Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2021 October 14

< October 13	October 15 >

October 14

File:Favorite (2021 NCT 127 album).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Was prodded by Ss112. Clindberg, do you think this meets c:COM:TOO South Korea? In terms of complexity this is closer to the seagull pattern that is ineligible than the Fox Racing logo that is eligible. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 16:40, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, hence my PROD. I don't see the point in resizing this or keeping it on Wikipedia if it's not being used, no matter how simple it may be. If we included it on the article along with the two main digital covers (for the original Sticker album and its repackage Favorite), it would start to look like a misuse of covers and a cover gallery, going against WP:NFCC. There are other variant covers of this album that haven't been uploaded so I don't know why we're keeping this around. It seems like Rupturestriker found this cover on NCT 127's webstore and assumed it was the main cover of the repackage but it isn't, so it's redundant. There have been two renames of this file, a discussion on one of those file-name redirects, a PROD, a resize and now a discussion. Enough fuss. Let us be done with this artwork. Ss112 16:50, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Ss112: I pinged Clindberg because this cover may be eligible for moving to Commons. Wikidata and various Wikipedias don't have a fair use exemption and could decide to include this cover. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 17:11, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Btw, the font for "FAVORITE" is TAN NIMBUS otf (400). — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 17:54, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It would pretty much only be a question of the grid for the U.S., and so I don't think it's copyrightable there. Much less idea about South Korea, although their two examples would have been ruled the same way in the U.S. as well, almost certainly, so maybe their dividing lines are similar. But likely OK to move. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:14, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I changed the licensing section. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 12:41, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Meccanotecnica Riesi Sign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The copy on Flickr is attributed to Meccanotecnica Riesi, but the Wikipedia uploader is User:Trotta.j and I can't find any immediate evidence of the uploader's own work claim. Stefan2 (talk) 18:20, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. @Stefan2: The uploader likely has a connection to Meccanotecnica Riesi looking at their contributions. The file was uploaded here on 22 July 2014, only 4 days after the Flickr upload making own work very plausible. More importantly: our file has metadata and much more detail than the Flickr file, proving Flickr is not the original source. The uploader was just being honest when our wizard asked if they had published the photo anywhere else previously. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 19:02, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Louisiana Senate.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete local copy as scaled-down duplicate of Commons file. Ixfd64 (talk) 19:59, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low-resolution copy of File:Louisiana State Senate.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 19:18, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 06:56, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.