statements. about the matches. Z1720 (talk) 23:11, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    A lot of those are completely unnecessary. "Fischer won, putting him ahead 5-3". That's how scoring works in chess, this WP:BLUE stuff. The Alexander quote is obviously related to the book which is cited in the very same sentence. The fact that Spassky would have retained the title in the event of a tie is cited earlier in the article.... MaxBrowne2 (talk) 00:33, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If someone thinks a citation is unnecessary, they can remove it. WP:BLUE is an essay, "It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Wikipedia contributors...it has not been thoroughly vetted by the community." It does not supercede WP:V. Regardless, I think statements like, "Fischer dominated the 1971 Candidates Tournament; his 6–0–0 defeats of both Mark Taimanov and Bent Larsen were, and as of 2024 still are, unparalleled at this level of chess", "Fischer won 19 games (plus 1 win on forfeit) without losing once, almost all against top grandmasters", and "Excitement grew as the match was postponed and people questioned whether Fischer would appear" need citations. If something is cited earlier in the article, the citation can be repeated. If the citation is earlier in the sentence, the citation can be moved to the end of the sentence. Z1720 (talk) 00:46, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to me like excessive and possibly reactionary WP:TAGBOMBING for earlier opposition in this thread. For example, how do you justify putting a citation-needed tag on an already cited quote:

According to C.H.O'D. Alexander:<ref>Alexander 1972, p. 96</ref> "This game was notable for two things. First, Fischer played the Queen's Gambit for the first time in his life in a serious game; second, he played it to perfection, the game indeed casting doubt on Black's whole opening system."[citation needed]

If the citation is earlier in the sentence, the citation can be moved to the end of the sentence. Z1720 (talk) Instead of tagging, why not just move it?! --IHTS (talk) 03:22, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ihardlythinkso: This article has multiple missing citations. It would take me hours to look at each uncited text, understand what the text is telling the reader and possibly find a reliable source that will verify the information. Fixing one missing citation will not allow this article to meet the GA criteria. If other editors are interested in fixing up the article, I am happy to provide another review once the work is complete and indicate where citations are missing, as I did above. Z1720 (talk) 03:32, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • No one asked you to go digging to source any missing refs, just move a ref in lieu of tagging it lacking. And am not sure it's required that a ref be located at the tail of a quotation instead of at the head. (Does it in any policy or guideline?) And whether a text requires a cited ref is afterall a judgment call (reasonably open to challenge), you seem to suggest it is more of an absolute requiring "fixing". Am in agreement w/ Max that you've added several unnecessary flags. --IHTS (talk) 03:47, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Ihardlythinkso: Before moving a reference to the end of the sentence, I would have to check the reference to make sure it is verifying the information I am claiming it is verifying. If sources have been moved without this check being done, then the article will have to go through a source check before it can be declared "keep". Z1720 (talk) 15:27, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • WP:PAIC says "All reference tags should immediately follow the text to which the footnote applies", which also applies to quotes. Z1720 (talk) 15:27, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • According to WP:V, all text needs a reference to verify the information. An exception includes the lead (because the information is cited later in the article). Z1720 (talk) 15:27, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/World_Chess_Championship_1972/1&oldid=1266539187"